Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Pot holes, gravel?? Its a tarmac rally what do you expect!!!!

I can understand the motivation, competitors don't want to risk their expensive cars and keeping it in one area geographically probably keeps cost down as well, something that Targa drastically needs.

I still think it is an appalling decision. Might as well cancel the whole event and extend Rallye Burnie or something.

  • Replies 380
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Pot holes and gravel is EXACTLY what we like... four wheel drive to the fore!

BUT, with the roads degrading every year, more and more of the older, less easily handle cars are finding it difficult to stay on the road, therefore we seem to get more downgrades or just cars off, which is no good to anyone. Wouldn't you agree? Witness, what, 4 cars off on one corner at Oyster Cove this year?

Personally, I reckon it's a good move in theory. I HATED the long liason drive up north on day 4, then lunch, then attacking Cethana when you're just starting to get tired. Bloody dangerous IMO. I can see the point with regard to the "duty of care" mentioned.

Safer Targa sets course to build bright future

Monday August 6, 2007

The 2008 Targa Tasmania course released today continues the three year rotation policy of ensuring all areas of Tasmania gain benefit from the multi-million dollar event and addresses the strong competitor demand that Australia’s ultimate tarmac rally continues to provide a fresh challenge annually.

Additionally, the new course also addresses vital competitor and general public safety issues by minimising travel time and focussing on user-friendly roads.

Event Director Mark Perry believes the changes will strengthen the event for the long term.

“Pivotal in all the changes included, and there are many, is that we continue to conduct the best event of its kind in Australia and produce an event that keeps competitors coming back year after year in the face of increasing competition from the mainland.”

“In some ways Targa has become a victim of its own success. People have seen what we have done here in Tasmania and over the last few years, many new events have started in Victoria, New South Wales and just recently in Queensland.”

“To survive and thrive we have to remain the best, and the status quo simply won’t achieve that goal.”

The 2008 course sees the West Coast finally rewarded for its years of loyal service to the event with its first ever overnight stop. Strahan will host the field at the end of a gruelling Day 4 (Saturday April 19).

Queenstown will also share the economic benefits and the event will provide a major showcase for the region and its visitors when the cars of Targa go on display on Saturday night in Strahan.

West Coast Mayor, Darryl Gerrity, who has lobbied for years to obtain a larger slice of the Targa pie, greeted the news with excitement.

“We have sat by and seen Targa just pass through the area for one day each year for the last 16 years, not complaining because we know of its great benefit to Tasmania as a whole. Now we will finally be rewarded for this loyalty with a direct financial return to the West Coast,” Gerrity said.

“It is great news for the tourism industry here and will see an extension of the peak season, which I’m sure will please many of the local operators”

Other parts of the course have been reviewed to ensure the safety of competitors and the motoring public, and to restrict long touring sections, particularly on the busy Midland Highway.

The result is that the overall length of the course has been reduced 10 per cent on last year.

With the course growing over recent years to more than 2,100 kilometres, research showed that a duty of care issue could be raised based on driver fatigue.

Perry, who has competed in Targa eight times, said safety was a vital issue in course design.

“Fatigue is a factor in many road accidents and the issue has been raised with us by numerous competitors concerned, not just for their own safety but that of everyday road users.”

“To travel over 2000ks in under a week is a big ask so we have made the decision to cut the overall length.”

“This change will also bring Targa into line with other events and reduce the need for long sections of touring.”

“So safety is enhanced and competitor satisfaction is also enhanced in reducing traveling distances between stages.”

“Competitors who make the trip to Tasmania come to enjoy our fantastic road network, and decreasing the ratio between competitive and non-competitive stages is vital as we face increasing competition from mainland events desperate to grab our mantle as the country’s leading tarmac rally.”

“By having a Launceston base for longer, we remove the event’s Achilles heel which saw competitors face the cost and logistical challenge of travelling to Hobart twice.”

