Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys just wondering ive got an R33 gts-t 1995, can the car be rev limited...if that makes sense, my car says it can rev to 9000, but the redline starts at 7, and the revs will not exceed 7000, like the needle for the revs will just bounce up and down at 7, dono if this is a skyline R33 thing, or my car is just the odd one out. And can u get like a piggy back computer to change that...

cheers! :rofl:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/141364-can-r33s-be-rev-limited/
Share on other sites

dont let it sit at 7k, ull break somthing.

that sounds normal, same with my car. the limiter on them stops them from going over 190kmh, in 5th at full throddle, u can get past about 5.5k.

Dunno about that vange......... I've had mine with the needle pointing straight down(well past the 180) and that was early 5th! and as for the limiter........ it's there for a reason to stop you from going into the unknown, it's ok to go there, just not too often! LOL

They all have rev limiters in, just about every car with an ECU has one, it's common sense.

These aren't carbied V8's that let you spin em till they do bearings, or just 'splode, etc.

Just coz the guage says 9000 RPM doesn't mean you can actually hit it.

You can get Nismo 320KPH Speedos too...

I can't remember the factory ECU strategy but I'm pretty sure it's an ignition cut.

They make a distinctive noise when they bounce off it too.

I tell a lie, you probably could hit 9000 RPM if you were revving high in 3rd gear, and on the gear change managed to grab 2nd instead 4th.

Pretty sure a Volvo did it in Targa a few years back, went to 10,000 RPM, then popped!

Edit: The easiest way to find it (your limit) is do a burnout in 2nd.

You should be able to hold it there no worries for a while.

Just don't go free revving it to find out (can't remember exactly why but) it's bad.

If i remember rightly stock R32 is about 7200RPM (gauge reads 8500-9000 and redline starts at 6500-7000).

Edited by Oosh
Dunno about that vange......... I've had mine with the needle pointing straight down(well past the 180) and that was early 5th! and as for the limiter........ it's there for a reason to stop you from going into the unknown, it's ok to go there, just not too often! LOL

yeh i guessed 190, cos it passes the 180, didnt really get my protractor out n see if its pointing down, cos i was going a bit fast at the time lol :)

yeh i had 5th n it wouldnt go anymore, n i had a bit more revs left in it....

No it is 180KPH, once your speedo gets abouve 100KPH it's pretty inaccurate, that's why it'll show 190KPH on the dial around the speed cut.

Hook up to the consult port and get a digital read-out and you can see the difference.

Edit: Maybe i'm selling the poor speedo short, that's only about a 5% error really, it just gets compounded the faster you go.

Edited by Oosh

The rb25's are prone to throwing rods at around 7500rpm, It will handle 7000rpm with confidence. It's best in every respect not to 'free rev' the motor past around 5 grand, the reason for this is a free reving motor doesn't have nearly enough load on all the components to stop them flapping around 'so to speak' where as a motor under full load at 7000rpm will have a lot more load bearing down on the rods etc, keeping bearing clearances to a bear minimum holding it all together. i hope that makes sence. I'm not saying that you can rev your motor as much as you like with load, im just saying all the components eg. gugion pins, bottom end bearings and the enertia of the pistons aren't bouncing around in fresh air causing unwanted vibration.

i would imagine free revving an engine would tend to stretch rods etc.

correct me if im wrong. i'm taking this information from things ive been told and read.

Edited by R3125DET
No it is 180KPH, once your speedo gets abouve 100KPH it's pretty inaccurate, that's why it'll show 190KPH on the dial around the speed cut.

Hook up to the consult port and get a digital read-out and you can see the difference.

Edit: Maybe i'm selling the poor speedo short, that's only about a 5% error really, it just gets compounded the faster you go.

Well I know my speedo's pretty accurate to within a couple kays at 100. So I calculated out my speed according to what RPM my tacho was reading (5250 I think it was, it was a fair while ago) & how many kph/1000 rpm the car did in 5th & it worked out to bang on 200kph. However there is a soft cut at 180kph where acceleration dies off very suddenly, so it then creeps to the 200 hard cut.

Without the speed limiter the car is theoretically capable of reaching 250kph when hitting the rev limiter in 5th, actually capable if the car has been modified sufficiently.

Also the rev limiter is definantely fuel cut. If it was ignition it would pop & crackle & carry on just like a drifter does when they find the limiter.

Edited by JazzaR33
The rb25's are prone to throwing rods at around 7500rpm, It will handle 7000rpm with confidence. It's best in every respect not to 'free rev' the motor past around 5 grand, the reason for this is a free reving motor doesn't have nearly enough load on all the components to stop them flapping around 'so to speak' where as a motor under full load at 7000rpm will have a lot more load bearing down on the rods etc, keeping bearing clearances to a bear minimum holding it all together. i hope that makes sence. I'm not saying that you can rev your motor as much as you like with load, im just saying all the components eg. gugion pins, bottom end bearings and the enertia of the pistons aren't bouncing around in fresh air causing unwanted vibration.

i would imagine free revving an engine would tend to stretch rods etc.

correct me if im wrong. i'm taking this information from things ive been told and read.

Don't mean to shoot you down, but tell me this. How often have you seen/heard of a an engine throwing a rod when it's just free reving? Probably never I'd say. 99 times out of a 100 things fail on an engine when under heavy load. Only thing I reckon you're likely to do free reving is hit a valve against a piston if you go beyond it's revving capabilities.

