Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The wiggle up top is because of the 4wd.

Wow thats quiet an increase....

Your right about the cams but you have to get the correctly match turbo for the engine's intensions.

I've only ever seen thoes sorts of gains with n2o in place.

Edited by cameron

Ok so I take it you won't tell us the specifics... but how about something general -

1) These types of gains, or even something "similarly comparable", are they "available" across the board provided you have some sort of hardware under the bonnet?

2) What should people take into consideration when making their "cam selection"?

3) What made you guys change from the old ones?

bout time paul :)

i dont want to speculate on the specs, so cant u just put us out of our miserie please :) (or just the big 2, engine capacity and turbo selection, or r u still running what u had planeed originally?)

We have have seen a silimar phenomena when fitting a larger inlet cam.

By going from a 264 to a 272 duration on the inlet and spending more time on the dyno adjusting cam timing, we were able to achieve earlier boost response, significantly better top end AND at a lower boost pressure. Both cams are now 272 STEP 2 HKS items.

gallery_705_63_5597.jpg

Other specs as per the RB26 Turbo Upgrade Sticky

another related weird power issue that i witnessed was with mark jacobson's car at autosalon, on an early run he wasnt making the power he thought the car had, so he played with the cam timing abit and on the next run picked up 200hp :)

i dont want to pull the head off so can jam bigger sticks in there :banana:

yes you do, remember u were just itching to get it off :banana:

i guess we have to wait til tomorrow for paul to post in here. oh how the wait is going to kill me :)

P.S i'll have a guess and say there in the vacinity of 10.xx lift and 27x duration, am i right? :)

Man thats so much difference it looks like it was done in 2 different gears.

Definately no funny business like that going on...ill make that quite clear.

But yes the result shocked even the builder and tuner.

yes you do, remember u were just itching to get it off :P

i guess we have to wait til tomorrow for paul to post in here. oh how the wait is going to kill me :laugh:

P.S i'll have a guess and say there in the vacinity of 10.xx lift and 27x duration, am i right? :laugh:

Bigger than that :(

bout time paul :laugh:

i dont want to speculate on the specs, so cant u just put us out of our miserie please :laugh: (or just the big 2, engine capacity and turbo selection, or r u still running what u had planeed originally?)

who said it was my engine...or car ?

while some would have been happy with the original result (BTW this is pump fuel and no NOS) , the end result was achieved due to the effort by the boys at Croydon's. Truely world class...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Just don't use ChatGPT or any other artificial stupidity for the equivalent of googling. Their demonstrated inability to discriminate reality from hallucination should be enough to make them totally untrusted. LLMs don't know anything and cannot think to even the smallest extent. They are just predictors of the next word, and that should never be confused with capability.
    • I think, given the usage model described in the OP, I'd never ever experience the wonders of the 400kW upgrade. What I really need is boost from 2000rpm and probably no more than 260-270rwkW. But I suspect that the highflow is not actually the turbo for that purpose, so I may in fact need to get a G25 or 30 or something right sized and very spooly. We shall see after it is tuned. I've had to back the boost and boost ramp off to stop the thing from pinging since the highflow went on, so I've been almost living the NA life for 9 months now! Injectors are recently in hand. AFM is in hand. Dyno is fixed. Just need to clear a queue of f**king Supras out of the way (and probably fit my new gearbox). So....some time this year? Lol.
    • For what I gather is a Sunday/summer car....braided is fine. You're not going to be left without a vehicle and you have plenty of time for inspection/maintenance. Oof. I wouldn't use them that way. They can probably handle the temperature** but the internal corrugations means that their flow characteristics are a bit shit. Lots of extra friction and pressure loss. Makes them flow like the next pipe size down. ** They are stainless, and the stainless can usually be at least something like 304L, which is pretty good at higher temperatures (unlike 316L, which I would use for a wrt/corrosive environment, but not a particularly hot environment). But the welding needs to be top notch. And even then, because you usually need at least one cone-seat end on them (because you can twist the hose and do up both ends at the same time unless one of them is a union) they can be prone to coming loose with heat cycles.
    • I don't have the OEM oil feed lines though and the turbo-wraparound line is torn, only has water. My plan is to get replacements for these and just connect a braided line to there. And make sure it's leak free. Hoses like these are also sometimes used to connect external wastegates, so for an EGR I think you're good using them.
    • Alright I understand. The most likely case is probably gonna be that I just keep the OEM unit in the car as long as it works.
×
×
  • Create New...