Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i think speeding in a school zone should be loss of licence straight away if during school hours .when you have kids yourself you will understand .look at that poor kid sophie 2nd time hit speed driver thru school zone . gee if ya cant even slow down for kids ya dont deserve to have a car . if you got done out of school hrs i hope ya dont get much of a fine if it was during school hours i hope ya walk for 6 months

cheers have a nice day

Sophie didn`t get hit by a speeding driver any how 1st time it was some old dude that had a heart attack the 2nd time the driver wasn`t speeding

Roads are built for Motorvehicles. If your on the road and your not in a car you had better be even more aware of surroundings.

The shift in responsibility is wrong. Kids might be kids but they also end up dead kids.

Parents have a duty of care for their own children and teaching them road safety. Children under 8 have not developed adequate sound, depth perception and have a narrow visual focus.

No-one can argue with 1000+kgs of moving metal on the road. Even when your in the right.

Sophie didn`t get hit by a speeding driver any how 1st time it was some old dude that had a heart attack the 2nd time the driver wasn`t speeding
yeah didnt the nanny step out on a crossing with her, and the driver was blinded by the sun or something and didnt see them? the second time I mean.

anyway... I have my fine

$133 and 1 point for <15km over

I can live with that :mad:

hehe same fine for me.. speeding up into an 80 zone too early and done for speeding. $133 and 1 point for 11kms over.

Personally i think A.C.T should have the same rules as most other states when it comes to school zones, having a gap between 10 and 2 where the 40 zone doesnt apply.

yeah didnt the nanny step out on a crossing with her, and the driver was blinded by the sun or something and didnt see them? the second time I mean.

anyway... I have my fine

$133 and 1 point for <15km over

I can live with that :laugh:

Yeah i thought that would be the case, lucky you got a nice cop, not a super yes sir cop.

Personally i think A.C.T should have the same rules as most other states when it comes to school zones, having a gap between 10 and 2 where the 40 zone doesnt apply.

Oh noez! How will they raise revenue!!?

Hehe, joking around.

I cant agree more with the above post about the shift of responsibility. EVERYTHING now is about covering your arse and not being held responsible for anything.

Look right, left and right again. Click clack front and back etc are all missing from schools today. Its sad, sad that somone obeying the speed limit and the law in a school zone is blamed for when some little mongrel of a kid runs out onto the road without looking cause mums having a smoke... is it their fault? HELL NO!!! but they still cop the blame and its BS!

/rant

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I agree with everything else, except (and I'm rethinking this as it wasn't setup how my brain first though) if the sensor is at the end of a hose which is how it has been recommended to isolate it from vibrations, then if that line had a small hole in, I could foresee potentially (not a fluid dynamic specialist) the ability for it to see a lower pressure at the sensor. But thinking through, said sensor was in the actual block, HOWEVER it was also the sensor itself that broke, so oil pressure may not have been fully reaching the sensor still. So I'm still in my same theory.   However, I 100% would be saying COOL THE OIL DOWN if it's at 125c. That would be an epic concern of mine.   Im now thinking as you did Brad that the knock detection is likely due to the bearings giving a bit more noise as pressure dropped away. Kinkstah, drop your oil, and get a sample of it (as you're draining it) and send it off for analysis.
    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
    • I don't know it is due to that. It could just be due to load on track being more than a dyno. But it would be nice to rule it out. We're talking a fraction of a second of pulling ~1 degree of timing. So it's not a lot, but I'd rather it be 0... Thicker oil isn't really a "bandaid" if it's oil that is going to run at 125C, is it? It will be thicker at 100 and thus at 125, where the 40 weight may not be as thick as one may like for that use. I already have a big pump that has been ported. They (They in this instance being the guy that built my heads) port them so they flow more at lower RPM but have a bypass spring that I believe is ~70psi. I have seen 70psi of oil pressure up top in the past, before I knew I had this leak. I have a 25 row oil cooler that takes up all the space in the driver side guard. It is interesting that GM themselves recommend 0-30 oil for their Vette applications. Unless you take it to the track where the official word is to put 20-50w oil in there, then take that back out after your track day is done and return to 0-30.
×
×
  • Create New...