Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

I'm going to be installing a FC Boost Controller kit but was wondering where to put the boost sensor.

Did you guys drill 2 holes in the metal frame of your car? If so, do the holes need to be threaded somehow?

I was thinking of just screwing it into the side of the plastic fuse box

Pics would be good if you have but not a must.

Thanks :)

Birnie

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/167033-apexi-boost-sensor-location/
Share on other sites

I was already using the vacuum line at the pressure regulator for my boost gauge, so I just tee'd into that near the firewall and mounted it behind the drivers side strut. you can just use 2 nuts and bolts too eh. maybe try to put some rust protectant on the holes if you drill them out or somehting, i just hate rust.

birns, just take the standard boost solenoid off and use that bracket :D

Either that, or on the strut tower, there are some pre threaded holes with a plug in it for an m6 bolt ;)

you can either mount the sensor usign one of those holes, or get a little bit of metal bracket from bunnings, and use the bolt hole a bolt the plate on :)

have fun - no need to drill.

I've popped it in where i said.

Removed the old sensor completely (easy as)

And attatched it to that.

It's only held on by one bolt but nice and secure and doesn;t look like it's going anywhere in a hurry.

I used the standard pressure feed line from the old sensor too but as it was so small, i couldn't get the little filter on.

I think it should be OK without it though, as the oldie didn't have one.

Oh yeah, the cables were long enough to go down the driver side corner throught were most people feed their boost lines, and reach all the way along the inner wall to the Power FC.

Not much left over but definaltly enough.

Schweeeeet :banana:

Also, i came with another loong cable which i didn't even use? What's with that?

Has to hack 2 wires and re-solder but that was pretty easy

Now to get tuned up...... exciting times for me !

All these new toys!

I love popping the bonnet and going. "i did that...n that..n that etc"

Such a show off, hehe

(And that's when there's no one else to show....oops)

I must admit, got done for speeding years ago.

They checked my bonnet which was OK.

They were pretty cool, got fined but i deserved it and they could see i was being co-operative, and so were they.

So i took the oportunity to ask em about my exhaust if it was too loud etc as i had no idea....they were.. no probs, rev it a few times and drop off.....no probs, not even close.

...and zen,

I was, "hey check out my Rev Speed Meter, look what it does"

Haha......so stupid when looking back, but they thought it was pretty funny :banana:

OK, here's some pics.

Solenoid is sitting on the same bracket as the original R33 solenoid using 2 zip ties for now.

(It will be 2 nuts/bolts when i can get some the right size)

That pic also shows the wiring to the original solenoid which was snipped and soldered back to the new solenoid.

Pretty obvious in the pic plus you can see the purple tipped socket waiting to be plugged back in.

post-5823-1178328352.jpg

Just for fun, i covered the APEXi sticker which states "BOOST CONTROL VALVE"...SIF !

post-5823-1178328308.jpg

And finally, the sensor mounted on the original sensor braket again.

One bolt only on the left/bottom (a bit hard to see) but tightened up and it stays level.

..and you can see the leads going off into the corner for the usual feed down to the grommet near the accelerator pedal.

post-5823-1178328271.jpg

  • 6 months later...

Birnie,

Mate could you post the pics up again as my PFC controler is not allowing any increase in boost, always sits at .96 bar no matter what i adjust.

Either have the wiring wrong or the piping wrong i think.

Hey mate, those photos are probably long gone but I'll check the PC.

Also, I'm in the GTST so i don't know how that would compare to the GTR twin setup??

I can always take more photos.....

Someone else has had issues with the setup and got it sorted on here with just typed responses.

keep searching......but if you get stuck and really need pics, i'll get something for you.

If you want....(i'm on night shift tonight and the car is downstairs) i can check where the pipes are going in and out..

Might be worth posting up pics of what you've done.

Cheers....Birnie

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...