Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

whats a TD06 worth? sounds awsome. I also have heard of a TD05/6, anyone else heard of this? apparently good upgrade for RB25 and has very quick spool up with good top end, although full boost by 3grand from the 06!! damn isnt that as good as standard?

  • Replies 77
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi JMS is that you car on the Tilbrooks dyno graph on the "Which Trust Setup?" post?

If it is can you please have a look at the following table and let me know if it is close to what you have experienced...

At 7,000 rpm it has 300 rwkw

At 6,000 rpm it has 250 rwkw

At 5,000 rpm it has 195 rwkw

At 4,000 rpm it has 93 rwkw

That's an average of 210 rwkw.

To work this out I assumed on the dyno it was in 4th gear and running 27 kph per 1,000 rpm. I had to do this extrapolation because the graph did not show rpm.

I would appreciate your comments.

Actually got to drive the JMS 302rwkw GTST last night (thankyou Terry). I must say I was quite impressed. That car doesn't have the usual huge jap turbo sledge hammer effect at all ,but, was quite progressive power delivery. Very drivable even through tight cornering- no opps I boosted at the wrong time and did a 360! The turbo lag was noticable and took a slight change in driving style. Instead of just planting your foot for instant boost I had to change down a gear and use the revs. A familiar woooosh comes from anything over 3000rpm and a shove in the seat really takes effect after 3700rpm. The cars redline is set to 8000rpm which still provides ample rev range to play with. Would be lieing if I said I wasn`t grinning from ear to ear inside ( couldn`t let on to much that I`ve never driven a car with that much power b4 and Terry said he is a girl in the passinger seat) when I was frying the tyres all the way through second and third!- not enough road for fourth.

sidewaymambo- definately no instant throttle response if thats what your getting at. Extremely good compared to other cars "I`ve" driven with hiflo and big Jap turbos

Sydneykid- You seem to know better, how about you tell us what its like since you have never even seen the car. ciao

Guest Sir Bean
Originally posted by macka

TT anything that spools under 3K isnt going to produce alot of horsepower mate

This simply isn't ture. New generation turbochargers using variable turbine geometry and variable pitch turbines work to eliminate lag. They are more responsive and create higher boost pressures at lower engine speeds than conventional tubochargers by altering the internal geometry of the turbine housing. The boost pressure is optimized across the engine speed range by adjusting the guide vanes inside the turbine housing. At lower engine speeds, they restrict the flow and thus boost pressure is increased; at high engine speeds they open wide and the exhaust back-pressure falls, restoring top-end power.

These things would be simply awesome on the side of an RB.

I hope that brings people up to speed. No pun intended.

Originally posted by Sydneykid

Hi BOOSTD, did I read this right.....

"I was lookin a getting a trust TD06. Terry from JMS just installed one onto his Rb25 powered 32 and made 308rwkw @1.2bar and full boost a 3000rpm."

had another read, still says full boost at 3000

was replying to the quoted post not the above one, i must have been skipping around the thread a bit.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You won't need to do that if your happy to learn to tune it yourself. You 100% do not need to do that. It is not part of the learning process. It's not like driving on track and 'finding the limit by stepping over the limit'. You should not ever accidently blow up an engine and you should have setup the ECU's engine protection to save you from yourself while you are learning anyway. Plenty of us have tuned their own cars, myself included. We still come here for advice/guidance/new ideas etc.  What have you been doing so far to learn how to tune?
    • Put the ECU's MAP line in your mouth. Blow as hard as you can. You should be able to see about 10 kPa, maybe 15 kPa positive pressure. Suck on it. You should be able to generate a decent vacuum to about the same level also. Note that this is only ~2 psi either way. If the MAP is reading -5 psi all the time, ignition on, engine running or not, driving around or not, then it is severely f**ked. Also, you SHOULD NOT BE DRIVING IT WITHOUT A LOAD REFERENCE. You will break the engine. Badly.
    • Could be correct. Meter might be that far out. Compare against a known 5 ohm 1% resistor.
    • @Murray_Calavera  If I were an expert I wouldn't be in here looking for assistance.  I am extremely computer literate, have above average understanding on how things should be working and how they should tie together.  If I need to go to a professional tuner so be it, but I'd much rather learn and do things myself even if it means looking for some guidance along the way and blowing up a few engines. @GTSBoy  I was hoping it would be as simple as a large vacuum leak somewhere but I'm unable to find anything, all lines seem to be well capped or going where they need to be, and when removed there is vacuum felt on the tube.  It would be odd for the Haltech built in MAP to be faulty, the GTT tune I imported had it enabled from the start, I incorrectly assumed it was reading a signal from the stock MAP, but that doesn't exist.  After running a vacuum hose to the ECU the signal doesn't change more than 0.2 in either direction.   I'll probably upload a video of my settings tomorrow, as it stands I'm able to daily drive, but getting stuttering when giving it gas from idle, so pulling away from lights is a slow process of revving it up and feathering the clutch until its moving, then it will accelerate fine.  It sounds like I need to get to the bottom of the manifold pressure issue, but the ignition timing section is most intimidating to me and will probably let a pro do that part.  Tomorrow I'll try a different vacuum line to T off of, with any luck I selected one that was already bypassed during the DBW swap.  (edit: I went out and did it right now, the line I had chosen did appear to have no vacuum on it, it used to go to the front of the intake, I've now completely blocked that one off at the bracket that holds several vacuum lines by the firewall.  I T'd into the vacuum line that goes from that bracket to the vacuum pump at the front of the car, but no change in the MAP readings).  Using the new vacuum line that has obvious vacuum on the hose, im still only getting readings between -6.0 and -5.2.  I'm wondering why the ECU was detecting -5.3 when nothing was connected to the MAP nipple and ECU MAP selected as the source. @feartherb26  I do have +T in the works but wanted to wait until Spring to start with that swap since this is my good winter AWD vehicle.  When removing the butterfly, did it leave a bunch of holes in the manifold that you needed to plug?  I thought about removing it but assumed it would be a mess.   I notice no difference when capping the vacuum line to it or letting it do its thing.  This whole thing has convinced me to just get a forward facing manifold when the time comes though.
    • Update: tested my spark plugs that are supposed to be 5ohms with a 10% deviation and one gave me a 0 ohms reading and the rest were 3.9ohm<, so one bad and the others on their way out.
×
×
  • Create New...