Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

These Audi belts are 22mm wide, whereas the OEM nissan belt is 25mm. Would it be fair to assume it is 12% weaker than the factory nissan belt?

If you change the timing belts more frequently there would be less chance of a failure.

Cam. Belt; W/152 Tooth Belt  

Automotive Timing Belt T291 Interference engine application    

 Cam. Belt; W/153 Tooth Belt  

Automotive Timing Belt T317 Interference engine application    

 Cam. Belt; W/150 Tooth Belt  

Automotive Timing Belt T306 Interference engine application    

I used the 2000 Gates catalogue that I have, It doesn't list the above.

I received my belt a few days ago, It's says it replaces a T866.

Mine is 25mm wide, has 152 teeth, the same listed in the 2000 catalogue.

see attached pic

The information on that link seems kind of limited.

I don't trust the net when it comes to these things, I'd prefer the catalogue in book form and some good old measuring and counting of teeth. :D

Another thing i can say, that T866 is the bosch part no for the belt above to suit the 1.8L quatro 96+

I suppose if you want a price on the belt go ask for BT866 if bosch is any cheaper than dayco or easier to get in your local stores....

I suppose if you want a price on the belt go ask for BT866 if bosch is any cheaper than dayco or easier to get in your local stores....

Bosch belts aren't sold in many auto shops(repco,supercheap,autobahn,auto one etc..) these days it's mostly Dayco.

For $37(Dayco) a timing belt for an 96 audi is pretty damn cheap .

Your right about the T numbers thats bosch, everyone uses bosch numbers as a crossreference even repco do.

BlackR32, it doesn't look like your mounts are modded? Am I missing something or did you just post pics of them bolted in the stock position?

:)

Those pics were taken a day or so before it got modded unfortunatly. The drivers side just required redirlling the holes in a higher spot, the passenger side mount was cut and re welded as far as i can remember....;)

Those pics were taken a day or so before it got modded unfortunatly. The drivers side just required redirlling the holes in a higher spot, the passenger side mount was cut and re welded as far as i can remember....:)

Cool. I am doing mine this weekend. Looks simple. I am using the RB30 mounts.

Hey Guys,

Just lookin to confirm something.

When i measured the restrictor in the block for the VCT feed, i reckon its about 1.2mm.

If i drill it 1.5mm will it be supplied to much oil? Will it get flooded or leak out the cam seal, or will it just drain back to the sump any excess oil?

If i drill it 1.0mm it probally won't be big enough and may starve it of oil and may not have the capacity to operate the VCT fucntion.

What size hole did you guys drill for the restrictor?

Thanks in advance

Mick

Can you/anyone confirm if its 1.2mm approx?

Will it be a problem if its a little bit bigger anyone know?

You should double checkthe size of the VCT oil gallery in your own head, you may find that there may be small variances. That goes for everything else too double check the measurements on your engine.

Making it slightly bigger in dia shouldnt make much of a difference, the sensor relies on oil pressure not flow. It may take longer to fill the oil gallery but once it's full (ie start up) it will operate as normal.

Yes it is approx. 1.2mm. I don't know if bigger will cause problems though. Mine was drilled at 1.2mm and it works fine.

Slightly off track, but i had a play with switch-on point in the Haltech and turned VCT on at idle. You can notice a big difference in idle quality. It didn't want to idle smooth at all.

Yes it is approx. 1.2mm. I don't know if bigger will cause problems though. Mine was drilled at 1.2mm and it works fine.

Slightly off track, but i had a play with switch-on point in the Haltech and turned VCT on at idle. You can notice a big difference in idle quality. It didn't want to idle smooth at all.

Thanks for confirmation

:D

MonstaS4,

Camy lump idle with it vct on at idle?

How is the swtich on point with the RB30?

Does it appear to be a benifit to drop the rpm where VCT is turned on?

Theoretically it should as the RB30 is pushing more air at a lower rpm.

Yep, with 20 degrees extra overlap when it's switched on, i guess you could say it's a little lumpy.

Seat of pants/Stopwatch testing indicates somewhere around 4200rpm seems optimum. There dosn't appear to be big benifit to be had, but i'm still only running 5psi. 14+psi may tell a different story?

guys i bought a 2nd skyline a this time a gts to see wat kinda power i cud make , sum1 suggested to me to get a rb30 bottom end and rb25 head while i save and get a rb26 head later, what kinda power can it make with a rb30 bottom end and rb25de head?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...