Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

260kw on stock injectors with all other supporting mods using slide hi-flow running 17 psi. Also the use of a nismo fuel pressure reg helped.

IMO all the supporting mods for that output would include injectors. The duty would be close if not 100% at high RPM i.e. it its static.

Its is not recommended to exceed 80% duty cycle. Otherwise you will run the risk of the injector not being able to open and close quickly enough, which causes the injector to float half open. This may lean the mixture out, which is not going to healthy for an engine at high revs and under full load which is where this occurs. Under static conditions the injector cannot control fuel delivery anymore and based on this my assumption is why ppl see good results from installing an FPRs to simply add more fuel under this circumstance. IMO this would be the caveman approach.

There is an arguement that it only happens at high RPM and that doesnt happen all the time. As mentioned before the AFRs would be a good guide to see if this is happening.

IMO if ur spending the money on everything else just buy some 550cc NISMO ones and be done with it for an app under 280 rwkw

550c NISMO injectors, would they manage at 300kw?

Also, when replacing the injectors, how long after until you consider changing the fuel rail and fuel pump?

Any need for a rising rate regulator....

550c NISMO injectors, would they manage at 300kw?

Also, when replacing the injectors, how long after until you consider changing the fuel rail and fuel pump?

Any need for a rising rate regulator....

I doubt u will get to 300 without a new pump.

also running 235rwkw on stock injectors and stock pump, no reg.

Ive also heard of people running big power (300rwkw) with stock injecctors..and I heard this from an exerienced tuner? But from what these forums say its impossible to run this/or dangerous to do so...it might be I dont know?

Im assuming that it may depend on the tuner and how he tunes it...People say rb25 AFM need to be upgraded over 220rwkw..mines fine at 235rwkw.

Its also good to consult with a tuner as they are the ones tuning these things on a daily basis and some for a long time.

my 2c

I wish i knew the explanation of different parts maxing out at different power. I know that no 2 parts are the same, though I have a good feeling is has sumthing to do with the tune.

Cheers

it has lots to do with the dyno IMO

it probably has most to do with that . the only other factor thats variable here is AFR , a lean mixture will make more power with less air and rich mixture will require more air to make the same power . i would expect most people who have a tune though will know what to look for in their AFRs so most tuners would be roughly the same as they are aiming for good AFR curve , so not enough to produce great variences . there will also be some variance in the calibration of each individual AFM , they may vary voltage slightly for a certain amount of measured air due to age or tolerance

but to get 30-40 rwkw difference i would say it would be mostly dyno variations with a bit of the above . i know my figures were on a notoriously conservative dyno

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hope you aren't too sore after that one, might take a day or 2 to notice yet and I guess it is a loooooong drive home. On the bright side, tube frame front end is a thing at superlap, right?
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18rmVb1SKB/ 
    • The chart of front pressure to rear pressure (with one being on the x axis and the other being on the y axis) is not a straight line on a typical proportioning valve. At lower pressures there is a straight line with one slope, and at higher pressures that changes to a lower slope. That creates a bend in the line at that pressure, called the knee point. If you do not change the proportionng as the pressure gets higher, you will suffer excessive pressure (at one end of the car or the other, depending on which way you look at the proportioning action) and then get lockups at that end. The HFM BM57, from my memory of previous discussions, is based on the BM57 from a different car (to a Skyline), with a different requirement for the location of the knee point and the distribution of pressure front to rear, and so is not a good choice for an upgrade on a Skyline. Here's a couple of links to some old posts, one from here, one from elsewhere. A lot of it pertains to adjustable prop valves, but the idea is the same. There are plenty of discussions on here about this issue from al the many years of people wanting a cheap/accessible option. https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/ https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/  
    • Yeah dunno why johhny posted that here with no context, just post on FB/insta bro where he put it up?  Laine had an off at T4 during Thurs prac, he's ok, car is less than perfect, they are done for the weekend, he can fill in the rest. Bando also binned it like 100m up the road.   
    • I feel there must have been a FB/insta post and the weekend did not start well at all I hope everyone is all okay
×
×
  • Create New...