Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

here is a free mod that you can do to your standard skyline bov which will improve your throttle response..

if it has been posted before, then too bad..

I have found a mod that can be done to the standard skyline bovs to make the car a little more responsive without any side effects.

What you will feel is that the boost will come on quicker and the bov will not release till a little later.

meaning that you won't have that constant re-circulating sound you get with the standard bov.. (this sound is heard more if you have a pod filter..)

here is what you do..

take the standard bov off.

look at the bottom of it..

you will see the piston on the hole, then a small hole next to it.

you will need to find a small screw that will fit the hole.

the screw needs to have a FLAT head so that it doesn't protrude too much above the bov plate.

What I did was found a flat screw which fit in the hole easy, then I wrapped it in that plumbers tape (the white stuff) until it was fat enough that it had to be screwed in.

once in, I used some super glue on top to make sure that it is completely on there..

let it dry, put the bov back on and go for a spin..

You should be able to feel the difference..

no more KW's but I think that it comes on boost a lot quicker and doesn't release so early like a standard one does.

if you have any questions or want help doing it, then let me know.

the pics below are not mine but it shows what I am talking about..

bov.jpg

bov_blocked.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/15439-bov-mod/
Share on other sites

it doesn't get rid of the sound.

it just doesn't circulate the air unless you are like 10 in to the vacuum side of the boost guage..

normally, it will circulate the air at even just above 0..

this is all according to my boost gauge..

plus the spool up of the turbo is much quicker.

You will still hear the swoosh sound between gears and it will still re-circulate the air.. as it should..

but it just makes the car nicer to drive.

as for why the hole is there in the first place?

I'm not sure..

probably so that the bov doesn't have to open to circulate the air at normal cruise speeds/boost levels.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/15439-bov-mod/#findComment-317008
Share on other sites

thanks heaps for that. i am not going to do it, till i get the car started, so i can tell if it makes a difference.

why do nissan put it there, same question i have about why they have the throttle body in the position they do. should be at the front, makes cooler piping waaaaaaaay easier.

should have a front mount too.

thats just my bitch.

but good bov idea.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/15439-bov-mod/#findComment-318136
Share on other sites

i did this mod thiss morning and removed it about 15mins later.

on about 10IN-Hg to 3psi you get the air reversion flutter noise

but once on boost and you change gears of snap the throttle closed you get a combined flutter and half ass 'psssht' bov noise. Made the car sound like something was wrong with it. I dont know if it was just my bov but it didnt sound too good.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/15439-bov-mod/#findComment-318753
Share on other sites

haha yep followed them .. pretty easy to do...

the screw was in there tightly, with plumbers tape wrapped around... i had to force the thing in, so it was very tight and secure.

it had a nice flutter on low spool, but once i stomped it abit and let off it had a flutter mixed with the pssht at the same time... kinda sounded like the bov was dying :P

and i do have a r32 rb20det, so its not a NICS engine problem :(

maybe the vale has a weak spring in it... i dunno i just took the screw out

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/15439-bov-mod/#findComment-318768
Share on other sites

lol well I ****ed mine completely. I put the screw there, it was fine. then it sounded monged. Got scared and tried tightening more in case it was the air escaping. Then the F*#KING bolt snapped :D

Had to take the whole pipe off to remove it. But I don't have another bolt. At least I might as well polish the pipe now.

I also lost the bit that goes in between the bov and the pipe the spacer tightening thing. It fell down into the engine, but it was night time and I cbf looking for it. Is this necessary? Does it matter if I need it?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/15439-bov-mod/#findComment-319677
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 year later...

If you have an AUTO - DON'T screw around with this BPV - BY PASS Valve!

If you have a MANUAL - DON'T screw around with this BOV - Blow Off Valve.

If you dont realise the difference, dont screw around!

But consider instead of letting your boost reference for the wastegate be from the snail of the inducer where it comes from as standard, plumb it in to your intake manifold so your waste gate opens a bit later when the boost is actually at the intake of the engine. Caution, this could over speed your turbo:-)

Obviously you block the orig. hose from the snail to stop airleak.

You could also hook the hose from the BPV/BOV to the Intake manifold direct as well for better response.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/15439-bov-mod/#findComment-938152
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...