Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The garret int gate (gt30-gt35) housings suffer a tad boost creep. The balancing of dump and wastegate pipe size is what makes or breaks a setup. An open mouth dump with these turbo's = boost creep, anything less than a 2" wastegate pipe when paired with a 3" dump = boost creep. Then there's the enlarging of wastegate flap size which does work well but requires a strong wastegate spring to prevent the flap being blown open due to back pressure within the scroll.

The HKS ProS housings run a large flap that does get blown open even with stiff actuators.

Rework the dump pipe, reduce the size of the wastegate pipe. Make it harder for the exhaust gas to flow out of that wastegate.

I've never seen it done but there's no reason why it wouldn't work it works int he opposite circumstance - boost creep.

Kinda off topic I know, but what was your MPH with those runs? Just wondering, as I'd expect 265rwkw to be around the 115mph mark?

113 mph - the best run was with track temps in high 40's, 35 degree day of all things. There is definately is more in it in tuning and boost level/control wise but I'm a bit sceptical on the bottom end holding up - I hate listening to them on a dyno pull.

Currently it's only got the 15 psi wastegate spring - even though it's a 15 psi spring as you start to make boost even 10 psi the wastegate feed will be weakening the spring tension allowing the wategate to blow open eventually. That's why a bleed style boost control and a 20 psi spring should make a difference.

Cheers

270rkw, hi-flow and the supporting mods...suspension blah blah

18psi @ just a tad over 3000rpm and holds stong to redline. Who is gonna complain about that.

btw 15psi and 18psi much f**k all difference with a high flow in terms of power....however watch ur mid range torque go through the roof.

The garret int gate (gt30-gt35) housings suffer a tad boost creep. The balancing of dump and wastegate pipe size is what makes or breaks a setup. An open mouth dump with these turbo's = boost creep, anything less than a 2" wastegate pipe when paired with a 3" dump = boost creep. Then there's the enlarging of wastegate flap size which does work well but requires a strong wastegate spring to prevent the flap being blown open due to back pressure within the scroll.

The HKS ProS housings run a large flap that does get blown open even with stiff actuators.

Rework the dump pipe, reduce the size of the wastegate pipe. Make it harder for the exhaust gas to flow out of that wastegate.

I've never seen it done but there's no reason why it wouldn't work it works int he opposite circumstance - boost creep.

Makes sense but I'd hate to re-work this! I'll try a few other things first.

Cheers

post-12959-1177239074.jpg

Edited by gtst25

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hope you aren't too sore after that one, might take a day or 2 to notice yet and I guess it is a loooooong drive home. On the bright side, tube frame front end is a thing at superlap, right?
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18rmVb1SKB/ 
    • The chart of front pressure to rear pressure (with one being on the x axis and the other being on the y axis) is not a straight line on a typical proportioning valve. At lower pressures there is a straight line with one slope, and at higher pressures that changes to a lower slope. That creates a bend in the line at that pressure, called the knee point. If you do not change the proportionng as the pressure gets higher, you will suffer excessive pressure (at one end of the car or the other, depending on which way you look at the proportioning action) and then get lockups at that end. The HFM BM57, from my memory of previous discussions, is based on the BM57 from a different car (to a Skyline), with a different requirement for the location of the knee point and the distribution of pressure front to rear, and so is not a good choice for an upgrade on a Skyline. Here's a couple of links to some old posts, one from here, one from elsewhere. A lot of it pertains to adjustable prop valves, but the idea is the same. There are plenty of discussions on here about this issue from al the many years of people wanting a cheap/accessible option. https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/ https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/  
    • Yeah dunno why johhny posted that here with no context, just post on FB/insta bro where he put it up?  Laine had an off at T4 during Thurs prac, he's ok, car is less than perfect, they are done for the weekend, he can fill in the rest. Bando also binned it like 100m up the road.   
    • I feel there must have been a FB/insta post and the weekend did not start well at all I hope everyone is all okay
×
×
  • Create New...