Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

185RWKW, HUGE torque hole between 4500 - 6000RPM (Power drops to like 100RWKW) and I can still spin 1st and second just by taking off in 1st, punching it around 20-30KM/H and just hang on as it squirms around... Chirp into 3rd occasionally when REALLY punishing it...

Once my torque hole is fixed (Computer is pulling timing atm as someone has modified it with a touch too much timing) should be looking at a very nice and beefy 195-200RWKW...

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i got a series 2 33 with only cat back exhaust, front mount and filter running around 10 psi with 235 tyres on back and if from a rolling start i floor it i get wheel chirp all through first and a decent snap and wheel spin as i throw to 2nd. ive done this with a few diferent brands of tyres?

I have a S2 96 33 which is stock except turbo back, 169kw and lights up if i push hard to 2nd with my 275 hankooks. when i have slicks at the drags i chirp through 3rd and sometimes 4th flat changing. so i dont know why urs isnt at least chirping 2nd

It might be your bleed valve, does it hold boost all the way until you snap 2nd or does it drop off. After putting my bleed valve on I notice that snapping second I wasn't really getting the chirp that’s with 245 nans as well, as there was a little delay with the boost coming it after changing. Try removing the bleed valve

it really sucks, i feel like my car is losing more and more power by the day

maybe im just getting used it to it but i know it definately doesnt wheelspin in 2nd. if i remove bleed valve i will be back at standard boost

i may try it but yeah... what else can i do?

i dont think a dyno will help me as it tells me maximum power in a gear not changing

maybe i should ask to see the torque?

i got a series 2 33 with only cat back exhaust, front mount and filter running around 10 psi with 235 tyres on back and if from a rolling start i floor it i get wheel chirp all through first and a decent snap and wheel spin as i throw to 2nd. ive done this with a few diferent brands of tyres?

mine sounds very simular. 202rwkw and i use 255's and does the same thing.

mate, get a dyno reading, to look at your a/f ratio, may be runnin mega rich and boggin itself down...dont stress mate, youll be poppin seconds for the ladies in no time. maybe your car is just plain shit...i dont know, what am i? a doctor?

  • 2 weeks later...

I have r33 gtst s2 *** AUTO SEDAN *** and I chirp into 2nd.

All I have is 3" Exhaust, HKS pod & 9psi, on a set of 16 inch 225's.

Stock ecu, stock turbo, don't even have a shift kit

No idea about my rwkw's.

When i reset my ecu it gets even better :P

Edited by R_B_Boy

i ran at wsid on wed night, got 14.7 best time... its not too bad i guess

sound about right for turbo back exhaust, 10psi, fcd, pod, standard cooler /turbo/inj and 17" r34 rims

and surprise surprise i didnt get any wheelspin off take off at 5000rpm LOL

bizarre

its not crap... but not good either lol... i dont know how i can check it to make sure that its running well like if i go to put it on the dyno that just check like the peak power doesnt it? coz its only in one gear

is it possible to do a run on a dyno while you change gears to see if anything abnormal is happening??

Did you ever consider your clutch may be slipping a bit?

If you arent getting wheelspin from a 5k take off then maybe the clutch cant hold the sudden dump of power

Coz my clutch is kinda worn n i hardly get any wheelspin

my clutch is awesome its very grabby so to speak. and the revs dont go up like a typical slipping clutch would when giving it

i think it was the rubber on the floor from all the burnouts

dont get me wrong, i didnt just flick my foot off the clutch at 5k i semi-slowly let it out but when i do it on normal road it sits on the spot so it was weird.. first attempt i took off at 4k and no spin so i done it at 5k second go

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...