Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

N1's are laggy as, we have them on our Targa car. My car has HKS GT2530's (same as 2860 -5 i think), and i'm on 1.1 bar @ 4400rpm, the N1's are on 1.1 bar at over 5000rpm.

I'd go the Garrett's if you can afford it.

Depends on how much HP you want to run and what sort of response you want. I've got the 2860-5 and they come on at around 4K and make 430RWHP without cams. You sacrifice a little response but I think they're worth it. PNBlight makes about 520RWHP on his 33R, but I would'nt expect to get alot more. From memory Garrett advertise them as a "replacement upgrade "for the 34 GT-R turbos (-7). N1 and 2860R-5 really are quite different turbos and therefore not really comparable. You'd be better off comparing HKS2530, 2860R-5 and Trust T517. There was a good thread that contained a side by side comparison just recently... the HKS 2530 and the Trust T517 have more legs and produce more HP at higher rpm respectively. That would make the 2860r-5 a good comprimise for price and reposnse.

I dont want to run more than 1.2 bar as its on stock internals ( last engine died on .85 bar bloody stock turbos ) and big horse power is not the objective just want a good solid performance.

N1's are laggy as, we have them on our Targa car. My car has HKS GT2530's (same as 2860 -5 i think), and i'm on 1.1 bar @ 4400rpm, the N1's are on 1.1 bar at over 5000rpm.

I'd go the Garrett's if you can afford it.

depends on the N1s though. there are heaps of different types. even in R34 N1s there are two different types. one has 0.48 comp and 0.64 turbine the other has 0.60 comp and 0.64 turbine, both ball bearing, but the 0.48 is very responsive. much more than GT2530s. the 0.60 would be less responsive, but should make a little more up top. If you are talking R32 N1s (aka Group A's) they are laggier still but have pretty decent power potential.

depends on the N1s though. there are heaps of different types. even in R34 N1s there are two different types. one has 0.48 comp and 0.64 turbine the other has 0.60 comp and 0.64 turbine, both ball bearing, but the 0.48 is very responsive. much more than GT2530s. the 0.60 would be less responsive, but should make a little more up top. If you are talking R32 N1s (aka Group A's) they are laggier still but have pretty decent power potential.

Since he said Nismo N1's I was guessing R32/R33 N1's.

As i dont want to run a big top end the smaller N1 would be more suitable. they are from a R34 and have a A/R of .48

Still the cost of rebuilding N1 turbos is almost the same a new Garrets

i went down this path 2 weeks ago.

brand new from garret they are around 1200, a new cartridge + rebuild was about 700 and i ended up going for 5mm oversize as new cartridge for 34n1's was about 1-2 weeks wait

Edited by Angus Smart

Yer not that easy over here, i guess i could find some one to rebuild them but no part available so would have to order them and wait. Think the new garrets maybe the more effective solution in this case

Cheers all

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi GTSBoy, Excuse my ignorance but what does a "Bad" Knee point mean ? 
    • HFM BM57 has a "bad" knee point, IIRC. It's not the same thing as the later R chassis MC.
    • The ATTESSA is functionally identical to R34; there were a bunch of JDM models that continued ATTESSA including Fuga/Q70, Skyline/Q50, Cima etc as an option. All with Auto only and I think mostly for snow regions. AFAIK there were no AWD VR30DDTT sold in Australia - it is on my to do list to check regs for racing a LHD car in Targa/ATR/AASA/CAMS events because if I can get the auto to work it would be interesting to run a 4wd car The Ecuteck TCM tuning is the same model as their ECU tuning, they already have it for R35 and Dose's favourite, BMW. You buy "points" to allow your computer to be tuned, buy either a bluetooth (phone app) or bluetooth+USB+Key (phone and PC) dongle, and pay for a tune that will be locked to your tuner ( ). You can also access the tuning software yourself but 1. it is mega expensive and 2. these computers have a billion parameters that intersect, so how could you ever spend enough time on it to get a decent result.
    • Or, is it a case of what it is like owning an R series Skyline? NFI what the previous owner has done or fiddled with... Ha ha ha After reading through this thread, I went on a bit of a research about the Q50/Q60. Now I'm quite intrigued by them! Is the AWD in them more like a WRX where it's always AWD, or is it more like the ATTESSA in the GTRs? By the sound of this TCU tuning, this sounds like a case of someone has made some real software for it, and you just need the right piece of hardware, and then you license that specific vehicle/TCU. Or is this a case of the software will be really expensive so only a few tuners have it, and you still have to pay a license per vehicle?
    • By popular demand.. it was a coil. Got my hands on 1 new OEM coil, replaced with the one that made the less noise difference when I unplugged it while the car was running and started the car up. No stutter and the engine light was gone. I guess I’ll buy the other 5 they have lol
×
×
  • Create New...