Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

My crank has been balanced and all the rest of it, and it regularly see's 7500rpm.

I know of one running to 9000rpm running a factory (abeit modified) crank.

Anything past 7-7500 and I think you'd need to look at aftermarket rods.

Cheers,

matt

hey guys,

anyone looked into the safe RPM limit of an RB30?

I have spoken to someone who said that anywhere over 6600rpm is asking for trouble. I was looking at using a 7000rpm limit, but was told i would be treading lightly on reliability.

any info?

what about a viscous-filled harmonic balancer?

i had/have the option to go for eagle rods, but i have been told they are heavier than standard, altho stronger.

prepped arb30 rods would be easier to source in the event of a breakage too i would imagine... and more cost effective

if you have rods, and pistons all balanced with the crank and flywheel/clutch then you should be able to take it past 7500 no problem. But the power levels will be big well before 7500rpm so you don't really need to take it past that. An Rb25 harmonic balancer is also a good idea, but as sydneykid will tell you, he uses new RB30 ones with no problems!

Andrew

Re: visous balancer - not too sure.

If you can afford it, I'd go the aftermarket rods just for that extra piece of mind.

If you really want to rev hard, spend the $$ and get the crank balanced too.

Can I ask why you're concerned with reving to 7500rpm?

My motor makes peak power around 5800-6000rpm and thats with bigger cams and a turbo that'll flow roughly 700hp. They don't need to rev as hard as a 26 to make power.

Cheers,

matt

All motors have inherant harmonic issues, so you can't single out the RB30. You'll notice that anyone building up a "decent" modified V8 has plenty of aftermarket harmonic balancers to choose from, and this part is generally always changed.

Unfortunatley, the options from Japan for the RBxx series are the ATI/HKS fluid damper ($1200), the Greddy billet alluminium hub (no balancer, ~$600) or a Route 66 rubber damper ($1000). The ATI item is the best available, buying it through HKS also gives you the pulleys, if you go direct to ATI you can get it a hell of alot cheaper but no pulleys (go go Gadget fabrication) and there are 8 or to choose from with alloy or steel shells.

Having said that, there are plenty of RBxx motors using a standard one without any dramas. However, at high RPMs I think that the harmonic balancer contributes to oil pump failure and also crank damage - I've seen a few RB26 cranks with the keyway split or the hub for the oilpump damaged.

So I guess you can add this part for a no-holds-barred, no beg-your-pardon's type motor. But it's not a necessity.

i just wanted to make sure i could take it to 7000rpm limit and not be shattering any oil pumps :( I would like to go forged rods but have heard melancholy stories about eagle rods and cannot afford 2k for carillio/argo's.

On an RB30 i would consider anything over 8000rpm as high revs. From the reading i've done, anything under that i fine. An RB26 i would consider over 9000rpm as high revs.

RB25 balancer will go on the RB30. All RB balancers do (i've been told by people i believe). I will know for certain in a week or so :(

Andrew

All inline 6 cylinder engines are internally balanced, therefore the clutch and harmonic balancer do not have to "carry over" any external weighting and are neutrally balanced.

Looking at an RB26 vs an RB30 balancer there is not much external difference, but given the fact that the RB26/25 are a later model motor I would assume that they are both a) made from better materials and processes and B) there is less chance of the rubber cushioning material to be damaged since it should be a lower mileage motor.

It all comes down to the fact, how much horsepower can you afford to make?

edit: all the RB series are interchangable, from harmonic balancers to flywheels/clutches.

From every one I've spoke to who have built high reving RB30's and making over 700hp they all tend to change (or stiffen up) the bottom end by using an aftermarket cradle & different re-inforced sump.

Apparently by stiffening up the bottom end it shifts the harmonic issues higher in the rpm range that will never be touched.

Not once was it mentioned people playing around with harmonic balancers.

?!?!?!

Oh - I forgot to mention - the RB30 I mentioned earlier which rev's to 9000rpm (and makes 800-850hp) was a GTR - so the bottom end is stiffer because of the front diff. The torque is what warps the blocks though - not the revs. Although I haven't heard of any twin cam RB30's doing that.

