Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I found these and i really like them and they also come in 18x8 and 18x9 - Advanti Acute

The car in the pic isn't mine, i found the pic on the net, the car already had the rims on, i just made the side skirts darker to see how the rims would suit my car.

what do u think?

post-28231-1170231006.jpg

post-28231-1170231043.jpg

I like the impuls - a few pics of some lines with silver and white wheel on them. I agree on the 19's - I think they need BIG rims to fill the guards.

Cheers

i too have a white R33 (stantard rims) i think that 2nd pic with the white and silver deep dish looks bloody mint!

where can i find these and the $????

i too have a white R33 (stantard rims) i think that 2nd pic with the white and silver deep dish looks bloody mint!

where can i find these and the $????

$1700 for 18's deep dish with new 275 rears and 255 fronts. 19 inch deep dish are $2400 with same width tyres. I wouldn't consider anything other than deep dish.

I think the one with the silver deep dish were 19's. I've been checking rims out for awhile so lots of emails to wheel companies!

Cheers

Mate if you like them then get them. Some people here will love them, other will hate them.

I think they look quite nice plus the dish adds alot to the look.

Just make sure you lower your car right on the tyre after you put them on :) Thats a must in my opinion.

I think I will get them, I'm just curious, does anyone have any idea how close the star/ center part come to the edge of the rim, I can't seem to find any side images only front shots, i'm hoping they they don't pop out

theres something i completely forgot to ask about, with the size that i want 18X8 AND 18X9 will the wheels look like there on an angle \, i see many cars on the road with after market rims and the wheels aren't straight.

would u still notice it if the car is not lowered?, btw, i decided to get the gmax enigma rims, there 18x8.5 and 18x9.5, so i'm hoping i won't notice much

post-28231-1170639552.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...