Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The information I have found on this sensor is pretty in-conclusive. Could someone set me straight on this ?

IS this a exhuast temperature sensor ?

What is its purpose in the miriad of processes involved in running the beasty 2.5lt donk ?

This question may be redundant but would it matter if I was to simply leave this sensor out ? I assume not perceptibly since i found A pair of posts stateing that they hadnt nticed anything but this isnt quite the fact i was looking for. maybe over time something could go bang so I ask.

This is currently a problem for me as I have recently aquired a wide body catco 3" cat to match my 3" cat back system and only need a front+dump aka batmbl revised version. ^^

the catco cat has no port for this sensor so I need to know if thats a problem, I also need to know where would be an equally good place to install the sensor should it be a requirement that is not in the cat, I dont want to hinder flow and havent seen the sensor itself out of the cat so i dont know if its going to cause a choke point... possibly why its in the cat to begin with ?

if the cat is the best for this reason, can i just drill a hole an tap a thread in or is there some part of hte cat process I could damage doing this, assuming there is a chemical reaction going on in the cat to change gasses and prevent the toxicity shite aka the point of having a cat in the first place.

new cat... what to do ?

so pro's / con's of removing would be something helpful.

also in hte future a second hand pfc or equiv management system will eventually go in, will this sensor be of use to the tunning process or the day to day running on a non factory ecu? will they make use of it ?

links in various directions could help me...

cheers

Thanks guys.

Am I likely to get to a range of heat. in my exhuast that could cuase a problem ? Im assuming this is some sort of indicator of how hot the engine is running / burning ? oil temps probably being a lot more relevant, but what would this be providing a warning for ? if the exhuast is hot i doubt it will likely get to a point where this would cuase some issues. I dont know enough about it to judge that this is a safe risk to run unprotected, I dont believe it to be likely but what risks are involved... i might be a wet blanket but i wana be sure im taking an acceptable risk something isnt going to pop due to me removing something.

I've run all my cars (4 years) without the sensor.

When i say nothing will be affected, i mean it :sick:

The sensor is only there, if i recall correctly, to tell you if the cat is overheating due to mixtures not being right in the factory setup.

You are no longer running a factory setup, so it does not matter.

Thanks guys.

Am I likely to get to a range of heat. in my exhuast that could cuase a problem ? Im assuming this is some sort of indicator of how hot the engine is running / burning ? oil temps probably being a lot more relevant, but what would this be providing a warning for ? if the exhuast is hot i doubt it will likely get to a point where this would cuase some issues. I dont know enough about it to judge that this is a safe risk to run unprotected, I dont believe it to be likely but what risks are involved... i might be a wet blanket but i wana be sure im taking an acceptable risk something isnt going to pop due to me removing something.

The temp warning is for the cat - the idea being, if the cat gets blocked by one means or another the temperature

on the upstream side will go way up. View it as a health-of-cat sensor. Exhaust shops use this as a means of

gauging just how blocked your cat is :)

If you delete it you won't do any harm as long as you're cat's not blocked.

Regards,

Saliya

I've run all my cars (4 years) without the sensor.

When i say nothing will be affected, i mean it :laugh:

The sensor is only there, if i recall correctly, to tell you if the cat is overheating due to mixtures not being right in the factory setup.

You are no longer running a factory setup, so it does not matter.

Same here for me, 3 different cars and never had a problem not running it.

I had it in my old track car and the only time i used to see the light was when the car was warming up on idle on the dummy grid.

Yank the sucker out, put in your new unrestricting cat and enjoy :miner:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Get an inspection camera up there. 
    • Yeah, but look at the margin in viscosity between the 40 and the 60 at 125°C. It is not very large. It is the difference between 7 and 11 cP. Compare that to the viscosity at only 90°C. The viscosity axis is logarithmic. The numbers at 90 are ~15 and ~35. That is about half for the 40 wt oil and <half for the 60. You give up viscosity EXPONENTIALLY as temperature rises. Literally. That is why I declare thicker oil to be a bandaid, and a brittle one at that. Keep the oil temperature under about 110°C and you should be better off.   Having said all of that, which remains true as a general principle, if you have indeed lost enough oil from the sump that the pump was seeing slightly aerated oil, then all bets are off. That would of course cause oil pressure to collapse. And 35 psi is a collapse given what you were doing to the engine. Especially if the oil was that hot and viscosity had also collapsed. And I would put money on rod or main bearings being the source of the any noise that registered as knock. Hydraulic lifters should be able to cope with the hotter oil and lower pressure enough to prvent too much high frequency noise, although I am willing to admit it could be the source.
    • Thanks for the reply mate. Well I really hope its a hose then not engine out job
    • But.... the reason I want to run a 60 weight is so at 125C it has the same viscosity as a 40 weight at 100C. That's the whole reason. If the viscosity changes that much to drop oil pressure from 73psi to 36psi then that's another reason I should be running an oil that mimics the 40 weight at 100C. I have datalogs from the dyno with the oil pressure hitting 73psi at full throttle/high RPM. At the dyno the oil temp was around 100-105C. The pump has a 70psi internal relief spring. It will never go/can't go above 70psi. The GM recommendation of 6psi per 1000rpm is well under that... The oil sensor for logging in LS's is at the valley plate at the back of  the block/rear of where the heads are near the firewall. It's also where the knock sensors are which are notable for 'false knock'. I'm hoping I just didn't have enough oil up top causing some chatter instead of rods being sad (big hopium/copium I know) LS's definitely heat up the oil more than RB's do, the stock vettes for example will hit 300F(150C) in a lap or two and happily track for years and years. This is the same oil cooler that I had when I was in RB land, being the Setrab 25 row oil cooler HEL thing. I did think about putting a fan in there to pull air out more, though I don't know if that will actually help in huge load situations with lots of speed. I think when I had the auto cooler. The leak is where the block runs to the oil cooler lines, the OEM/Dash oil pressure sender is connected at that junction and is what broke. I'm actually quite curious to see how much oil in total capacity is actually left in the engine. As it currently stands I'm waiting on that bush to adapt the sender to it. The sump is still full (?) of oil and the lines and accusump have been drained, but the filter and block are off. I suspect there's maybe less than 1/2 the total capacity there should be in there. I have noticed in the past that topping up oil has improved oil pressure, as reported by the dash sensor. This is all extremely sketchy hence wanting to get it sorted out lol.
×
×
  • Create New...