Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

You cut the sensor out of the std rb25 AFM and you put the sensor in to a 3in pipe because the std one is 2.5in so this means that less air will go past the sensor,has anyone done this before.

Similar to what Autospeed did except they used a seperate bypass pipe then the digital fuel adjuster to get the A/F mixtures correct.

In theory it should work the same way, just don't damage the AFM hotwires!

You cut the sensor out of the std rb25 AFM and you put the sensor in to a 3in pipe because the std one is 2.5in so this means that less air will go past the sensor

umm... no it doesnt

have you looked at an AFM before?

You'll see that changing the diameter wont affect it at all as the AFM wire is in the middle of the AFM itself.

The amount of air going isnt going to change

I think it would, wouldn’t the wire measure the air and then calculate that by 2.5'' pipe

so if the pipe was 3'' the air would measure the same but there would be more air in the 3'' pipe then the 2.5'' pipe.??

I'm just guessing..

area of a 2.5" pipe = 31.6cm2

area of a 3" pipe = 45.5cm2

the bigger pipe will flow more air, but since the sensor only reads what goes though the little hole it sits in, then calculates how much air that is for the designated size of the pipe, when you put it into a bigger pipe it throws the calculations out and you end up with leaner mixtures.

as has been said, the AFM wire will indeed sense less amount of air, but all this will do will make the car run leaner as it will add less fuel. without tuning it would be useless. and given you'd have to tune, it makes sense to go z32 if you are going the whole hogg

btw.. nissan AFMs use a hot wire with variable resistances, right?

but since you generally have to run some form of either piggyback or full ecu to run a z32, i don't think that leaning out would be an issue since you have to get it tuned for the afm either way.

personally i'd just get an ecu that uses a map sensor.

just know about this a while ago....

found a webpage that did this...and in the same time...upgraded his injectors...

so i think there wouldnt be any problem if u cut off the AFM and fit it in a bigger pipe and in the same time fit in a bigger injectors....and tune it back to optimal settings....

i just dont see a problem with this MOD...

plus...u can save some cash....for budget drifters....

Edited by r32gt_rb20

Bah, pack of gurls! =)

There’s a risk, but in reality if you seal the sensor to the pipe well ( careful not to use any noxious adhesives that will eat the PCB) and tune it properly, ( piggy back, FC) it would be well impressive to get it working.

Perfect for the budget conscious.

That said, for $300 there’s no way i would risk my motor :D

M

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Block bump. $400. As above cyl 6 needs bore or sleeve.
    • I would think making the argument that the travel is limited by a spring flexing against a spring perch as "the same method". Later on in the document they do state that the spring can't bind on full bump travel and cannot come loose in full rebound travel as well. (which is all very sensible). The laws are actually pretty sensible and reasonable. It's just that the people who enforce and check them don't actually read them or know them accurately. "Oh, coilovers? Instant fail mate. Don't even need to look at it." - Guy who will be instantly reported by me. There is probably merit to people who do get defected for height also get defected for the suspension in that state that allows it. I did never consider the people who are complaining about coilovers being picked on are also running around at 50mm off the floor.
    • I think given SAU's knowledge of E85 we can strongly conclude that 10% ethanol in almost any situation is entirely fine. Almost all of the myths against E85 were overblown, let alone E10.
    • From your link See bold text, is this referring to damper settings, if so that may a issue for "some" inspectors, I cannot see aftermarket coilovers having the evidence that "must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original" Maybe just remove the adjustment knows and hope for the best???? Meh 5.2 Suspension travel In all instances, modifications to a vehicle’s suspension must ensure the integrity of the system and not compromise the ride quality. At least two thirds of the original suspension travel should be maintained in both directions (rebound (i.e. extension) and bump (i.e. compression)), and rebound must be limited by the same method used by the vehicle manufacturer or if this is not practicable due to the nature of the modification, an equivalent method. If an alternative method is used, evidence must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original.
    • They actually don't - They adhere to VSB14 rules just like Victoria. The rules are against CABIN adjustable height, and it quite clearly states that the height has to be within parameters. I asked the VASS engineer to confirm this when I got my car engineered and they refused to engineer the coilovers because they didn't meet the requirements for requiring engineering. (mine are height adjustable.) People "Not wanting to bother" with "Actually reading/knowing/adhering to the rules" should result in fines and immediately losing the ability to issue blue slips and/or RWC's in Vic.
×
×
  • Create New...