Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys now i just brought a series 1 r33 gtst from o,neill car yard in southport QLD and its a an auto and stock beside from the catback high flow and 600x300 front mount . and its nearly 30Littres of fuel every 200ks even on long trip and not giving it boost . boost is stock . just been dyno by who ever the dealership took it to then it was running so good after that but still running rich .. is this normal for S1 R33 gtst to go through 30L every 20ks on long trip. cheers, adam :D

what would be the problem to solve this..

Edited by adamR33
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/158035-rich-fuel/
Share on other sites

i had a 33 gtst auto and it use to be quite thirsty on the juice. Does it have a atmo BOV? I think it may play apart in it especially the BOV. i use to get about 300 ks to a tank which is not to good at all. Mite have to look at getting a safc to controll the fuel mixtures? feel free to correct me if im wrong? :D

Edited by 95SKY
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/158035-rich-fuel/#findComment-2934045
Share on other sites

i had a 33 gtst auto and it use to be quite thirsty on the juice. Does it have a atmo BOV? or Exhaust etc? I think they may play apart in it especially the BOV. i use to get about 300 ks to a tank which is not to good at all. Mite have to look at getting a safc to controll the fuel mixtures? feel free to correct me if im wrong? :D

hey thanks well the BOV is factory but notice it has the excact same mitshi 4g63t stock bov as i used to have a cc coupe with a 4g63t vr4 in it. 3inch stainless catback exhause. and whats a safc controle cheers.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/158035-rich-fuel/#findComment-2934079
Share on other sites

change your plugs first, clean your injectors and then replace your 02 sensor. If still not happy then get a SAFC to lean it out a bit

all true

check voltages on 02 sensor... search you wil find...

plugs... etc

injecotr cleaner and a few tanks... general maintanence wouldnt hurt.

for me i had the same issue but once i changed my smic to fmic a great deal of problems went away for me... but admitedly do ALL the rest first then try this... another idea is check weather you really o have stock management in your car...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/158035-rich-fuel/#findComment-2937791
Share on other sites

ok check my ecu , its all stock O2 senser is brand new as the car has only done 68,000ks but i know the o2 senser no where near that , should i close the gap to 0.8 and how much better will this safc do to the fuel saving well what would be to average be as mine is about 17L per 100ks..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/158035-rich-fuel/#findComment-2938269
Share on other sites

yes i have the same problem. how do you clean your injectors, just with some additives.

You can have them cleaned from injector cleaner (but make sure the additive is suitable for turbo charged engines) but realy your best of getting them professionaly done.

Edited by 95SKY
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/158035-rich-fuel/#findComment-2938976
Share on other sites

The general consensus from pretty much all fuel based threads is -

Injector cleaner - Cleans injectors, cheap fix

Decent fuel - explanatory

Reset ECU - prevents the car from running on knock maps from crap fuel

Clogged cat - creates restriction, car runs crap

Vacuum leak - causes car to run crap

Spark plugs - wrong rating can cause crap economy

Oxygen sensor - if dead causes crap economy

Injector stuck open/faulty - causes excess fuel to be dumped

I might have missed a few, but just keep going down the list till it fixes the problem

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/158035-rich-fuel/#findComment-2939373
Share on other sites

ok i think i figered something can someone tell me if these are the right plugs as this is the one i had in it from the car yard its NGK..R...BCPR6ES... cheers...adam

p.s its an r33 rb25det S1

post-35464-1172636289.jpg

Edited by adamR33
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/158035-rich-fuel/#findComment-2941344
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...