Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

but i do want to make a minimum of 230 rwk.. so yea im just weighing up the options

figures mean nothing... its wether you are pleased with your vehicle...

my car "supposedly" made 214.9rwkw... now i know its a little high for the mods i had but hey it felt quicker and thats all i gave a shit about...

the mindset you need is that you just need to be pleased with the driveability of the vehicle... you do supporting mods so that way your motor will cope and you get the most out of your driving experience with your car.. take it for a run down 1/4 and after you get it tuned and see how it feels...

guaranteed with highflow pfc inj n your current mods with ebc holding boost even at 1 bar you'll freak..

my 2 c :D

I had another version of a GT30r, and it made 240rwkw. I was able to run 12's with that. You're going to need Semi Slicks though.

With 240rwkw, a 1.6 launch, and decent driving, you'll run the low to mid 12's.

Edited by The Mafia
also remember guys boost is reletive to the compressor

so 15psi on a stock turbo and 15psi on a gt35r are not the same thing

thats very true and i've witnessed 1st hand... i was running 12psi on standard turbo and now i have a gt2876R on 6psi (ran out of money so i'm granny driving :D) and its just throwing soo much air in even on that much psi its thrown off the afr's real bad... but 12psi with my new turbo it will fly compared to standard :D

yea he should give it a go... he has the hardware to do it.. let us know how much you make :)

most definately will mate. gonna drive it stock til i get the fuel pump and injectors though so it wont be for another 4-6 weeks.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...