Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm just wanting to get some of peoples thoughts on here. What would people rather be driving a r32 93 m-spec or a 92 m spec? What if the 92 was in better condition than the 93? Would you just buy the 93 because you can say its the latest r32 you can buy? The good thing is the lights are updated from the 89-91 so there like a newer version of the 32. Or would you not care about the year of the car?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/158753-different-years-of-r32/
Share on other sites

this has been done to death. have a search. also, this is hardly forced induction.

I say condition matters. Age also matters. if a car is 89 v 93, at 4 years old, unless if it's parked in a bubble, it will be exposed to the environment for longer so it'll ahve more rust etc.

they didnt have door bar thingies... u know.. those things.

Reinforcements which come in handy during a possible side impact...

I guess if you look at what what car I have there are no points for which one I would take..

But in all seriousness, I prefer the second generation of the R32.. if it is a 92 or 93 is of no real difference, except u can say it was the last year that car was made if u had the 93...

type m*

:happy:

You're wasting your time bacons, multiple people have tried telling Nth time and time again that there's no such thing, and that it's actually "type m", but if the information hasn't been absorbed yet..

.....I give you points for trying though :laugh:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Did you pay with a credit card? I'd be putting a charge back through then finding a new sparky to sort it out. 
    • If you mean the alarm immobiliser; theyre internal to the alarm itself which makes that difficult; I couldnt even see where he put it; its not in the same place as last time; but with all black wiring it might be very challenging to trace  I had someone turn the key for me as I know it only primes for a couple of seconds As my post above; I am getting no voltage to the pump at all; but I am testing continuity of the power line (SB) from the pump plug to the relay fine. As well as the negative from the pump plug to a 12V constant.    Yeah; he blammed the no start on a bad battery; said I needed to get a new battery and it'll start. Turns out the battery drained because the tail lights had been on for half the day during the install (the rubber cushion on the brake switch gave out while he was testing it as I have a picture of the car from that morning with the tail lights off..i've replaced that). The battery was turning over the engine just fine for a long time; but got low since lights were draining it so it was too low to test a start after he finished. I bought a new one on his advice...$250 wasted. My original battery charged up just fine and is healthy.    It was running perfectly fine when I messed up the old alarm (programmed out the remotes). He couldnt start it after removing the old alarm; my assumption is that when he unhooked it; he didnt bridge the circuit back when trying to start it. Its always been perfectly fine. The ECU swap and pump were 2 years ago. It's never missed a beat in that time. 
    • This is a big issue for me without the diff. I just have zero drive from the passenger side when drivers side has no traction. Bec's parents place has a crazy steep driveway with odd camber and I have never been able to get up. My bro-in-law's 130i with an (unknown brand) LSD gets up fine as does their dad's Hiace. My car stays at the bottom. We have other odd camber roads around here as we're elevated a bit and if it's raining I can get totally stuck around some hairpins. 
    • Yeah, I am super excited for this.
    • Was the car running before he touched the car?
×
×
  • Create New...