Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

$400,vgc,still has paint on comp wheel,no sideways play,

forumsales026.jpg

forumsales023.jpg

forumsales025.jpg

hey im very keen on ur turbo mine blew on my rb20 on thursday i got a replacemtn for it but turns out the coolant inlet and return fittings on my car are too small for the new turbo are u able to measure the diameter of the banjo bolts that go into the coolant galories on the turbo i can see the bolts on the pic but cant see size. please get back to me need my car on the raod by monday

Bakker - There's a tutorial on changing the rb20 turbo over to the RB25 .

I'm sure it says everything is a straight swap out, ie use the same lines, except the elbow

Don't need the turbo but I'll ask for everyone else sake cause they'll prolly ask...

1) Do you have elbow?

2) Location?

Good luck with the sale :sick:

Bakker - There's a tutorial on changing the rb20 turbo over to the RB25 .

I'm sure it says everything is a straight swap out, ie use the same lines, except the elbow

Don't need the turbo but I'll ask for everyone else sake cause they'll prolly ask...

1) Do you have elbow?

2) Location?

Good luck with the sale ;)

well ill the secound the fact that they r not a straight bolt on the oil feed is the same size

the coolant banjo bolts from an rb20 slide straight ing an rb25 turbo without even touching the thread

im also chasing the banjo bolts and water line for an rb25 turbo

well ill the secound the fact that they r not a straight bolt on the oil feed is the same size

the coolant banjo bolts from an rb20 slide straight ing an rb25 turbo without even touching the thread

im also chasing the banjo bolts and water line for an rb25 turbo

this guy knows what im on about. im wondering if the turbo that iv got isnt an rb25 turbo and not an rb20 turbo. hmmmm. im gonna try putting a helicoil in and bring the port down 2 mm. the port is 18mm and the banjo bolts i have are 16 mm, it would be good if the banjo fittings were oversized so i could put and 18mm banjo bolt in.

check out the tutorial - osme of the older r ugly poos used 22 m banjos, in that case, you'll hae to source some either later ugly poo lines, or rb25 lines. the later ones are 24 mm

later ugly poos have the right size banjos. I've even seen 89 modesl with the right size bolts - I think only the very early 89 models had the 22 mm

Looking at the turbo, how do you tell from pictures whether it's a series 1 or 2.

I know series 2 had a nylon compressor wheel, ie do we look for a dull compressor wheel whereas the series 1 are shiney? Or did they change the design of the compressor blades making it easier to distinguish?

Looking at the turbo, how do you tell from pictures whether it's a series 1 or 2.

I know series 2 had a nylon compressor wheel, ie do we look for a dull compressor wheel whereas the series 1 are shiney? Or did they change the design of the compressor blades making it easier to distinguish?

for 1 the wheel will make a plastic noise when u hit it u can see the difference and feel the difference

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...