Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Any chance you can get "inspired" to put 19inch LMGT4 in Silver, always wanted to know how it will look on a BB GTR.

From memory, I believe I already have some pics of silver 19" LMGT4 on bayside blue GTR.

Will have a hunt around tonight and post them up for you.

Edited by iwanta34gtr

Hi all, its just an edited photo. I wanted to see how it looked if I did go down the path.

Playing with ideas at the moment.

DO IT! haha...

thats basically what mine will look like when im done, except for TE37sl's instead of LMGT4s... oh and yellow of course....

you dont want to edit it to yellow so i can get a feel for it ha? i might try later tonight when i get home

Agree BB would look great with 19" LMGTs but I have seen a few BB 34s that are a bit flat, or have mis-matching panels - look again closely at the Mines' one above; differences between tail lights and boot / bumper... the paint really needs to have been looked after (not faded; regularly polished and a good wax used) to give its best IMO. Then, it really stands out.

I know what you mean. A few of the BB ones I saw while shopping had actually lost their depth of colour a bit. They were not as vibrant as they should be.

I've previously taken notice of the common BB colour mismatch on the rear (as described above). I have always thought this was beacuse the paint sets differently on the bumper and taillights (plastic) to the bootlid (metal). Mainly visible in photos or from certain angles / light.

If you get a sec, please clarify - are you saying that the paint on the mines one above looks like it has not been given the love it deserves?

Cheers mate.

Edited by iwanta34gtr

If you get a sec, please clarify - are you saying that the paint on the mines one above looks like it has not been given the love it deserves?

Cheers mate.

Haha. If that middle pic I posted is anything to go by, and with my nitpicking cap on, that paint match is atrocious. Can't say that I wouldnt have that car though!

I seem to remember there being a thread floating around SAU or maybe another forum a while back when someone was inspecting a BB BNR34, suspected rear damage due to paint not matching at the rear; pics were posted, vendor got involved, accusations were made that pics were doctored, got to the point where someone actually used image-doctor detection software to tell if the image was shopped... All this bru-haha when it's quite possible that the paint just came that way from the Nissan factory??

Haha. If that middle pic I posted is anything to go by, and with my nitpicking cap on, that paint match is atrocious. Can't say that I wouldnt have that car though!

Thanks mate. Was curious because thats how mine is, I didnt know if it was because the paint had been mistreated at some point in its life for an extended period of time. My bootlid is slightly darker than the rest of my rear.

Now that is just pure sex

Glad you like them.

Terry_GT-R34's got me thinking now though. Would be fantastic to see a whole group of bayside blue GTR's together in some pro photos. I've never seen that before.

We should also ask Chris (Chris06-R) to join us, his R34 GTR is also BSB and very photogenic. That would make it an even 5.

Anyway, while looking for those pics for mclarenf1, I found this BSB GTR dumped on TE37's in my pic stash too, thought i'd share.

59967692499f8ce1f3abb.jpg

59967703195a31b50c4db.jpg

599676960762f8e33214b.jpg

Edited by iwanta34gtr

Correct. I did see the rear diffuser had been removed from the car.

Wouldnt want to crack that. Many $$$$ gone.

There is a guy called Stephen on here that actually owns a BSB 34 GTR with white TE37's on it - looks immaculate.

There is a guy called Stephen on here that actually owns a BSB 34 GTR with white TE37's on it - looks immaculate.

Had to dig up the pics for completions sake.

Amazing car, still in original condition apart from the rims.

It is crazy, how a set of rims can completely change the look of a car.

16116017.jpg

33131674.jpg

91443791.jpg

75746475.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...