Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I recently purchased a set of Ferrea valves part # F1934P and F1936P to suit RB25DET 1mm oversize. Only problem is...they are wrong.

I rang Ferrea and told them their valves are wrong and they asked me if maybe I had made an error but I informed them that this was not possible. They thanked me for bringing this terrible mistake to their attention and I promptly sent sample valves to them in Florida for inspection.

Wondering if anyone else has purchased these valves from Ferrea and if they were the correct valve or not?

The issue is the stem length which is around 15 - 20mm longer on both intake and exhaust.

No uninformed suggestions please...just if you have bought or used these valves. Or if you have used other brands of oversize valves for RB25DET only.

Cheers, Daniel.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/156681-ferrea-valves/
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Turns out I was right. It was Performance Wholesales mistake all along. Ferrea confirmed that the valves were to suit 1999-2002 RB25DET.

I have sent them a sample head with valves so that they can start producing early RB25 valves, springs and other head components. I have also sent them RB20DET cylinder head complete so that they can start making parts for them also.

They will be the only company that I know of to do a direct bolt in valve replacement for RB25DET or RB20DET so stay tuned for the results of that.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/156681-ferrea-valves/#findComment-3016933
Share on other sites

Turns out I was right. It was Performance Wholesales mistake all along. Ferrea confirmed that the valves were to suit 1999-2002 RB25DET.

I have sent them a sample head with valves so that they can start producing early RB25 valves, springs and other head components. I have also sent them RB20DET cylinder head complete so that they can start making parts for them also.

They will be the only company that I know of to do a direct bolt in valve replacement for RB25DET or RB20DET so stay tuned for the results of that.

WHY NOW MAN, i want some schiznit for my 20 head

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/156681-ferrea-valves/#findComment-3016942
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

HAHAHA When they told you that they were unaware of the issue, they were full of $hit. I and another guy were having ours cut to the proper length for a S1/S2 RB25DET two weeks before you talked to them because they only had NEO sized valves for the solid lifters. I talked to Zeke for about 20 minutes and told him that there's a larger US market for non-NEO RB25's than NEO, but he didn't seem to believe me.

I'm having issues with my installed valve height now too and it is either because the valves were not machined to factory specs or my valve job was a little too aggressive.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/156681-ferrea-valves/#findComment-3062060
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...