Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Looking at lowering my spring rates both front/rear by 2kg/mm (manufacturer specifies acceptable range +/- 2kg/mm for my model)

Currently have "firm" rates:

Front 10kg/mm with free length of 175mm (Stroke 98mm)

Rear 8kg/mm with free length of 200mm (Stroke 111mm)

Now if I were to change to 8kg front and 6kg rear can I just use the longer rear spring in the front and lower the spring perch to compensate for height difference (final ride height won't matter as have 2 way height adjust). Just wondering if this will cause issues, wouldn't think so as springsare linear in rate.

Seeing if I can just buy x1 pair of springs?

thanks

Edited by PT

200mm free height spring is fine in the front. If you have preload and base height adjustment, that is more than enough to make the height right. And then a new pair of 200mm free height 6kg/mm in the rear.

So yes, you can just buy 1 pair of springs

  • 1 month later...

OK new springs have arrived and I have swapped them over and adjusted preload on them, not fitted to car as it's at the workshop getting other stuff done.

Main concern is the coilovers hitting the bump stops due to lighter spring rates. I have done rough calculations to try to offset this, I know it's not "exaclty" like this in real world as other factors occur but...

FRONT: factory weight=690kg, divide by two=345kg per side (L and R)

10kg/mm spring will compress ~34mm

8kg/mm spring will compress ~43mm

Difference ~9mm, so I have increased preload by 9mm over original set up (I have then taken into account I am using a longer spring too)

REAR: factory weight=550kg, therefore ~275kg per side

8kg/mm spring will compress ~34mm

6kg/mm spring will compress ~45mm

Difference ~11mm, so have increased preload by 11mm compared to before (BUT I hace a helper spring too 1.9kg/mm with 80mm free length=too hard to factor in)

Long winded post yes, plenty of crap figures/numbers yes, but have I gone about this in the right way???

Should or do I need to trim the bump stops, they are 2-3" long

Edited by PT

How much you trim the bump stops depends on the height you have the car set to. Whether or not it reaches the bumpstops depends on height, shock rates, where you're driving etc.

Increasing preload as you have done will raise the car, this may bother you.

How much the strut compresses also depends on the shock. A high pressure monotube shock will compress less than a low pressure twin tube shock because of the gas pressure inside acting as a spring.

Your rear struts have helper springs so that effectively gives bugger all preload when they are uncrushed. With the weight of the car down, the helper spring completely crushes so they dont have an effect on how the main spring behaves.

Edited by salad

yeah they have 2 way height adjustment so I can alter final ride height independently from the spring perch, hence preload affecting height can be negated.

they are a twin tube (Tein)

surprisingly despite the helper spring there the main spring has now got 5mm of preload on it by rasing the spring perch 11mm total

I'll wait til fitted before cutting the bumpstops in that case.

You haven't considered the dynamic weight transfer when cornering/braking/accelerating in your calculation :yes:

The strut will now compress further when cornering with the same load even if you increase the pre load to compensate for the difference in static loading.

If you are really concerned you can increase the pre load on the spring to the point where the weight of the car is only compressing it by a small amount (say 10-15mm either end) and adjust the height via the base adjustment in order to maximize travel.

Try this;

This is how much much to trim off a Group Buy front bump stop, shown next to a standard Skyline front bump stop. The orange line is for standard height, the red line is for ~350 mm centre of wheel to guard and the yellow line is for ~330 mm centre of wheel to guard.

Bump_Stop_Comparison_With_Heights_Small.jpg

:miner: cheers :laugh:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...