Jump to content
SAU Community

How Much Boost Will Stock Injecters Handle

tezflow

By tezflow,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

khunjeng Veteran

khunjeng

Posted
Posted
260kw on stock injectors with all other supporting mods using slide hi-flow running 17 psi. Also the use of a nismo fuel pressure reg helped.

IMO all the supporting mods for that output would include injectors. The duty would be close if not 100% at high RPM i.e. it its static.

Its is not recommended to exceed 80% duty cycle. Otherwise you will run the risk of the injector not being able to open and close quickly enough, which causes the injector to float half open. This may lean the mixture out, which is not going to healthy for an engine at high revs and under full load which is where this occurs. Under static conditions the injector cannot control fuel delivery anymore and based on this my assumption is why ppl see good results from installing an FPRs to simply add more fuel under this circumstance. IMO this would be the caveman approach.

There is an arguement that it only happens at high RPM and that doesnt happen all the time. As mentioned before the AFRs would be a good guide to see if this is happening.

IMO if ur spending the money on everything else just buy some 550cc NISMO ones and be done with it for an app under 280 rwkw

Marco-R34GTT Grand Master

Marco-R34GTT

Posted
Posted

550c NISMO injectors, would they manage at 300kw?

Also, when replacing the injectors, how long after until you consider changing the fuel rail and fuel pump?

Any need for a rising rate regulator....

khunjeng Veteran

khunjeng

Posted
Posted
550c NISMO injectors, would they manage at 300kw?

Also, when replacing the injectors, how long after until you consider changing the fuel rail and fuel pump?

Any need for a rising rate regulator....

I doubt u will get to 300 without a new pump.

MZTRBO Experienced

MZTRBO

Posted
Posted

also running 235rwkw on stock injectors and stock pump, no reg.

Ive also heard of people running big power (300rwkw) with stock injecctors..and I heard this from an exerienced tuner? But from what these forums say its impossible to run this/or dangerous to do so...it might be I dont know?

Im assuming that it may depend on the tuner and how he tunes it...People say rb25 AFM need to be upgraded over 220rwkw..mines fine at 235rwkw.

Its also good to consult with a tuner as they are the ones tuning these things on a daily basis and some for a long time.

my 2c

MZTRBO Experienced

MZTRBO

Posted
Posted

I wish i knew the explanation of different parts maxing out at different power. I know that no 2 parts are the same, though I have a good feeling is has sumthing to do with the tune.

Cheers

32vspecII Mentor

32vspecII

Posted
Posted

it has lots to do with the dyno IMO

it probably has most to do with that . the only other factor thats variable here is AFR , a lean mixture will make more power with less air and rich mixture will require more air to make the same power . i would expect most people who have a tune though will know what to look for in their AFRs so most tuners would be roughly the same as they are aiming for good AFR curve , so not enough to produce great variences . there will also be some variance in the calibration of each individual AFM , they may vary voltage slightly for a certain amount of measured air due to age or tolerance

but to get 30-40 rwkw difference i would say it would be mostly dyno variations with a bit of the above . i know my figures were on a notoriously conservative dyno

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Duncan
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Duncan · Posted

      Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • funkymonkey
      Jacks that fit under GTR lips that can reach the subframe?

      By funkymonkey · Posted

      I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...