Jump to content
SAU Community

Suspension Workshop/info Night At Heasmans - Bilstein In Sydney


Recommended Posts

they wont be looking at peoples cars to give specific advice. it's just a general info session. so yeah it doesn't matter if you come by skyline, swift, scooter or skateboard.

ok nice no problems then, hopefully get some info on whats needed for better drifto!

  • Replies 154
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

ok nice no problems then, hopefully get some info on whats needed for better drifto!

Your hooked on drift.I know you are.When are you going back out next.I want to do one next month if possible after autosalon.Then i think my clutch may be shagged and will need replacing.

BTW i will see yall there tomorrow.

Well I hope all those that came had a good time. I'm glad I took 45 peoples names as we only had about 25 rock up which was a good number.

A massive thanks to the guys at Heasmans. What a great bunch of people to put on a bbq, beers, soft drinks, free hats and calendars and of course lots and lots of invaluable info. I thought I was pretty clued up, but I learnt heaps both from Paul, Doug, and all the guys in fact.

So a big thanks again to all the guys at Heasmans for having us at the shop and showing us some great hospitality.

that's ok, it was shithouse weather, and crazy traffic so I did expect a few drop outs. hence the overbooking. hell, it took me an hour and 20 min to get there in what is usually a 30 min drive!

Well done and a big thank you to the Baron of Beer for hooking this up.

Great people at Heasmans, all the staff were helpful and informative, great hosts.

And all the SAU people, always great to catch-up with you guys.

Oh and "free Hat, free Hat, free Hat, free Hat" :closedeyes:

We had a great night :rolleyes:

Got great information and now I have a better understanding on what goes on with a shock :O

Thanks to Heasman and putting on a excellent night

Thanks Baron for organising a great night :unsure:

Jess

Cheers for organising the info night barron.You were the person with the ARC jacket yeah?

no worries at all. yep, I was the dashing young man in the ARC jacket. lol.




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You won't need to do that if your happy to learn to tune it yourself. You 100% do not need to do that. It is not part of the learning process. It's not like driving on track and 'finding the limit by stepping over the limit'. You should not ever accidently blow up an engine and you should have setup the ECU's engine protection to save you from yourself while you are learning anyway. Plenty of us have tuned their own cars, myself included. We still come here for advice/guidance/new ideas etc.  What have you been doing so far to learn how to tune?
    • Put the ECU's MAP line in your mouth. Blow as hard as you can. You should be able to see about 10 kPa, maybe 15 kPa positive pressure. Suck on it. You should be able to generate a decent vacuum to about the same level also. Note that this is only ~2 psi either way. If the MAP is reading -5 psi all the time, ignition on, engine running or not, driving around or not, then it is severely f**ked. Also, you SHOULD NOT BE DRIVING IT WITHOUT A LOAD REFERENCE. You will break the engine. Badly.
    • Could be correct. Meter might be that far out. Compare against a known 5 ohm 1% resistor.
    • @Murray_Calavera  If I were an expert I wouldn't be in here looking for assistance.  I am extremely computer literate, have above average understanding on how things should be working and how they should tie together.  If I need to go to a professional tuner so be it, but I'd much rather learn and do things myself even if it means looking for some guidance along the way and blowing up a few engines. @GTSBoy  I was hoping it would be as simple as a large vacuum leak somewhere but I'm unable to find anything, all lines seem to be well capped or going where they need to be, and when removed there is vacuum felt on the tube.  It would be odd for the Haltech built in MAP to be faulty, the GTT tune I imported had it enabled from the start, I incorrectly assumed it was reading a signal from the stock MAP, but that doesn't exist.  After running a vacuum hose to the ECU the signal doesn't change more than 0.2 in either direction.   I'll probably upload a video of my settings tomorrow, as it stands I'm able to daily drive, but getting stuttering when giving it gas from idle, so pulling away from lights is a slow process of revving it up and feathering the clutch until its moving, then it will accelerate fine.  It sounds like I need to get to the bottom of the manifold pressure issue, but the ignition timing section is most intimidating to me and will probably let a pro do that part.  Tomorrow I'll try a different vacuum line to T off of, with any luck I selected one that was already bypassed during the DBW swap.  (edit: I went out and did it right now, the line I had chosen did appear to have no vacuum on it, it used to go to the front of the intake, I've now completely blocked that one off at the bracket that holds several vacuum lines by the firewall.  I T'd into the vacuum line that goes from that bracket to the vacuum pump at the front of the car, but no change in the MAP readings).  Using the new vacuum line that has obvious vacuum on the hose, im still only getting readings between -6.0 and -5.2.  I'm wondering why the ECU was detecting -5.3 when nothing was connected to the MAP nipple and ECU MAP selected as the source. @feartherb26  I do have +T in the works but wanted to wait until Spring to start with that swap since this is my good winter AWD vehicle.  When removing the butterfly, did it leave a bunch of holes in the manifold that you needed to plug?  I thought about removing it but assumed it would be a mess.   I notice no difference when capping the vacuum line to it or letting it do its thing.  This whole thing has convinced me to just get a forward facing manifold when the time comes though.
    • Update: tested my spark plugs that are supposed to be 5ohms with a 10% deviation and one gave me a 0 ohms reading and the rest were 3.9ohm<, so one bad and the others on their way out.
×
×
  • Create New...