“Instead they will complete loops in and out of Launceston on the first four days of the six day event. I’m sure the hospitality industry in Launceston and surrounding areas will welcome these two extra days of Targa with open arms,” said Perry.

Launceston Acting Mayor, Ald Jodie Campbell, shared Perry’s view.

“Having the extra days of Targa Tasmania in Launceston is fantastic news and not only will it bring millions of extra dollars into the city, it will give the people of our city more opportunity to enjoy the event.”

While Hobart will see fewer stages in 2008, they will be held on Sunday allowing more people greater opportunity to witness the spectacle.

Hobart will remain the administrative home of Targa Tasmania.

New Norfolk, who lost their street stage in 2007 due to safety concerns, will host its first lunch break on the final day, giving the residents a perfect opportunity on a Sunday to view the cars, while providing an economic boost to the local economy.

St Helens is another winner in 2007. Instead of simply watching the cars pass through as they have done in the past, the scenic East Coast town will host the luncheon break in the totally revamped Day 2 of competition (Thursday April 17).

Devonport will host a lunch stop bringing the cars and competitors to the heart of the City on April on Friday April 18.

Although Burnie will not host an overnight stop in 2008 for the first time, the North West Coast city will host its first lunch break to ensure that Targa continues to support the city.

Perry said the event was certainly not turning its back on the city.

“There is no doubt that people in Burnie will be disappointed with the change, but after sixteen years it was time to share some benefit around.”

“With Rally Tasmania also supporting Burnie heavily, with many cars attracted to that event as a warm-up to Targa, we felt it was time to drive our benefit into other regional areas. In saying that, we will be back in the years to come.”

Triabunna and the Huon/Channel area will also not receive a visit from Targa in 2008.

“In the case of Triabunna, we would like to look at how we can do it better without causing the current disruption to the town and its school. Added to this is the long touring required either side of the town, which is a concern. We hope to go back to Triabunna in the years ahead once we have assessed our options fully.”

“The home of the traditional Day 3 in the Huon/Channel area sees growing safety issues for the event.”

“As the years have ticked away there have been fewer suitable roads to use in the area. We totally understand and accept that roads can’t be upgraded just for one day a year but competitor safety is of paramount importance to the event.”

Targa will continue to visit George Town for the Temco Prologue and it is hoped that with West Tamar Council support another visit to Beaconsfield will also occur at the end of Day 1 of competition. Sheffield will again host the lunch on the opening day after a successful first stop this year.

“It is a fact that any change creates winners and losers, but it is time to share around the multi-million dollar economic benefit that Targa brings to Tasmania and to look at the big picture - ensuring the event’s appeal for many years to come.

“This course is the second phase of our new three course policy to ensure all communities gain some benefit over a three year period.”

2008 Course Summary

Day 0 - 15th April – Launceston - Temco Prologue at George Town - Launceston

Day 1 - 16th April - Launceston- Deloraine- Sheffield- Beaconsfield - Launceston (9 stages)

Day 2 - 17th April – Launceston – Scottsdale - St. Helens - Campbell Town- Launceston (9 stages)

Day 3 - 18th April – Launceston – Don – Longford - Launceston (8 stages)

Day 4 - 19th April – Launceston - Mole Creek - Burnie- Zeehan - Strahan (8 stages)

Day 5 - 20th April – Strahan – Queenstown - Tarraleah- New Norfolk - Hobart (6 stages)

Pot holes and gravel is EXACTLY what we like... four wheel drive to the fore!

BUT, with the roads degrading every year, more and more of the older, less easily handle cars are finding it difficult to stay on the road, therefore we seem to get more downgrades or just cars off, which is no good to anyone. Wouldn't you agree? Witness, what, 4 cars off on one corner at Oyster Cove this year?

Personally, I reckon it's a good move in theory. I HATED the long liason drive up north on day 4, then lunch, then attacking Cethana when you're just starting to get tired. Bloody dangerous IMO. I can see the point with regard to the "duty of care" mentioned.

