Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

adding a bigger fuel pump shouldn't affect the AFR's unless the stock pump was dying. the fuel pressure reg makes it so no more fuel enters the system.

having the tune a bit richer up top is good. it cools the exhaust gas temperature, which is good for people running the stock turbo as it prevents the turbo dying so soon. sure you may not have the top end power of someone with a leaner tune up top, but you are running a safer tune, and the turbo will last a touch longer.

well i showed u all the dyno print out say what u will but im happy with what i got and i dont think his dyno would be out. even ray said that he has never had a car on his dyno make that much power with the mods i have so i dunno but i brought the car stock 2 1/2yrs ago from kamikaze motor and iv had the turbo out b4 and it looked pritty dam stock to me anyway i trust rays dyno maybe the people with low dyno reading should head down there and see what power they get. i love reading what arm chair experts have to say there so funny

CEF11E it wasnt 9psi at 6km/ph it was 60km/ph and he wasnt holding it on the dyno or what ever u where saying the reason it dips then goes up is because the knock senser detected a tiny knock so it retards it for a second so im ment to belive the knock was that small that ray couldnt even hear it with some funky special headphone he had on

One of these threads again.. :P

Its possible for an R33 with a bit of boost, exhaust and fmic to crack 200rwkw... All though its most definitely not common.

Out of many here in Adelaide I've only ever known of one that was able to do so. Good old Bugalugs here in SA. :)

If its any constellation it was a 1995 Model and had bits and pieces from the s1 and s2. It went on to run a [email protected] with a 2.183 60ft.

CEF11E it wasnt 9psi at 6km/ph it was 60km/ph and he wasnt holding it on the dyno or what ever u where saying the reason it dips then goes up is because the knock senser detected a tiny knock so it retards it for a second so im ment to belive the knock was that small that ray couldnt even hear it with some funky special headphone he had on

my bad... ment 60.. was typing in the dark

BTW. I am not having a go at you. I am just pointing out my observations :laugh: I am sure you wanted comments otherwise you would not have posted results here

Edited by CEF11E

well with those mods it is fairly high but im not too surprised as my very stock 33 with only a turbo back exhaust is making 170rwkw and thats at stock boost spiking to about 8.5-9psi. my estimation is that with with a fmic and boost to 12psi id be close to 200kw. not sure how much a gutted cat helps but it definitely reduces restrictions in airflow. so these figures dont surprise me...

The shape of the curve looks pretty normal to me for those mods.

Who cares about the peak power value. Wait......a dyno princess would, seems we still have plenty about on these forums these days :laugh: ... My car is so tough on the dyno....drive it?...oh no why would I care about that?

somthing aint normal - 210rwkw on 10psi? thats like 0.7 bar

at the end of the day though, dyno is just there for tuning. I wouldnt worry about a power fc at this stage though, probably not much point if you are making that sort of power, I havent seen much more power out of a stock turbo even with power fc

I got TBE, Remapped ECU and SMIC, running stock turbo on 8psi.

194rwkw @ DRC Dyno Day (unhappy dyno but I was running a lil lean, 12.5:1, cause of faulty stock pump. Most people thought readings were about 10% low)

196rwkw @ Bel Garage (Bosch 044 and a nice 11.8:1 AFR)

Hey mate just quickly, I'm assuming this is a road car yeah?

Not only that but also someone has mentioned what colour your car is? And i'm assuming that is your cars rego in the ID number on the dyno graph (and file name), AND it has your name on the Dyno graph, AND you're telling everyone reading this forum you have a gutted cat?

Hmmmm....

Dude I might be wrong, but for your own sake at least black out your rego details if those three letters and numbers are indeed your rego details.

Edited by insu
i run 14psi on the stock turbo. when i go back to 10 it feels so slow.

and yes i know the turbo won't last long.

Depending how you drive.

If your a squirt here squirt there type person it will probably last longer that your willing to put up with it before you throw on a bigger huffer.

If your a crazy mofo that likes to hold third gear down then click fourth as you weave in and out of traffic (as I see some here in Adelaide do) then it won't last long at all. :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...