Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 156
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

At 8am the rain held out but the track temp was very low and with last nights rain will make good run times very hard to get.

With a turn out of around 50+ cars, by the second run peoples times were droping and some where making personal bests with the cooler weather.

Oh I did not get a pic but Abbo bob did sorta brake his car I'll let the story be told by him. There where a few cars towards the end that had to pull out due too risk or have done minor damage.

A big congrats go out to AMY and Vic for there top effort and if my memory is correct Victor got a 14.035.

Well here they are enjoy

also open up two pics the group pic on the hill.. Smoky is getting up to no good And also the 300z pic it looks arsome

post-35764-1174798376.jpg

post-35764-1174798391.jpg

post-35764-1174798413.jpg

post-35764-1174798436.jpg

post-35764-1174798457.jpg

post-35764-1174798478.jpg

post-35764-1174798499.jpg

post-35764-1174798518.jpg

post-35764-1174798536.jpg

post-35764-1174798555.jpg

post-35764-1174798575.jpg

post-35764-1174798593.jpg

post-35764-1174798610.jpg

post-35764-1174798647.jpg

post-35764-1174798663.jpg

post-35764-1174798684.jpg

post-35764-1174798702.jpg

post-35764-1174798718.jpg

post-35764-1174798775.jpg

post-35764-1174798793.jpg

post-35764-1174798810.jpg

post-35764-1174798827.jpg

post-35764-1174798852.jpg

post-35764-1174798867.jpg

post-35764-1174798883.jpg

Edited by nuttsHunglow

Their were no standout times, 2 or 3 cars were in the 12's the rest were 13-15sec. Every 2nd LS1 was into the mid 11's with the help of an auto and a turbo/supercharger.

In other words we got absolutely spanked by the LS1's which have become really good consistent cars now that they have discovered forced induction.

did anyone get booted for being too good ?

Their was 1 bloke in a ute with nos that ran 11.02, 11.05 and 11.10 (it was a 10sec car he was just taking it easy over the line i believe) and they had no issues with it.

Edited by benm

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Block bump. $400. As above cyl 6 needs bore or sleeve.
    • I would think making the argument that the travel is limited by a spring flexing against a spring perch as "the same method". Later on in the document they do state that the spring can't bind on full bump travel and cannot come loose in full rebound travel as well. (which is all very sensible). The laws are actually pretty sensible and reasonable. It's just that the people who enforce and check them don't actually read them or know them accurately. "Oh, coilovers? Instant fail mate. Don't even need to look at it." - Guy who will be instantly reported by me. There is probably merit to people who do get defected for height also get defected for the suspension in that state that allows it. I did never consider the people who are complaining about coilovers being picked on are also running around at 50mm off the floor.
    • I think given SAU's knowledge of E85 we can strongly conclude that 10% ethanol in almost any situation is entirely fine. Almost all of the myths against E85 were overblown, let alone E10.
    • From your link See bold text, is this referring to damper settings, if so that may a issue for "some" inspectors, I cannot see aftermarket coilovers having the evidence that "must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original" Maybe just remove the adjustment knows and hope for the best???? Meh 5.2 Suspension travel In all instances, modifications to a vehicle’s suspension must ensure the integrity of the system and not compromise the ride quality. At least two thirds of the original suspension travel should be maintained in both directions (rebound (i.e. extension) and bump (i.e. compression)), and rebound must be limited by the same method used by the vehicle manufacturer or if this is not practicable due to the nature of the modification, an equivalent method. If an alternative method is used, evidence must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original.
    • They actually don't - They adhere to VSB14 rules just like Victoria. The rules are against CABIN adjustable height, and it quite clearly states that the height has to be within parameters. I asked the VASS engineer to confirm this when I got my car engineered and they refused to engineer the coilovers because they didn't meet the requirements for requiring engineering. (mine are height adjustable.) People "Not wanting to bother" with "Actually reading/knowing/adhering to the rules" should result in fines and immediately losing the ability to issue blue slips and/or RWC's in Vic.
×
×
  • Create New...