Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Let me start be saying that, i am not posting this thread just to promote the Wolf 3D as the best ecu blah blah.....( As i beleive similar power gains can be acheived using any PROVEN programmable ecu) My intention for this topic is to demonstrate to people, especially the youger performance car drivers, the advantages and power gains to be had by installing a programmable ecu. I feel that too many 'newbies' think that a BIG turbo with a factory ecu is the best way to go. Unfortunately this belief is not only wrong, but can lead to a blown motor and turbo. I have seen this done, motor blew and fired peices of metal into a new turbo.

True power gains can be accomplished safely b4 you even touch the turbo.

I decided to attach a picture of a dyno sheet of my car. This was done a few weeks ago and I wasn’t going to post it as the power rating/figure doesn’t mean squat. I am just showing you a comparison between the wolf 3d ecu and the factory ecu.

Back round info:

This was done, as I wasn’t happy with my dyno result on the Dr_Drift Dyno day.

My mechanic is in the process of purchasing a dyno, so the rep. from dyno dynamics brought the dyno to the w/shop to demonstrate all its operations. (Lucky for me, my car was the test car :D)

Now the rep did all the setting up and driving, whilst my mechanic was in the passenger seat, I was on the sidelines. So if the dyno dynamic rep. can’t do an accurate run, who can? (Read: This is a true reading of the car’s power). I also put my factory rims back on, as I knew my 19 “s would produce a lower kW reading (physics)

After doing a few runs with the wolf, we plugged back in the factory ecu to see the difference. A couple of runs were done on the ecu with the same results. I do not know if the ecu needs time to recalibrate itself after being unplugged, but the results were huge. Also, before buying the wolf the car would backfire and loose power while on hi-boost (this occured due to the inability of the factory ecu to adapt to my modifications), thus prompting me to get the wolf 3d.

*All runs were done without the huge fan at the front of the car, as there was no room on the dyno dynamics trailer to fit it. Thus, intake temps. would have been higher than normal.

Mods: (these are listed in order)

- 3” exhaust, turbo back

- pod

- 13psi (via bleed valve)

- Fmic

- Sealed off pod and placed a cold feed to pod using a 4" drain pipe from front bar. (I now recommend only to install a pod once the fmic is installed thus allowing you to do this mod.)

- H/D clutch

The graph indicates that more gains could be had with some fine tunning. As one could see betwwen 2500rpm and 5000rpm the a/f ratio is very rich, and the power curve has a slight 'ditch'. Also the car acheives its peak power at 6100rpm, which is lower than usual (6800rpm), this could be due to the fact that boost tappers off and is not flat. By 6100rpm boost drops to approx. 11.5psi. I am planning to install a Wolf boost controller and completing the std. BOV mod. to keep boost at 13psi flat.

PS: The “MAX 140.0 kW” was for the factory ecu, the wolf 3d made 189.7 kW (NOT in ‘shoot out’ mode)

PSS: Sorry for the long post, but i think it could be helpful to some :D.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/15735-programmable-ecu-vs-factory-ecu/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Well done Al, with the mods you have done, the next most logical step was to do the ECU. Too many people go too far with mods before they attack the ECU.

We could have long discusion about the merits of AFM versus MAP driven ECU's, but as you point out that's not the point.

Thanks for posting.

Nice gain. I'm already at 245hp (182kw) @ rear wheels on a dyno dynamics (non shootout mode) with the stock ecu still and thats my next planned mod to change to an aftermarket ecu and nismo fuel reg to keep the pressure up, hopefully I can get close to 200rwkw's with the change. So far it looks like an autronics for me at around $3500 installed. I've looked at the haltech ($2500 installed) and the power fc but most people I have spoken with say the autronics will be the better way to go.

Do lots of research. Compare the features and pricing of each ECU. Be aware of the tuning cost associated with each ECU.

I have the Wolf plug'n'play and am very happy with it, but there are lots of good ecu's to choose from now:D

See'ya:burnout:

EnricoPalazzo:

Basically nothing (part of tunning), as the unit plugs into your factory loom. The only additional thing was a vaccum pipe from the plenum to the ecu, inside the cabin. It also had a base program so the car was drivable without the tune. Personally i wouldn't drive long without tunning it properly as all engines have different characteristics.

Tuner is very important. Here in Adelaide, I have tried to investigate the functionallity of the 3DV4.51??? NO ONE has a bloody clue about the ECU with regards to an R33. I even rang a distributor, and he couldnt tell me squat just that it was a plug and play. He also told me that it only had basic ECU functionality such as fuel and timing - no sequential idle, couldnt tell me if it batch fired or not, just had no idea. Even on the wolf website, I could find no mention of the plug and play or even the wolf 3DV4.5.

So do make sure your tuner is comfortable and competant with the ecu before you buy it or you could be throwing money away.

Paul, I sent him a pm, he basically told me to have a look on the website and see my local distributor. Mentioned a few of the functions, but I need detail. Eg the website says wolf V4 only has 4 ign drivers - ie batch fire? The tuning shops I have spoken to over hear have said to steer clear

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...