Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

thanks very very much cube's.

i bought the pump as it was advertised as a brand new vl turbo pump.

but when i got my old vlt one to compare,i found they are completely different internals.

wasnt happy.

but looks like the pump i got is an rb25det one.

anyone want to buy it?

hehe

Just trying to finalise a few parts for my conversion - sorry if these have been answered somewhere else, I did search!

- What is the difference between series 1 and series 2 rb25DET's ? I'm looking at buying a splitfire ignition system instead of coilpacks and they have a model for each - this is going in a VL with an aftermarket ECU, so is it even applicable? On a similar note, is the wiring loom the same for these series 1 and 2 engines?

- I'm going to be running a powerFC, are they able to be tuned without an AFM? Or does it still rely on that (as far as I can tell it does). If that's the case - what AFM will have enough scope to cover things (engine builder was suggesting a twin AFM arrangement, but that sounds more complicated than it needs to be IMO).

- Can someone explain exactly what has to happen to the block and/or head when fitting an RB25DET head onto the rb30 block, a detailed explaination would be great.

So far I'll be using the stock head, turbo/manifolds (will have the loom + coilpacks), a computer and obviously upgrading any old parts where needed. Is there any hidden items I've missed that I should be budgeting for (not accounting for things like piping, etc)?

Cheers guys - this thread is a life saver :P

Just trying to finalise a few parts for my conversion - sorry if these have been answered somewhere else, I did search!

1. What is the difference between series 1 and series 2 rb25DET's ?

2. this is going in a VL with an aftermarket ECU, so is it even applicable?

3. On a similar note, is the wiring loom the same for these series 1 and 2 engines?

4. I'm going to be running a powerFC, are they able to be tuned without an AFM? Or does it still rely on that (as far as I can tell it does).

5. If that's the case - what AFM will have enough scope to cover things (engine builder was suggesting a twin AFM arrangement, but that sounds more complicated than it needs to be IMO).

6. Can someone explain exactly what has to happen to the block and/or head when fitting an RB25DET head onto the rb30 block, a detailed explaination would be great.

7. So far I'll be using the stock head, turbo/manifolds (will have the loom + coilpacks), a computer and obviously upgrading any old parts where needed. Is there any hidden items I've missed that I should be budgeting for (not accounting for things like piping, etc)?

Cheers guys - this thread is a life saver :P

Much easier if you number you questions;

1. As Ben said S1 has a separate ignitor module, S2 has ignitors built int oeach coil.

2. Chassis is irrelevant, the only thing that matters is the wiring harness, use the coils that go with the wiring harness and the ECU.

3. No

4. No

5. You can use a single Q45 AFM (90 mm), so far good for 420+ rwkw

6. No way, read the thread there are so many choices, pick the one that you like. Read the How to Guide it's simpler/shorter.

7. The list (tick off what you already have). Intercooler, radiator, exhaust, intercooler pipework, power steering, air con, engine mounts, oil cooler, turbo/turbos, turbo water and oil fittings, air filter, AFM to turbo pipework, gaskets, decent sump (wings, one way doors and baffles are best), boost controller, Power FC, injectors, fuel pump, fuel pressure regulator, radiator hoses, belts, water pump, oil pump, clutch, gearbox, tailshaft, diff, brakes, suspension, wheels, tyres, gauges etc etc

Good luck:cheers:

Cheers :D

2. Chassis is irrelevant, the only thing that matters is the wiring harness, use the coils that go with the wiring harness and the ECU.

I thought the series1/2 differences may not have been related to the actual head itself. My point being, if I used a series 1 loom on a series two engine or vice versa would it work? :)

5. You can use a single Q45 AFM (90 mm), so far good for 420+ rwkw

Ah great - I'll keep an eye out for one

6. No way, read the thread there are so many choices, pick the one that you like.  Read the How to Guide it's simpler/shorter.

hehe, I've got the how-to guide and it doesn't cover the actual nitty-gritty, just mentioned it has to be 'modified' and has a picture comparing the two blocks. I guess I'll leave that up to the engine builder.

7.  The list (tick off what you already have).  Intercooler, radiator, exhaust, intercooler pipework, power steering, air con, engine mounts, oil cooler, turbo/turbos, turbo water and oil fittings, air filter, AFM to turbo pipework, gaskets, decent sump (wings, one way doors and baffles are best), boost controller, Power FC, injectors, fuel pump, fuel pressure regulator, radiator hoses, belts, water pump, oil pump, clutch, gearbox, tailshaft, diff, brakes, suspension, wheels, tyres, gauges etc etc

lol cheers mate (definatly has wheels and suspension last I checked :P) ;) I think I can check off almost everything there, although I do need to replace the oil/water pumps :)

you sure? the coilpacks on a S1 have an external ignitor so the loom must be different......

sorry yes the externals are different like coil pack....I mean the actual heads themselves are interchangable. I put a S1 motor into an S2 car using the S2 ignition with no problems

yeah i was maybe hoping to get closer to 350 but ohwel. with ebc said should be around 315kw.

arias pisons

mild port & polished head (standard cams)

gt35 turbo

50mm ex gate

600cc injectors

wollf 3d

044 pump

custom plenum

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There are advantages, and disadvantages to remapping the factory.   The factory runs billions of different maps, to account for sooooo many variables, especially when you bring in things like constantly variable cams etc. By remapping all those maps appropriately, you can get the car to drive so damn nicely, and very much so like it does from the factory. This means it can utilise a LOT of weird things in the maps, to alter how it drives in situations like cruise on a freeway, and how that will get your fuel economy right down.   I haven't seen an aftermarket ECU that truly has THAT MANY adjustable parameters. EG, the VAG ECUs are somewhere around 2,000 different tables for it to work out what to do at any one point in time. So for a vehicle being daily driven etc, I see this as a great advantage, but it does mean spending a bit more time, and with a tuner who really knows that ECU.   On the flip side, an aftermarket ECU, in something like a weekender, or a proper race car, torque based tuning IMO doesn't make that much sense. In those scenarios you're not out there hunting down stuff like "the best way to minimise fuel usage at minor power so that we can go from 8L/100km to 7.3L/100km. You're more worried about it being ready to make as much freaking power as possible when you step back on the loud pedal as you come out of turn 2, not waiting the extra 100ms for all the cams to adjust etc. So in this scenario, realistically you tune the motor to make power, based on the load. People will then play with things like throttle response, and drive by wire mapping to get it more "driveable".   Funnily enough, I was watching something Finnegans Garage, and he has a huge blown Hemi in a 9 second 1955 Chev that is road registered. To make it more driveable on the road recently, they started testing blocking up the intake with kids footballs, to effectively reduce air flow when they're on the road, and make the throttle less touchy and more driveable. Plus some other weird shit the yankee aftermarket ECUs do. Made me think of Kinks R34...
    • I do this, I also don't get the joke  
    • Return flow cooler will be killing you I reckon. You can certainly push more through a low mount setup but they're good numbers for a stock looking engine bay.  Mine made 345rwkw (hub) at 22psi on 98 with a "highflow" on a stock manifold but it's a long way from a normal high flow or standard engine. I used one of those Turbosmart IWG-75's and it was great with the Motec running closed loop boost with pressure being applied to both sides of the diaphragm. 
    • Hey man do you have pic of adaptor plate by any chance I need to match up the bolt holes as my gearbox adaptor plate ones are way off the only bolts of starter motor are matching thanks 
    • Do they always do it from the AFM? If so... You know what I'm already thinking I reckon...
×
×
  • Create New...