Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i currently have a 400r front bar on my s2 33

but 8cm off the ground and steep driveways dont agree and my bar is pretty well phuct. ill be winding my hight up a lil and getting a new front bar but i dont know if im gunna get another 400r bar or try something new?

so in YOUR oppinion what is your favorite front?

and please post pics!

not the best pic but its the only one i got? this is before cooler and coilovers?

post-28326-1167200887.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/148879-your-favorite-front-bar/
Share on other sites

I reckon the orginal s2 front bar has to be best!!

Dont get a copy of it either..

Fibreglass will crack easily.. just like yours did!!

heres my car with the s2 front bar..

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...136226&st=0

i currently have a 400r front bar on my s2 33

but 8cm off the ground and steep driveways dont agree and my bar is pretty well phuct. ill be winding my hight up a lil and getting a new front bar but i dont know if im gunna get another 400r bar or try something new?

so in YOUR oppinion what is your favorite front?

and please post pics!

not the best pic but its the only one i got? this is before cooler and coilovers?

Hey, i've found 2 front bars that i personally love, here they are;

1298.jpg

&

1301.jpg

Both are sold by Jetspeed and look great imo. :sorcerer:

i got a series 1.5, running with a gtr front bar. looks good. but i also like the trust style front bar thats been posted with the grille as part of the bar. only problem with the trust style bar is that the top of that bar has to be trimmed so as to not hit the bonnet and the sides require additional screws into the bar to help raise the sides slightly to clost up the gap that will be left under the head light.

or so ive been told.

cheers

post-31466-1167376657.jpg

I'll second the s2 with front lip. To me, it's the nicest looking stock Skyline. I just love it. Simple, but with plenty of air ducting.

Although that other bar looks like a tidied version of the stocker... but it needs bigger ducting under the foggies.

1298.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...