Was it Oyster Cove or Cygnet? But 5 cars on 1 corner isn't good, neather was the 45min wait.

We seemed to be waiting all day for accidents, and it's the shortest day!

Edited by sav man
Pot holes, gravel?? Its a tarmac rally what do you expect!!!!

I was a Stage Safety Officer on the SunCoast Classic tarmac rally run recently up here on the Sunshine Coast. Part of that role is taking incident reports from competitors at the end of the stage. On my stage on Day 1, one of the Thoroughbred Touring guys in a Porsche GT3 RS compained to me that the stage was "too dangerous". When I asked why he said "There's gravel all over the road". My response; "Yeah, its a rally"

I was a Stage Safety Officer on the SunCoast Classic tarmac rally run recently up here on the Sunshine Coast. Part of that role is taking incident reports from competitors at the end of the stage. On my stage on Day 1, one of the Thoroughbred Touring guys in a Porsche GT3 RS compained to me that the stage was "too dangerous". When I asked why he said "There's gravel all over the road". My response; "Yeah, its a rally"

Didn't see Suncoast, but as the name suggests a tarmac rally is a TARMAC rally... not a licence for crews to cut or clip very single corner and throw crap everywhere, thats your quickest way for a field to loose classic and exotic cars. The ARCom Tarmac Rally Working Group have been through this issue a few months ago, but in this instance we are talking about roads that thanks to drainage issues or poor surfacing simply fall apart... why use a bumpy road when there is a smooth one!

I am still not over the moon about the changes. BUT after reading a lengthy response from Mr Benson I am satisfied it is at least for the right reasons.

Keeping costs down is great, also reducing transit time is great and the fact that there will still be a couple of south stages is some consolation at least.

If it brings more exotic and interesting cars (and people) to the event then I guess the changes are a good thing. As long as we get plenty of coverage for those of us that can't follow the circus around the state.

  • 3 weeks later...
As long as we get plenty of coverage for those of us that can't follow the circus around the state.

I think we do a pretty good job considering the logistics involved in getting upto 5 crews in and out of stages.

And then still being able to get all the days tapes back and a story written and cut by six 0'clock.... :P:P:(

  • 4 weeks later...

Well I dunno,

It will save us about 5k in logistics and accomadation.. but as the bulk of Tasmania's population is in the south, our commercial obligations have been comprimised...

Just as long as the Mercury has a decent snapper, we have a chance of getting in the daily...

gjm are now doing (and have been for a while) composite front bars for R32 (BNR) Think we have an order for one with a winch slot - not sure who that is for LOL

Anyhow I have voted with my actions. TT984 rides again.

Ciao

895 is in again. already 7 GT-R's entered :P , good to see Beable's dropped the dirty evo for their R34 :whistling: .

Greg Garwood is back in a 996 GT3 RS, he was out at Symmonds a month ago, the car is very quick.

Edited by sav man

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
    • @PranK can you elaborate further on the Colorlock Dye? The website has a lot of options. I'm sure you've done all the research. I have old genuine leather seats that I have bought various refurbing creams and such, but never a dye. Any info on how long it lasts? Does it wash out? Is it a hassle? What product do I actually need? Am I just buying this kit and following the steps the page advises or something else? https://www.colourlockaustralia.com.au/colourlock-leather-repair-kit-dye.html
    • These going to fit over the big brakes? I'd be reeeeeeeeaaaall hesitant to believe so.
    • The leather work properly stunned me. Again, I am thankful that the leather was in such good condition. I'm not sure what the indent is at the top of the passenger seat. Like somebody was sitting in it with a golf ball between their shoulders. The wheels are more grey than silver now and missing a lot of gloss.  Here's one with nice silver wheels.
    • It's amazing how well the works on the leather seats. Looks mint. Looking forward to see how you go with the wheels. They do suit the car! Gutter rash is easy to fix, but I'm curious about getting the colour done.
×
×
  • Create New...