Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

.....Who's car can run 10's flat...and do they use it everyday?

Brother inlaw ran 10.21 @137mph RX7 S3 13BT untubbed street driven. :)

Previous to our skylines we had RX2 12A bridge and it was the most fun I have ever had driving that thing,

hubby used to complain I had no mechanical sympathy, but it kept going and going.

too many variables with drag cars.

if u look at the pro rwd category in sport compact racing worldwide, pistons r the clear leader with titan running 6.41@220 in their 2J scion, theyre just making too much power for any rotary engine to catch.

at the end of the day, nothing beats v8 twin turbo :) no1s yet to catch MRMAD in australia :) and thats only a 3/4 chassis car!

yeah sports compact cars can only go as fast as to a certain degree.....

You'd probably find that the quickest cars come out of Puerto Rico.

Here's a video of a quick RX8, did a 6.81 @ 200mph in August 2005, and that still wasn't the quickest car at the time. http://videos.streetfire.net/Player.aspx?f...p;kw=11&p=0

Brother inlaw ran 10.21 @137mph RX7 S3 13BT untubbed street driven. :)

Previous to our skylines we had RX2 12A bridge and it was the most fun I have ever had driving that thing,

hubby used to complain I had no mechanical sympathy, but it kept going and going.

Now thats what I am talking about :sorcerer:

A real car driven on the street...not a car that can't turn a corner :sleep:

RX7's have one of the best chassis for drag racing...this is why they are stripped down and re-built .

  • 2 months later...
Fuel consumption however is high

This is true on stock models but as the power goes up, the gas mileage doesn't go down much. In comparison to a piston motored car anyways.

im not quite sure why everyone keeps saying they're so unreliable...there are 2 guys at my works with a rx3 and rx4 and both claim its been about 160000ks without a rebuild now

I owned a 1987 RX-7 Turbo II with a few small modifications. I got 190,000miles on the odometer before the engine seals blew due to the radiator dying. One of my buddies owned a NA version of the same car and hit well over 250,000miles before the car rusted apart (lots of snow here, and they salt the roads). The normal problem with reliability is that the seals which hold the housings together go bad, which causes coolant to get into the engine. Coolant, being mostly water doesn't compress or combust, which kinda ruins your engines day. Rotary engines self lubricate when they run (they actually burn nearly 1 quart of oil every 3000miles), but most people just have the cars as weekend rides and they almost always sit in the winter. Sitting for extended periods of time causes the seals dry up and thats where the reliability issues come in. You rarely hear to many problems coming from daily driven RX cars.

Does anyone know what time the quickest rotor in the world does down a quater mile ? and what makes them so good compared to piston motors ?

I don't know what the fastest rotor is, but the reason they are so good is that they basically only have 2 moving parts (the rotors themselves). Because of this, there is a lot less to break. They are also way more efficient because they do intake, compression, combustion and exhaust all in the same chamber. Also rotary engines are VERY lightweight and they take very well to modification (big honkin turbos and whatnot).

No doubt in my mind that the Wankel motor would be superior to its piston competitors if people had spent the same amount of time developing it over the last 100+ years as they did the internal combustion piston motors. Heres some more information for anyone who actually cares. http://auto.howstuffworks.com/rotary-engine.htm

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Just bought a 2002 Stagea 250tRS VR-X Four AERO VQ25DET and spent the last two weekends cleaning and detailing it.. still have to do the wheels and the engine bay but the rest of it came up nice. Imported 2011 to S.A. and I'm the third owner since it was imported. I met the guy who brought it over, he went to Japan and picked out the car, bought it and ordered the wheels. He also gave me a list of stuff he did to the car with receipts. Coil overs (I have the original springs), 3" exhaust from the dump pipe back no cat, Custom dump pipe,(I have the original exhaust), Plenum spacer, 18" custom Work XSA wheels (need restoring, I've made a start..), Shift kit put through the 5 speed tiptronic auto, TV and menus/screens changed to english, Australian DTV tuner installed in rear. I've just had four new discs and new pads as well as all the fluids including the brake fluid replaced. I have all the receipts for the last 15 years and the import papers in a nice folder. Car looks great, goes like hell but fuel economy is not a thing lol.. pics next..
    • I ended up in this rut again lol, and used a shit ton of filler. One thing I can't understand is, even after using a big long block and going in long X pattern strokes, I always end up at bare metal again with no filler, and my repair started at one end of the door and now I've chased my tail to almost the other end of the door. I was thinking of hitting the panel with a hammer where it might be a high spot and making everything low then filling it, I did this on a small section on my other door by mistake and I think I fixed it lol. Is this a bad idea? The other thing is with guidecoat, whether it's the powder or spray, after I sand all the guide coat off, it doesn't reveal anything for me in terms of high spots and low spots and makes it especially hard when it's bare metal (at least in powdered form), am I doing something wrong here, or likely a high spot I keep going over and creating valleys? Lastly, stupid question but, is it possible that after sanding if I only sand over the filler area where I know to be a dent that it's impossible for me to dig into that dent? Unless there are other problems which I missed.  
    • Yeah the rule of thumb with an LS is 7psi per 1000rpm. That is decidedly not enough at 6800rpm. I mainly looked for the scenarios where knock started to be picked up and it was later in the session when things were hotter, and oil was thinner, and the pressure was lower than it should be. (i.e very horrible). I am hoping with thicker oil (I was running Penrite ten tenths 10-40, the manual specifies 10-30) that does not leak that it's much improved at that time!!! I am using Project Mu Club Racer CR pads. I'm also using the Project Mu 335C fluid. The symptoms imply that it was fluid that boiled, but no bubbles seemed pretty weird to me when I bled it today. I want to try Castrol SRF as it has a much higher wet temp but, well, I have new Project Mu fluid lol... so I should at least use that. The pedal on track was really noticable. It went from basically normal feeling to instantly near-floor. The car did pull up as before, it was just very much nearly at the floor before the brakes engaged. At that point I pretty much decided the day was very done, it did *kinda* come back during that very slow cooldown lap into the pits. Felt perfectly fine driving home.
    • f**king around with the bro
×
×
  • Create New...