Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

AS the topic states.

Anyone who did a comp test on their stock R33 before they modded it post it up.

I did mine recently before I threw on some mods. all mine had was the HKS from the turbo back with SuperDragger Exhaust. running stock boost etc. etc.

I got 175-175-175-175-175-175 all pots , I was definently pleased with that they were nice and even.

When I was chatting with a GTR owner recently he seemed to think that was incorrect. Or that my internals are not stock for that compression test.

So went back to my mates shop did another same result. Now he uses top quality snap-on equipment so I'm sure all the readings are correct.

Just wanted to do a Comparison to anyone elses results.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/159442-compression-test-results/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Mine got 175 with the throttle wide open, 160 with throttle closed r32GTR

8.5:1 compression RB26DETT

9.2:1 or something on RB25DET

So either you did test with throttle closed or you have a lower static comp ratio?

who are you talking about. ME. i did it with throttle closed i think. Humm will do again tonight. But the range is 1.2 MPa which is 175pis, that is NEW from facotry. Limmit is 0.9 MPa, so that is 130 Psi with 0.1 MPa differance between. So still sweet. My engine has done 80K so expect lower compresion.

BTW mine is for an R33 GTST 95 series

Thanks for the heads up GTRsean. Not sure if it was open or closed. all i know was car was off :ninja:

ill be doin another very soon, keen to check out if theres been any change since ive been driving around on 11psi for 2 months.

-cheers.

Videospace, were they done with throttle open?

And did oil get put in cyl to see if it was piston, rings etc?

32gtr rb26dett limits from memory are:

171 new

160 avg

125 limit

no more than 14psi variance,(146,160)

Yep. Idle is crap. When it is cold it misses a lot. When it is warm its very hard to tell there is anything wrong. The idle is still not brilliant when it is warm but otherwise the power is OK and everything else.

Bryce

And yes the 6th cylinder was 150 too (sorry guys).

And yes we did try a "wet test" with a t-spoon of oil and the compression improved. Rings it is. Rebuild away! I am considering a swap with a R33 RB26.

so this test is around $70 and most car garages can do it? or do you need to go to a special place? Keen to see how my engine is doing. Might do one of those leak down tests too, someone mentioned above.

oh well vidospace, now you can build whatever engine you want.

N1 block ftw!! :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...