On another note - what are people doing with the head studs? I'm still using factory ones - but has anyone gone bigger?

Cheers,

matt

From every one I've spoke to who have built high reving RB30's and making over 700hp they all tend to change (or stiffen up) the bottom end by using an aftermarket cradle & different re-inforced sump.

The RB25 and RB30 harmonic balancers, whilst being physically interchangeable appear to have a different construction as already mentioned. However the point of interest is that they also have consequently different states of harmonic tune as they have differing effective weighting on the damper section. Speculating, one would assume it is to compensate for the different harmonic characteristics of the different cranks i.e. the RB30 is a longer stroke than the RB25. I have long wondered about the harmonic issue talked about at 7500 RPM, but it seems no one has ever done a proper test to see what exactly is going on. Is it a TORSIONAL harmonic issue? Is it a BENDING moment issue? Anyone ever had a close look at the damper used on the Autospeed monster RB30 by Nispro? That looks like it has substantially more mass to it on the damper ring.

For my long serving RB25/30 I used the RB30 balancer with no apparent long term effects, and a strictly enforced 7000 RPM limit. Without testing though I can't say wether or not it was the right decision.

The "AFM = restriction" is a myth, you just have to have the right sized one for your application.  Spread the word.

not so much the afm , but the rest of the inlet piping may cause a very high restriction , as seen on the test on the vl turbos inlet on autospeed.

but i agree with u , correct size of afm for ur application and it wont hinder anything.

 

On another note - what are people doing with the head studs? I'm still using factory ones - but has anyone gone bigger?

 

Cheers,

 

matt

why does everyone rave on about head studs , why not use the original stretch bolts , but use a torque to yeild ratio when tourqing them down. instead of just bolting it down to the specs in a work book.

sydneykid - do u agree with me or do u see no need for it?

and as for rod bolts , im still not sure if arp make ones to suit an rb30 rod , though a simple way around it is using sr20 bolts , just need to buy 2 sets (as there is four pairs in one set , 4 cyl's of course)

I was curious more than anything else... As I mentioned - my car still uses factory ones.

Re: rod bolts - not too sure about ARP bolts, but I've got Tomei rod bolts which are around about the same price.

Cheers,

matt

why does everyone rave on about head studs , why not use the original stretch bolts , but use a torque to yeild ratio when tourqing them down. instead of just bolting it down to the specs in a work book.

sydneykid - do u agree with me or do u see no need for it?

