Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Traction rods... is the name given to that third short straight arm in the rear of a s13/R32/Cefiro etc. Ive got adjustable traction rods, camber arms and toe arms in my drift R32 and i am looking at further increasing my rear grip when the power is down.

I have had a bit of a play with adjusting the traction rod, but i am not sure which way i should be adjusting it and how much by.

So far my rear alignment is like this.

0.5 Degrees Camber

1mm total toe in

traction rod is 4mm shorter then stock.

High speed grip is great... how ever at the slower speed corners it just doesnt want to put the power down, also there seems to be a lack of mid corner grip at the front also.

Was thinking of changing the traction rod length again and see what else i can get happening. I understand that it is suppose to control how much toe you have while under squat... But yeah... i'd like some more info on this!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/161613-traction-rods/
Share on other sites

hmm yeah those specs i gave you work best for S13 (4mm) so there probaly is room for improvement with the ceffy. What coil-overs and rates are you using. i forget sorry.

and most importantly what make,size and model tyres.

Edited by URAS
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/161613-traction-rods/#findComment-3003311
Share on other sites

there was a good thread on ns.com about that rod a while ago - Trent URAS posted and a couple of other informative people replied too...

i think the final conclusion was not to change the length of it - if replacing with a adjustable one, set to standard length, this is just what i remember though so hopefully you can find the thread.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/161613-traction-rods/#findComment-3003974
Share on other sites

i wish someone would. I have ikeya formula traction rods in my GTR. When I put them in I had NFI how to set them up. I can see they look to effect a small toe change too when adjusted.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/161613-traction-rods/#findComment-3011675
Share on other sites

OOOH goody, a chance to get technical.

Let’s start off with what I do when fitting adjustable rear camber bushes, as most people know I don’t use aftermarket arms, but the principles are the same.

First thing is to stick the car on the wheel aligner and set the toe to where I want it. Let’s say 2 mm toe in each side.

Then I remove the upper control arms and the traction rods and fit the adjustable bushes. Put them back in the car and adjust the camber to where I want it. Let’s say 1.25 degrees negative.

Then I check the toe alignment, it should be 2 mm toe in each side. If it isn’t, I use the traction rods (not the tie rods) to correct the toe. Why? Because this means the car now has the same amount of bump steer that it had with the standard arms (and bushes) in it. Basically as Nissan designed it. Sometimes it is necessary to go back and readjust the camber, but it is usually just a fine tune, if anything at all.

If you haven’t followed the above process, then you most likely have stuffed the bump steer, and it is rear steering all over the place. Like it still had HICAS but worse for traction. So what do you do?

You need a bump steer gauge, although you can do it on the wheel aligner, if you go about it the right way. This is what I do;

First thing is to remove the rear wheels, then the spring and shock units from the car. Put the rear wheels back on and use axle stands to set it at the normal ride height.

Then check the alignment, using the above it should still be 2mm toe in. Now jack the rear suspension up 50 mm and check the toe settings, it should still be 2mm toe in. Then jack the rear suspension up another 50 mm and check the toe settings, it should still be 2mm toe in. Now drop it down 150 mm and check the toe, it should still be 2mm toe in. Another 50 mm down, same toe, 2 mm in.

Swap over and do the other side, same process, 4 measurements at 4 different heights. If the toe is always 2 mm in on both sides, then you have zero bump steer.

But if the toe changes as you go up and down, then you have to adjust the traction rods until you eliminate the bump steer. This can take a few goes on each side, as small adjustments are required.

The final step is to make that the camber is still the desired 1.25 degrees negative both sides.

If you want to have some fun, try going up another 50 mm (to 150 mm) in the suspension travel. Then watch the bump steer and camber go all to shit. That’s why it’s a stupid idea to lower Skylines much below 340 mm at the rear.

Good luck and happy measuring

::( cheers :(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/161613-traction-rods/#findComment-3012860
Share on other sites

How do you adjust the Whiteline camber bushes while on the car? With the upper control arm I just use the standard camber pins, but I'm not too sure I can see a way to adjust the traction arm bush?

Remove the inner end bolt, pop the end of the arm up and twist the eccentric crush tube. It's a fiddle, but you only have to do it the first time you install them.

:happy: Cheers :happy:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/161613-traction-rods/#findComment-3015034
Share on other sites

Ah, I thought it might be something like that. Now just have to set aside a couple of hours to use the wheel aligner...

If you opt for a different amount of toe on the rear, do you have to change it again?

Nope, same as the front.

Once you do the bump steer correction, it won't change unless you change the length or pick up points of the control arms.

Changing toe settings should have zero effect on bump steer.

:rofl: cheers ;)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/161613-traction-rods/#findComment-3015500
Share on other sites

LOL...you guys :laugh:

Just do what i do and drive around whatever ill handling heap of sh1t Nissan it is you drive. Must cheaper :)

lol I thought I was the only one that did that....good to hear I am in good company Roy

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/161613-traction-rods/#findComment-3016236
Share on other sites

excellent info gary.

I'd be interested to see what you think about my current arrangement, I set the traction arms to 4mm shorter then stock, and my ride height is about 320/320mm all round, I do know that it should be higher however the HSD"s in my car wont go any higher then that. So since the car is already lowered a fair way, and under drift conditions the rear see's a fair bit more squat, i was trying to gain as much traction i can.

Alignment as 1mm toe in, 1 degree camber and 4mm shorter traction arm.

I have a feeling that after reading what you have read that i probably have gone too far and they need to be closer to standard arm lengths.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/161613-traction-rods/#findComment-3019788
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
    • Well this shows me the fuel pump relay is inside the base of the drivers A Pillar, and goes into the main power wire, and it connects to the ignition. The alarm is.... in the base of the drivers A Pillar. The issue is that I'm not getting 12v to the pump at ignition which tells me that relay isn't being triggered. AVS told me the immobiliser should be open until the ignition is active. So once ignition is active, the immobiliser relay should be telling that fuel pump relay to close which completes the circuit. But I'm not getting voltage at the relay in the rear triggered by the ECU, which leaves me back at the same assumption that that relay was never connected into the immobiliser. This is what I'm trying to verify, that my assumption is the most likely scenario and I'll go back to the alarm tech yet again that he needs to fix his work.      Here is the alarms wiring diagram, so my assumption is IM3A, IM3B, or both, aren't connected or improper. But this is all sealed up, with black wiring, and loomed  
×
×
  • Create New...