Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

well its got,

part of vehicle in need of attention: structural alterations.

attention required: engine bay- to fit intercooler. Recomend certification by V.A.S.S engineer.

it also says, to be cleared by jamie at burwood east vic roads

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/141205-defected/page/2/#findComment-2634314
Share on other sites

Yeah dude sounds like you got stung by 'Pedda' or what ever that cops name is... there's no fooling him. He's always out near Knox.

yeah that guy, everyones knows of him. When i saw the name tag i was like 'oh f##k im a goner'

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/141205-defected/page/2/#findComment-2634317
Share on other sites

well its got,

part of vehicle in need of attention: structural alterations.

attention required: engine bay- to fit intercooler. Recomend certification by V.A.S.S engineer.

it also says, to be cleared by jamie at burwood east vic roads

You can get it cleared anywhere.

Sounds like this 'jamie' guy is pettits buddy, so would go to him to get it cleared.

If the defect says 'recommend certification by V.A.S.S engineer' you could have got away with it. The officer in question will write any bs on there and waste your time and money, doesent mean you actually need to do it all

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/141205-defected/page/2/#findComment-2634471
Share on other sites

Before you spend any money find out the FACTS from Vicroads about what you will need to do have the defect cleared.

Also find out why your are meant to be assessed by only one vicroads staff member in Victoria.

It would not suprise me if you have been harrassed for owning an imported car by a police officer that has no idea of the rules and regulations.

Unfortunately the police do not need to prove a modification or vehicle is in a roadworthy condition, they only need to suspect it to issue a defect notice.

That is why you find out from vicroads first.

If you find that you have been harrassed and this officer has acted unlawfully or has made it unduelly hard on you to clear your defect you may be entitled to seek compensation from Victoria Police for all costs incurred due to this officers lack of knowledge.

I would also recommend keeping all paperwork and writing a letter to the office of police integrity to complain of the harrassment and improper directions given to you to clear your defect notice.

A black mark on a Police officers file last's a lot longer than a defect notice on the window, and i can tell you from experience if you do make a complaint and then you are further harrassed you will be able to escalate your complaint and land that particular officer in more trouble.

Tips,

Keep all paperwork and receipts,

try where possible to get written advice from vicroads/ vic police on how to clear your defect

have your defect cleared by someone not listed on your notice

write all facts down in a logical sensible manner, dont exagerate or lie.

Office of Police Integrity

GPO Box 4676

Melbourne 3001

DX 210004

Level 3 459 Collins St

Melbourne

Phone: 8635 6188

Toll Free: 1800 818 387

Fax: 8635 6185

Email: [email protected]

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/141205-defected/page/2/#findComment-2634842
Share on other sites

As long as you havent cut a hole through the chassis rails for the cooler return pipe it does not effect anything in the front end of the car.

I got done ages ago for this same BS but didnt need to get a engineers certificate or any other bs, just a rwc, where nothing was changed anyway.

Car does not have to go back to stock if the cooler is the only mod

So what's the deal with the FMIC and drilling a hole through the side of the battery tray? I know of a lot of skylines with the 'hybrid' style intercooler kits where cutting is required, and been told that this shoudn't be an issue in most cases with the authorities, yet i've heard of a lot of stories contradicting those claims?:P

I'm looking into an FMIC from just-jap, and want to make clear if this is actually a big risk to take and if there's any documentation regarding this modification from vic-roads?

I just want to make this absolutely clear, as i'm not interested in the other types going around with the return pipe running under the core.

Cheers,

Steve.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/141205-defected/page/2/#findComment-2649846
Share on other sites

technically it depends on where u cut under the battery tray, there is a section where its only a thin plate and u can see a few cm under that , there is a thicker plate which is part of the chasis.

my old man is an engineer (not cert to clear defects as his not in that industry ) and he explained to me, how most cops will tell you its illegal without actually knowing what part of the car is classified structure.

the part where ur suppose to cut doesnt actually interfer with any laws, as its not part of the chasis rail. (this is the part of the law were u get a defect for changing the structual of the vehicle.)

take a look at the pic and then take of ur front rim so u can see what i mean, and u will realise its actually legal to cut out that part of the tray. Anything under that red line CANNOT be cut, anything above is allowed, with that in mind make sure the hole also looks clean cut and doesnt like like a dog took a bite out of it.

tray.jpg

Edited by mr_crust
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/141205-defected/page/2/#findComment-2650233
Share on other sites

I remember when i installed my first intercooler kit onto my r32 gtst, the car had an outline of a perfect circle in the side of the battery tray, almost as if to say "when installing an aftermarket fmic, cut here"

Perhaps where the piping would go through if the car had been a gtr?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/141205-defected/page/2/#findComment-2650773
Share on other sites

i can prove that its LEGAL to cut under that battery tray.

The act states if anything is done to alter the chassis it breaks the law, as your vehicle has been structually altered. Under the battery tray on an r33 there is whats known as a 'skirt' that is the 1mm thick peice of s/s, now if you refer to my above photo you will notice that this is connect to the chassis ( more then double the thickness of the skirt)

Obviously if you cut into the chassis you will no doubt weaken the structure of your vehicle, thats the reason its an instant defect.

There is no law in place in Victoria stating its illegal to cut into the skirt, its only a lack of knowledge that innocent people get pulled over and take an officers advice that what they have done is illegal, as police are respected members of the community and should be doing things correctly, not to line their pockets.

I will try and look for the act and i will post it up

EDIT : this is the act, the whole thing is relevant , but i highlighted the exact part i believe, as a skirt is not classified as a major body part and its not part of the chassis

Acts.png

and if i'm not wrong doesnt the GTR's pipe work go through here?

Edited by mr_crust
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/141205-defected/page/2/#findComment-2654265
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...