Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

for the 32 and 31 owners...

what are the legalities in respect to displacement increase?

i know this was discussed by the 33 owners but i am concered that upgrading from a 2L to a 3L may cause problems...

does anyone know information about this, specifically for QLD?

Hi Guys, R31's come with 3 litres, so I don't think that's a problem. R32's come with 2.5 and 2.6 litre engines, so I don't believe 3 litres (20% & 15% increases) would be a problem either. R33's with 2.5 litres and 2.6 litres are certainly not a problem as there are a number of 3 litre ones already registered.

Previous experience with non Skylines in a number of states, is that the rego authorities base their capacity increase calc's on the largest capacity engine available in that model. For example I have registered a 5.7 litre Commondoor that originally came with a 3 litre, because there was a 5 litre available.

I would suggest that you check this with your local authorities.

Hope that helps.

I was told the same about motor size in qld, that it is based off the largest engine fitted to the vehicle, thus an R32 came with a 2.6l, so you should be fine. I *think* that you can have a 50% increase in capacity (it's been a while since i checked it out) thus a R32 could go up to 3.9L.

However you would need to have the brakes and suspension of that larger engined model (ie, a 32 GTS-T would need 32 GTR brakes and suspension *or* something deemed equivalent or greater by an engineer.

However, apparently the strict letter of the law (in QLD) is that any engine conversion is only allowed to have 10% more power than the original engine in that vehicle. I was also told however that as the dept of transport / inspecting engineer doesn't actually do before and after engine dyno runs, there is really no way of them knowing if you meet this requirement, and as long as the conversion is properly engineered (once again deemed by an engineer), then the modification will most likely be approved.

I'm not sure how much detail you have to go into to actually get the mods approved (i shall find out in a few months i guess), but i think it is mainly at the discretion of the inspecting engineer. Basically if they deem the mods to be safe, ie structurally sound, and not impeding any of the safety systems of the car, then there shouldn't be too many problems.

The RB30DE Makes around the same power as a RB20DET and thats with a low 8.3:1 cr in the non turbo motor. So approx 150-160kw at the flywheel for a RB30DE. Thats the same as a Stock VS V8 5ltr.

According to a conversion done that was in one of those zoom mags.

I seriously doubt that it is only a 10% power gain as when i fitted my exhaust i picked up around 15-20%.

my HR31 came from factory with an RB20det... so would it still be classed as an R31 with the largest engine capacity as 3L

also does the RB20det runners and plenum bolt straight on to the RB25 head.. if so this would give a "stock" RB20det look

Hi all

Joel the exhaust was tight but because i only have a rear muffler it bolted up without hassle ,its quite tight to the floor and knocks on the floorpan when the car is started ,will be changed soon as the things too bloody loud and the police can instant off the road for loud exhausts in NZ now!

GUYS

regardless of weather you want the VVT you dont have an option , as the RB30 block has only 2 oil feed ports to the head (the RB25 has 3) you have to supply oil to the inlet Cam front bearing Journal and the only way it can be feed is via the vvt Gallery, even with after market cams .

cheers

Originally posted by Steve

Joel, do they require dyno printouts for engine power, or just work off what the factory rated the engine at when new?

where did you get he power figures from, the 5L figure seems a bit low, as the ford 4L puts out about 180odd kw.

Regarding the first question.. I have no idea who they is :(

That is the new ford 4l that puts out that much power.

We are talking back in the days of 1992+ when the old holden V8 5ltr EFI was around. When I looked up the specs for the standard VS 1996 exec 5ltr manual commodore it said 165kw I think actually .... but yer 160kw close enough. They only pull 110rwkw stock so the R32 Skyline pulls roughly the same.

Originally posted by -Joel-

Regarding the first question.. I have no idea who they is :(

That is the new ford 4l that puts out that much power.

We are talking back in the days of 1992+ when the old holden V8 5ltr EFI was around. When I looked up the specs for the standard VS 1996 exec 5ltr manual commodore it said 165kw I think actually .... but yer 160kw close enough. They only pull 110rwkw stock so the R32 Skyline pulls roughly the same.

you said that you seriously doubt the power gain is 10%..... that was in reference to the lisencing of an upgrade engine??? (sorry if I interperated this wrong) - they are the licensing dept.

My 98 ford had from memory 184kw stock - 4L, that is what the factory rated them to the predecessor had something like 168kw. Even the blown v6 that commodore release was well above 160kw, just wondering where you looked up the specs, becuase it seems weird that holden would rate their 5l below fords 4l and their own 3.6 with supercharger.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • When you crank your car, and hit it with a timing light, can you see a steady crank timing?
    • Oh, forgot to add, A few months ago I was getting mixture codes and the car was using crap loads of fuel. You could smell the unburned fuel in the exhaust, it was crazy strong. Economy was over 17.5 l/100 and usually around 19. I smoked the engine and found a leaky CCV hose which I replaced and then I replaced my two pre cat O2 sensors, I also replaced the MAF. This fixed my mixture codes and improved my exonomy but I'm still 14 - 15 l/100 when pottering about town so something is still amiss. Throttle response is much better and it has more pep but I'd like to know why it's still so thirsty (and I'm hoping that whatever it is gives me a bit more poke).    
    • Car is on factory injectors/z32 maf/ q45 throttle body/ z32 ecu with nistune 
    • Hello all, currently finishing up a rb25 swap into my s14. Having issues with starting, car has spark (confirmed by pulling a plug and watching it spark), has fuel(confirmed by checking pulse/voltage at injectors all spark plugs are soaked in fuel). Car cranks over and pops into the exhaust with a heavy fuel smell but no attempt to start or run, I have torn the timing cover off and triple confirmed timing, turned the CAS in multiple spots both directions, attempted to start with coolant temp and maf unplugged, checked my fuel lines and made sure they weren’t backwards, checked voltage at cas/injectors/coilpacks, made sure all the grounds in the harness are connected and added a few grounding straps (1 from chassis to block, 1 from chassis to head, and 1 from chassis to igniter chip) I am getting stumped here. As a last ditch effort I made a full grounding harness tonight that’s going to run from the battery and add an extra ground from the battery onto the coil pack harness/igniter chip/ intake manifold/ Wiring specialties harness ground/ and alternator. I’m hoping maybe the grounding harness will fix it here but posting here to see if anyone has any other ideas on what else I can check. My fuel pressure is unknown right gauge will be here tomorrow.  IMG_3206.mov
    • yeah I was shocked when I checked my spare OEM on and as below that's how they come from Nissan. (side interesting note new NEO gearbox and replacement park lack the brass bush on the tips and its just all alloy) unsure about damage to the box currently back at 1110 to be pulled down/inspected and selector fork replaced as he built it previously and given the never before seen failure on his billet forks he is replacing it under warranty. He said he has used always OEM the keyway tab without issue for years so it could be an unlucky coincidence. I did talk to him about the sharp corners and stress concentration too. Re: hard shifts i got 7+ years out of the OEM one and the fork itself failed not the keyway. so could be bad luck as I said or an age thing + heat cycles in box and during fabrication of billet?
×
×
  • Create New...