Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

well i dunno, maybe the guy doin it isnt completely up to date or whatever, but we havent specifically organised a dodgy one. does anyone in this thread do roadworthies by any chance? maybe we could clear up some details. what is it baout pods exactly thats illeagle? i always thought if they were boxed it was ok, like that ARC one? provifing its a dry element filter etc...

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

well i dunno, maybe the guy doin it isnt completely up to date or whatever, but we havent specifically organised a dodgy one. does anyone in this thread do roadworthies by any chance? maybe we could clear up some details. what is it baout pods exactly thats illeagle? i always thought if they were boxed it was ok, like that ARC one? provifing its a dry element filter etc...

The problem isn't the pod, but the fact that there is 2 intake mods...i.e a pod is fine (so long as its not an oiled element IIRC), and a front mount on a car that didn't come from the factory with one is fine, but a pod and a fmic isn't...

If you were to put a pod on an Evo 8 for example, it's only 1 intake mod (as they have a front mount standard) and is therefor legal

well i dunno, maybe the guy doin it isnt completely up to date or whatever, but we havent specifically organised a dodgy one. does anyone in this thread do roadworthies by any chance? maybe we could clear up some details. what is it baout pods exactly thats illeagle? i always thought if they were boxed it was ok, like that ARC one? provifing its a dry element filter etc...

Its illegal.

Read the EPA thread, which just so happens to be s sticky thread aswell.

Surprise :sorcerer:

So end of the day, if you do get a RWC, you could be put off the road as soon as you leave VicRoads

andru has organised a roadworthy, a legit one, we've (me and andrew) have asked the guy if a custom airbox will be legit and he told us it would be, as long as its boxed up.

In the end I have found that whats legal and what they will clear are two different things. The fact remains that 2 intake mods are illegal and even if it gets cleared this time, any TMU cop who picks andru up next time will defect him for the exact same thing. In saying that I suggest you try Burwood VicRoads :wave: to get the defect cleared, they are.................sympathetic. Particularly around closing time on a Friday.

Good Luck

ok ok everyone is having a fit because its 'illeagle'. go read the first post, HE WANTS TO GET THE DEFECT CLEARED WHICH IN THIS CASE, A CUSTOM AIRBOX WILL DO.

oh and thanks for the tip abour burwood vic roads, will let andru know...

wow man cry me a river....damnnn....chill out man......dont have to get all serious lol, listen mate all u have been doing is giving me answers to questions i havnt asked, i asked for a air box maker, not about wether its legal or not.....im sorry if ive offended you in any way JVP lol.....

i can read mate, but i can also ignore :wave:

lol

that last comment pretty much sums up whats going on here.

you ignore the information given to you.

Actually no, you said you wanted one to clear a defect. You cant actually clear a defect with one... which is what people are trying to inform you.

But as usual, your more interested in spamming posts and not reading

couldnt have made it any clearer.

Okay. how about i do you a deal then.

I'll just ban you. Then we never have to see another muppet thread of yours again?

lol

that would be good.

lol u guys just wait, im gonna be holding the RWC in my hands, standing next to my car, and pointing to the air box, and we will see if it clears or not. but come on guys can we have some shop names?>????

Jesus titty f**king.

Regardless of anDru being a retarded git pull your f**king heads in. You know it will pass even if it's not technically legal. He actually asked a pretty simple question which only required a simple answer, nothing more. I am so sick of people jumping on their high horse and pointing out useless bullshit when they know for a fact their own cars have umpteen illegal modifications.

Why aren't you all posting up a storm in every thread that mentions illegal modifications? Where's your righteous fury in the cosmetic mods section? The business traders section? Just STFU.

Cutting the back out of the snorkal - modification

Different Intercooler - modification

Different pipes - modification

Redirecting pipes - modification

Non-paper filter - modification

See the problem? Technically any of the popular FMIC kits are not legal and yet SHOCK f**kING HORROR will pass roadworthy.

lol u guys just wait, im gonna be holding the RWC in my hands, standing next to my car, and pointing to the air box, and we will see if it clears or not. but come on guys can we have some shop names?>????

Please do.

Then im gonna send it to the EPA just for shits and giggles.

Different Intercooler - modification

Different pipes - modification

Redirecting pipes - modification

Non-paper filter - modification

See the problem? Technically any of the popular FMIC kits are not legal and yet SHOCK f**kING HORROR will pass roadworthy.

The above are actually legal. Save for an oiled filted which is also clearly listed as unapproved. (only one ive removed was chopping a snorkel)

The only issues listed are the I/C & Pod in combination. The piping is not flagged as an issue, nor is a panel filter so long as its not oil.

So all of whats listed up there is actually 100% legal in the eyes of VicRoads & the EPA, so in actual fact, its not problem at all.

Thats all "technically" speaking of course, seeing as though you wanna get into technicallities.

Make sure you do your homework kiddies :dry:

Please do.

Then im gonna send it to the EPA just for shits and giggles.

damn nismoid, i bet u were the kid at skool who always had a cry when the other kids used to wipe their snot on ur clothes huh? harden the F*ck up hahahhahaha....gotta love dat chopper reed

Jesus titty f**king.

Regardless of anDru being a retarded git pull your f**king heads in. You know it will pass even if it's not technically legal. He actually asked a pretty simple question which only required a simple answer, nothing more. I am so sick of people jumping on their high horse and pointing out useless bullshit when they know for a fact their own cars have umpteen illegal modifications.

the guy talks sense, even though calln me a retarded git?(sp?) but the mans right. and what i was trying to point out this whole time. eveyrone here knows that it will pass, yet everyone has to get all judge judy and shiet and try be a hero.

mate if u run for prime minister, u got my vote :dry:

alot of ownage going on in this thread lol

LOL u got that right......

Edited by anDru
come on,

punch on or race or do something this shits getting boring

voilence and street racing suggestions will not be tolorated and is a breach of forum rules

at least i think thats what nismoid would say.......... :dry:

Please do.

Then im gonna send it to the EPA just for shits and giggles.

The above are actually legal. Save for an oiled filted which is also clearly listed as unapproved. (only one ive removed was chopping a snorkel)

The only issues listed are the I/C & Pod in combination. The piping is not flagged as an issue, nor is a panel filter so long as its not oil.

So all of whats listed up there is actually 100% legal in the eyes of VicRoads & the EPA, so in actual fact, its not problem at all.

Thats all "technically" speaking of course, seeing as though you wanna get into technicallities.

Make sure you do your homework kiddies :dry:

(a) Open element or pod type air cleaners on

carburetted vehicles are not permitted.

(b) Dry element pod type air cleaners are

permitted on EFI vehicles. Oiled, oil-soaked or

fluid-treated elements are not permitted. Any

sensors integral to the original system must

be retrofitted to the same approximate

location.

© Intercoolers that are larger than standard or

have a different mounting location or are

added where none were originally fitted, are

permitted only if no other changes to the

intake system have been made. In other

words, you may have a pod filter or

modified/added intercooler, but not both.

Any sensors integral to the original intercooler

or intake system must be retrofitted and be in

the correct location.

Note: aftermarket turbocharging kits that

include intercoolers that have been type

tested (ADR certified) for the model vehicle

are permitted. Documentary proof must be

retained to substantiate this.

(d) Airflow meters must not be disconnected.

They may be relocated, provided they are

functionally equivalent and are in the same

approximate location.

(e) Modified or aftermarket plenum chambers or

throttle bodies are not permitted.

Grey enough to get a roadworthy and a defect. It definately does not give the all clear for any intercooler set-up as long as you don't have a pod. I think their use of 'pod' was misplaced and should have been 'Open element'.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...