Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 103
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

my car, completely stock as it left the factory dyno'd in at 97kw @ wheels on sst's dyno, with just one of jash's cat back CRAP exhausts I went to 115kw's. With a trust fmic, blitz dual sbc set to 12 psi I've gone to 175kw, used the same dyno everytime. given that the runs were done on different days, different air temps etc etc etc... it gives me a rough idea of my gains for money spent. My dump+front pipe are letting me down though, as my car drops boost immediately around 5500rpm, doesnt tail off just drops straight down to 9psi. dump+front pipe are next on the mod list.

Rob,

Very low figures for a healthy stocky (97rwkw) on the "average" Dyno Dynamics dyno. I'm guessing you'd be the guy that wrote in to HPI asking Martin, why so low?

175rwkw with your current mod's sounds about right. From 97rwkw to 175rwkw (78rwkw for the lazy) from an exhaust, FMIC & a bit of extra boost. Something wasn't right with the car to start with. Very restritive &/or blocked cat? I witnessed a heavily tweaked GTS25t go from 219rwkw to 282rwkw after nothing more than the removal of its nasty compliance fitted cat & cat back section.

Originally posted by rob77

my car, completely stock as it left the factory dyno'd in at 97kw @ wheels on sst's dyno, with just one of jash's cat back CRAP exhausts I went to 115kw's. With a trust fmic, blitz dual sbc set to 12 psi I've gone to 175kw, used the same dyno everytime. given that the runs were done on different days, different air temps etc etc etc... it gives me a rough idea of my gains for money spent. My dump+front pipe are letting me down though, as my car drops boost immediately around 5500rpm, doesnt tail off just drops straight down to 9psi. dump+front pipe are next on the mod list.

Yeah, I would say the stock exhaust was very restrictive and was really keeping the boost low (we didnt measure the boost on the dyno run or the A/F ratio when we did the 97kw run) now at 175kw the car runs rich to start with but by the end of the run its getting a tad lean and yes that was me who wrote into HPI. I still have the very small cat on the car from compliance, I may end up putting a hiflo 3" unit in one day, but I'll be doing my front+dump pipe first.

Originally posted by R31 Chick

Whatsis oh whatever, you have been on our WA area all day, is it boring in the SA one?

Of coarse you are welcome, don't take me the wrong way, I am not Paul or Maccka!

Whatsisname too hard to spell? ;) I bet you say whatsisname more than you realise. Everybody that you can't remember the name of is called 'whatsisname':D Whatsisname is also the name of a character in the Magic Faraway Tree, for those old enough to remember the book/s.

WA, NSW, SA, VIC, TAS... I peruse them all. I've lived in most states of OZ I don't consider any of them as my home state, they're all home!

I'll often leave the PC still logged onto a particular forum section too. So I'm 'on', but not there. Opposite to my brain most days, it's there but not 'on'.

If there's nothing happening in the SA forum then it does indeed get boring.

Cheers,

Matt

Originally posted by rob77

Yeah, I would say the stock exhaust was very restrictive and was really keeping the boost low (we didnt measure the boost on the dyno run or the A/F ratio when we did the 97kw run) now at 175kw the car runs rich to start with but by the end of the run its getting a tad lean and yes that was me who wrote into HPI. I still have the very small cat on the car from compliance, I may end up putting a hiflo 3" unit in one day, but I'll be doing my front+dump pipe first.

Rob/Steve,

Yeah thought the cat would've been a big factor.

Dave,

Sorry to postwhore so badly ;) Getting back on topic.....

My guess is 196.83rwkw

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Get an inspection camera up there. 
    • Yeah, but look at the margin in viscosity between the 40 and the 60 at 125°C. It is not very large. It is the difference between 7 and 11 cP. Compare that to the viscosity at only 90°C. The viscosity axis is logarithmic. The numbers at 90 are ~15 and ~35. That is about half for the 40 wt oil and <half for the 60. You give up viscosity EXPONENTIALLY as temperature rises. Literally. That is why I declare thicker oil to be a bandaid, and a brittle one at that. Keep the oil temperature under about 110°C and you should be better off.   Having said all of that, which remains true as a general principle, if you have indeed lost enough oil from the sump that the pump was seeing slightly aerated oil, then all bets are off. That would of course cause oil pressure to collapse. And 35 psi is a collapse given what you were doing to the engine. Especially if the oil was that hot and viscosity had also collapsed. And I would put money on rod or main bearings being the source of the any noise that registered as knock. Hydraulic lifters should be able to cope with the hotter oil and lower pressure enough to prvent too much high frequency noise, although I am willing to admit it could be the source.
    • Thanks for the reply mate. Well I really hope its a hose then not engine out job
    • But.... the reason I want to run a 60 weight is so at 125C it has the same viscosity as a 40 weight at 100C. That's the whole reason. If the viscosity changes that much to drop oil pressure from 73psi to 36psi then that's another reason I should be running an oil that mimics the 40 weight at 100C. I have datalogs from the dyno with the oil pressure hitting 73psi at full throttle/high RPM. At the dyno the oil temp was around 100-105C. The pump has a 70psi internal relief spring. It will never go/can't go above 70psi. The GM recommendation of 6psi per 1000rpm is well under that... The oil sensor for logging in LS's is at the valley plate at the back of  the block/rear of where the heads are near the firewall. It's also where the knock sensors are which are notable for 'false knock'. I'm hoping I just didn't have enough oil up top causing some chatter instead of rods being sad (big hopium/copium I know) LS's definitely heat up the oil more than RB's do, the stock vettes for example will hit 300F(150C) in a lap or two and happily track for years and years. This is the same oil cooler that I had when I was in RB land, being the Setrab 25 row oil cooler HEL thing. I did think about putting a fan in there to pull air out more, though I don't know if that will actually help in huge load situations with lots of speed. I think when I had the auto cooler. The leak is where the block runs to the oil cooler lines, the OEM/Dash oil pressure sender is connected at that junction and is what broke. I'm actually quite curious to see how much oil in total capacity is actually left in the engine. As it currently stands I'm waiting on that bush to adapt the sender to it. The sump is still full (?) of oil and the lines and accusump have been drained, but the filter and block are off. I suspect there's maybe less than 1/2 the total capacity there should be in there. I have noticed in the past that topping up oil has improved oil pressure, as reported by the dash sensor. This is all extremely sketchy hence wanting to get it sorted out lol.
×
×
  • Create New...