and as for rod bolts , im still not sure if arp make ones to suit an rb30 rod , though a simple way around it is using sr20 bolts , just need to buy 2 sets (as there is four pairs in one set , 4 cyl's of course)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have been being VERY quiet about what you're alluding to, as it is something that ticks me off... The number of cars from factory that run coil overs is HUGE! Most of them these days do... The other part that annoys me, is people saying "Well all the incabin adjustable suspension is illegal by blah blah blah"... If that's the case, then why can I buy a car brand new that can do it if, FULL STOP in cabin adjustable suspension is illegal...   Also, I could just chuck some aftermarket shocks in my car, throw the stock springs on, after my blue slip, dump my super low springs back in. Same shock and spring style setup... Hell, they could also be the same colour springs etc.     I'm voting, BlueSlipper didn't want to touch the above car for some reason. Whether it be some sort of bias against the car, the owner, them maybe having previously done dodgy shit and now they're being super careful in case they get slapped in the face by the Gumbyment again... Find a new blueslip place.   And can confirm as you had said, yes there are holy bibles of vehicle heights, and all sorts of other suspension stuff. Heck your run of the mill mechanic, and tyre shop has access to all of that stuff. It's how they do wheel alignments...
    • Funny story Heading to Sydney this morning on the HWY there was some slow traffic, so I gave it the beans and midway through my overtaking "power run" I lost all power It seems that I missed a hose clamp,  and the MAF and filter went WiFi To make this more problematic, the little tool kit that lives in the boot, is sitting in the sun room at Goulburn......LOL Luckily for me I found a bit of steel on the side of the road that could be used like a rusty and bent flat head screw driver to tighten it up enough that it got me into Sydney, it is now all tight like a tiger with the aid of a 8mm socket Note to self: Use my brain and double check stuff, and always keep that little tool kit in the car for when I have a brain fart
    • Oh, and as for everyone with their fuel economy changes, I switch between E10 and 98 in the company car. Even do when I had personal cars that could run on E10. You know what changed my fuel economy in any noticeable way? How I drove, and where I drove. Otherwise, say on full tanks of just back and forth from work only (So same trips, same sort of traffic), couldn't notice a difference that I can correlate to the type of fuel in use. In the current vehicle, that's over 42L of USABLE fuel. While 98 is all "more energy dense", it also has higher knock resistance as it takes more energy to get it to ignite too. The longer hydrocarbons, typically more tightly bound. So running the same ignition map, can also produce less power, if there isn't enough time to get it all burnt through properly, as yep, the flame propagation speed is different from lower octane fuel to higher (Higher has a lower flame propagation, due to the more tightly bound and harder to self ignite funs. This is also typically where, a vehicle that is designed purely to run on 91 (Whether it be E10 or normal 91) usually sees absolutely no real world difference in fuel economy for the normal man, woman, or dog.
    • We've got some servos around me that have 91 with E10, 91 (no E10), 95, and 98. At those stations the change from 91 E10 to 91, is typically around 8c/L.   But lets not get started on the price of fuel in Oz. It's ridiculous. All the service stations around me, bar one, the price of fuel has been over the $2 mark per litre for the cheapest, 98 being around $2.45. That one service station is a CostCo, fuel from it comes from the same refineries, and makes no pitstops, it runs great, including the 98. In fact, I've had no issues on CostCo fuel, but plenty of issues at other stations!. The CostCo fuel, was $1.65 roughly this week for 94 with E10. $1.88 for 98. Servos directly across from it, $2.10 for 91 E10, and $2.48 for 98. The part I had to laugh at? If I drive multiple HOURS away from Brisbane, say out near Nanango, or Kingaroy, or even out to Goondiwindi, the price of their fuel, is the same as what it is at the CostCo... Oh, and that BP servo at Goondiwindi is HUGE and goes through epic turnover of fuel, so it's not sitting there for weeks going to shit. And what blows me away, my mate is one of the people who drives the Fuel Tanker all around QLD, delivering to all those places. At the same company his previous role was doing the "local haul" deliveries... Same truck, same driver, same pickup point it all comes from. So you tell me, how the hell it is 60c/L CHEAPER for fuel, when nearly all else is equal, except they require a B-Double to drive half a day out of Brisbane, and half a day back, every second day, compared to the delivery that can be under 30 minutes drive from the fuel pickup point... Not to mention, go five blocks down the road, and Ampol to Ampol will vary 30c/L... And I've had this conversation with my mate... The way it's priced, is just typical, pure and utter rubbish... He also does runs from Brisbane, to all over QLD, down to Newcastle, Sydney, Nowra, Melbourne, Geelong, and even out to parts of the NT depending on the companies needs. His main stuff is all the longer distance away from home for a few days at a time, then when he's back, he loves to just pickup extra shifts wherever he can in whichever truck, hence all the weird different places.   Oh, as for getting E10 into all the fuels in Australia... It was very quickly highlighted, that we don't have enough biomass available to use to make E10 sustainably like they require, and it would dramatically cut into our, and the worlds food chain supply...   I vote we all just start running on liquid methane gas... Plenty of that just getting tapped off at tips from underground decay... (Note, this is pure just stupid commenting. I could very easily highlight the reasons its not a good idea especially on scale...)
    • Am I correct in assuming that the R35's are getting the classic skyline haircut off the odometer?  Quick search on carsales, there are 33 08 and 09 GTR's for sale, only 2 of them have more then 100,000km's on them (116,075 and 110,000 respectively).  And somehow there are about 25 for sale with around 60,000kms? Looks like the classic skyline haircut to me =/
×
×
  • Create New...