I've lost count of the amount of times I've hit the limiter (I can't help myself :)) but if the limiter wasn't there, I'd be far more cautious about reving my engine hard.

Edit: Yes I agree fuel cut isn't as good, I try to get off it ASAP

Edited by JazzaR33

i would imagine because those motors are reving far beyond their capability and half the time too much power aswell. you dont hear of many free revving rod throwers because most people aren't game enough to try. hehe

I have this discovery channel dvd at home about how cars are made, most euro and jap cars are tested way beyond their limits, They said most car manufacturers sit the engines on an engine dyno and bounce them off the limiter for a couple of hours!!! hehe amazing

^^id say so, but it depends what ur doing, when ur sideways its pretty hard to change gears and steer at the same time (unless ur mardle) so u dont have much choice but to bounce it off the limit. but for a drag, i wouldnt rev it past 7k, no point really.

is it fair to say staying within the red line gives you maximum performance and torque?

i highly doubt that it gives you any additional performance or torque once it pasts say 6k rpm. reason being is that (if were talking stock engine/turbo here) at that stage things just run out of puff. if you look at a majority of dyno figures, the graphs shows the power curve dying off at its peak (rev limiter). thats what i think anyways, so personally i dont see point in revving it anywhere near redline.

^^ Yes this is abosolutely true you will not gain anything by reving over 6 grand on the stock engine.

I always remember it feeling like it was struggling once it got past 6 with the stock exhaust, it was pointless. However with the new exhaust my own flattens in the power department at about 6500 & only just starts to die off before the limiter & is slowly dropping torque throughout the rev range.

Driving the car now I sometimes hit the limiter thinking it's got at least another 500 rpm more left in it.... until the mandarory brap brap brap happens & I see the tacho pointing at the red.... Whoops

No doubt with a freer flowing & much better cooling front mount the torque would be almost dead flat till at least 5 grand I reckon with much less drop off thereafter.

i highly doubt that it gives you any additional performance or torque once it pasts say 6k rpm. reason being is that (if were talking stock engine/turbo here) at that stage things just run out of puff. if you look at a majority of dyno figures, the graphs shows the power curve dying off at its peak (rev limiter). thats what i think anyways, so personally i dont see point in revving it anywhere near redline.

haha what i meant was staying before the redline, my bad! and what i was trying to get at was what is the point of going over when the car normally pull out the best torque before it! the only time i'll go past redline is when i forget to look at my revs

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
    • Hi,  Just joined the forum so I could share my "fix" of this problem. Might be of use to someone. Had the same hunting at idle issue on my V36 with VQ35HR engine after swapping the engine because the original one got overheated.  While changing the engine I made the mistake of cleaning the throttle bodies and tried all the tricks i could find to do a throttle relearn with no luck. Gave in and took it to a shop and they couldn't sort it. Then took it to my local Nissan dealership and they couldn't get it to idle properly. They said I'd need to replace the throttle bodies and the ecu probably costing more than the car is worth. So I had the idea of replacing the carbon I cleaned out with a thin layer of super glue and it's back to normal idle now. Bit rough but saved the car from the wreckers 🤣
    • After my last update, I went ahead with cleaning and restoring the entire fuel system. This included removing the tank and cleaning it with the Beyond Balistics solution, power washing it multiple times, drying it thoroughly, rinsing with IPA, drying again with heat gun and compressed air. Also, cleaning out the lines, fuel rail, and replacing the fuel pump with an OEM-style one. During the cleaning process, I replaced several hoses - including the breather hose on the fuel tank, which turned out to be the cause of the earlier fuel leak. This is what the old fuel filter looked like: Fuel tank before cleaning: Dirty Fuel Tank.mp4   Fuel tank after cleaning (some staining remains): Clean Fuel Tank.mp4 Both the OEM 270cc and new DeatschWerks 550cc injectors were cleaned professionally by a shop. Before reassembling everything, I tested the fuel flow by running the pump output into a container at the fuel filter location - flow looked good. I then fitted the new fuel filter and reassembled the rest of the system. Fuel Flow Test.mp4 Test 1 - 550cc injectors Ran the new fuel pump with its supplied diagonal strainer (different from OEM’s flat strainer) and my 550cc injectors using the same resized-injector map I had successfully used before. At first, it idled roughly and stalled when I applied throttle. Checked the spark plugs and found that they were fouled with carbon (likely from the earlier overly rich running when the injectors were clogged). After cleaning the plugs, the car started fine. However, it would only idle for 30–60 seconds before stalling, and while driving it would feel like a “fuel cut” after a few seconds - though it wouldn’t fully stall. Test 2 – Strainer swap Suspecting the diagonal strainer might not be reaching the tank bottom, I swapped it for the original flat strainer and filled the tank with ~45L of fuel. The issue persisted exactly the same. Test 3 – OEM injectors To eliminate tuning variables, I reinstalled the OEM 270cc injectors and reverted to the original map. Cleaned the spark plugs again just in-case. The stalling and “fuel cut” still remained.   At this stage, I suspect an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, caused during the cleaning process. This has led me to look into getting Frenchy’s fuel hanger and replacing the unit entirely. TL;DR: Cleaned and restored the fuel system (tank, lines, rail, pump). Tested 550cc injectors with the same resized-injector map as before, but the car stalls at idle and experiences what feels like “fuel cut” after a few seconds of driving. Swapped back to OEM injectors with original map to rule out tuning, but the issue persists. Now suspecting an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, possibly cause by the cleaning process.  
×
×
  • Create New...