Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ive had my s1 stag for 7 months now and want to get a s2. I started doing a few mods to the old girl then spoted this nice red S2 for 25 K. The mods i have done are hybrid r33 fmic ,apexi pod ,apexi 3 inch cat back exhaust and a s1 shift kit. both mine and the s2 have leather and are both fully optioned but mine has the twin sun roofs, auto start and a lugage fan , that never gets any use. is it worth upgrading and starting my mods all again? need some input :D not shure if its worth the extra cash . also anyone in wa looking for a s1 cos i will have to sell my one first.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/153249-thinking-of-upgrade-to-s2/
Share on other sites

thought about it, the main thing to change is th fmic and looking at the s2 it will be harder to install. anyone done a r33 intercooler that routs under the battery with a hole cut in the chassi for the s2..? also is 25 k to much for a s2 wit 77 thousand on the clock? the condition is quite good 1 small scratch on the paint and the car comes wit a 3 year warranty

Hey Jippa, theres an s2 on ebay, pretty cheap BUT it would need some new front panels. Good buying for an S1 owner such as yourself looking for the upgrades. Check it out .

post-30601-1169631888.jpg

Bidding starts at $4700.

love to get another project on the go but already got 3 cars in the driveway. one more and id be in the bad books wit the misses. just got rid of an fj 40 wreck that lived in the garage for 6 months as a spider breeding ground :D

Thats the choice I made a while ago, stick with S1 and convert to manual or sell and buy an S2 manual.

I love my car too much to sell it, and I've spent so much on it already that I won't recover in a sale, so I'm just going to keep making it better.

Also, it's way hard to find a manual stagea with leather and dual sunrooves, gotta have the class :P

apart from the inner gaurds being different and me not changing them, i needed to drill 2 new holes for the headlights. Otherwise, its a direct bolt on.

You will need to get an auto elec to rewire the lights too, but that only cost me $250. You need the plugs with the headlights.

apart from the inner gaurds being different and me not changing them, i needed to drill 2 new holes for the headlights. Otherwise, its a direct bolt on.

You will need to get an auto elec to rewire the lights too, but that only cost me $250. You need the plugs with the headlights.

you did a pretty good job too Alex in facelifting your ride man. Godd job!!

Easier to put Series 2 lights on an S1 than changing the whole front end :pwned:

Really? Bonnet, front guards and bumper are all very different S1 to S2, the lights are a completely different size and shape... I'd say it would be impossible to just change the lights over.

thought about it, the main thing to change is th fmic and looking at the s2 it will be harder to install. anyone done a r33 intercooler that routs under the battery with a hole cut in the chassi for the s2..?

I've done it to my S2 - put in a very large 'Monster' FMIC. It slipped straight in (didnt even need the vaseline).

Yeah, you have to cut a hole directly under the battery, but it misses all the vital bits. You will need to trim the front bumper where the in/out pipes connect to the IC. Plus (unfortunatley) the 'Neo' engine cover to accommodate the cross over pipe .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...