Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

387886893_a6f51a2797_o.jpg

LOLOLOL

thast hilarious

see, its funny how an 18x8 +30 rim would stick out to far, however an 18x9 +0 doesnt?

i think theres more to the story, like an idiot behind the wheel

but on a side not, that would be some easy harness relocation there, the fender is almost all the way off!

what kind of fitment are you wanting? sunken or flush with the body?

to be conservatiev in the rear go 8 +15-+20

for the front since you can actually usea lower offset id go +0t to +10

however, if you do go with the offsets above please run a 215/40 or 45 tire so you dont rub the inner lip ont eh fender please

however if you want to go a little wider (9s are plenty)

if you go 9 x+25 or +30 all around on stock body (no rolling or pulling) SHOULD fit without poking at all. but i always roll my fenders so i cant tell you for sure since i rolled them as soon as i could

preferrably flush with body, legally I dont think you can go over 8" wide here as stock are 7"

I was hoping to get the same offset all round, so if need be I could rotate them, but this may not be possible along with having the nice flush look.

well the problem is the huns on the front are further in than the rear

If you wanted to go flush all the way aroundk you COULD, but youd need to slightly roll the rear fenders so you can clear the tires

but honestly, if the skyline/cefiro/S chassis guys can do it, what is stopping you guys?

you really think they are going to stop you and say , hey your wheels are too wide.....just say it came with 8s from teh facotry or something

They go off whats on your tyre placard, and it says factory is 7" widest, but yes most people dont give a rats.

But for example, how do you think 18x8's with a +35 offset would look all round?

according to the calculations

the rear wont be baddddd maybe a 10mm spacer

but you should get maybe a 20mm spacer for the front

its gonna be hugely sunken

thatswhy i hate stageas wheel fitment sometimes. its backwards compared to everything else. lower offsets front higher in the rear is weird

according to the calculations

the rear wont be baddddd maybe a 10mm spacer

but you should get maybe a 20mm spacer for the front

its gonna be hugely sunken

thatswhy i hate stageas wheel fitment sometimes. its backwards compared to everything else. lower offsets front higher in the rear is weird

If Beastien is worried about using 9 inch rims to stay legal, the last thing he wants is spacers!

Try this calculator, you can work out from your current wheels width and offset to how the new wheels will sit

http://www.1010tires.com/WheelOffsetCalculator.asp

because its illegal to have spacers on your car here...i was priveliged enough to get them on my stagea and find out that you cant have them legally on your car and insurance wont touch you if they are on your car :ninja:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
    • ECUtalk pages don't mention they support the ABS computer (consult port has more than one CAN), so you might just need a different scan tool. But, I would expect ABS is a different light to the brake warning/handbrake light, do you see an ABS light come on for a few seconds when you turn the key from ACC to IGN? But since you said: I'd have a look at the ABS sensors in the rear hubs to make sure they are not damaged, disconnected etc.
×
×
  • Create New...