Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

.86 rear housing, .60 front, made 250kw on low boost, virtually no lagg over stock turbo

Do you have graphs to back up this wild claim? 250kw, low boost, no lag :)

I am in the market for a turbo, so i do have a geniune interest.

before you put up an insult do some investigation yourself. check the link below, the lower rated 28/71r is rated at 390hp which equals about 285 kws.

who is talking bs now??????

http://www.horsepowerinabox.com/HPIAB2/turbochart.htm

great turbo upgrade for rb's. buyer will be happy. depending on sizings, it is the equivalent of the HKS GTRS

larger ARR and trim will be more suited to rb25

i run one in the smaller ARR and trim on my rb20 and made 230rwkws on 18psi with better response than the neo turbo i had on previous

Since item is sold, i'll reply:

before you put up an insult do some investigation yourself. check the link below, the lower rated 28/71r is rated at 390hp which equals about 285 kws.

who is talking bs now??????

http://www.horsepowerinabox.com/HPIAB2/turbochart.htm

Doing research is one thing, understanding it is another :( ; and unfortunately you have not understood the specs.

This turbo is rated at 440hp=310kw approx

This 310kw is at maximum flow at flywheel in ideal conditions without losses, etc. Consider losses in driveline, fuel inconsistancies, engine wear, etc and you'll probably have 250rwkw, but at maximum flow (max. boost), which is far higher than the 12psi claimed.

So try and understand what you read, before going off at people.

rb20inside: The Neo turbo is larger than the r33 rb25 turbo. So yes the Neo would be pretty damn laggy on a 20 :happy: 230rwkw at 18psi sounds about right for this turbo.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • neither stumble or cut really seem to be an appropriate term....hard to explain its like a rev limiter but at 4k, but it violently shakes engine and entire vehicle as the rpms will not rise over 4k, even with slow acceleration. as soon as it hits 4k, it sounds like entire spark is lost entirely. plugs were 1.1 which I used as such, but later put in new plugs gapped down to .8 changed back after issue arose when I replaced the coils, still does it with either plug gap...damn and it was all running so good.
    • Oh how times have changed! I actually lean it out relative to my water/methanol injector duty cycle. The methanol adds a lot of fueling and you can then lean it out even more due to reduced knock. 
    • Yeah my thoughts are the same, a well thought out WMI setup, would be slightly ahead of just straight E85 and you're also chemically intercooling the charged air, dropping it even further. This is why you need to add so much more fuel as soon as you spray. I remember someone taking me through their set up before (Dennis, has a R33, lives around Cabramatta - no idea if he's still around on this forum). He would target AFR 10:1 on 98, then as WMI ramped on, AFR would lean back up to 11:1. Amazingly, he did this all through his PowerFC, a relay to cut power to his EBC solenoid if there was not enough line pressure on his WMI kit. And of course, if there wasn't any boost made above gate pressure, you wouldn't be accessing the load cells with heaps of timing for WMI. One downside to that rudimentary setup, once the WMI came on, the EBC would unleash the dragon, and of course all the timing. Tyres would fry lol.
    • Shimmed or shimless, still solid, no hydraulic pump up stuff.
    • They have said food will be limited. Mainly meat pies and sausage rolls from memory. But they have a coffee van!
×
×
  • Create New...