Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Its not unheard of. Case in point - The current Holden Barina is inferior to the model it replaces, as Holden have obviously decided a lower priced/lower quality car will better suit the marketplace.

This doesn't apply, as Holden sources these cars from other GM brands, it doesn't desgin and build them itself like Nissan Japan did with the Skyline. Holden decided to switch from the European "Opel Corsa", to the cheaper Korean "Daewoo Kalos", while keeping the Barina name. Nissan obviously didn't do this.

It was not a comparison, I was answering his question but I guess you missed that bit.

Maybe, but it doesn't relate to this argument though does it? So its not relevant.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/167183-33-vs-32/page/2/#findComment-3105623
Share on other sites

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

This doesn't apply, as Holden sources these cars from other GM brands, it doesn't desgin and build them itself like Nissan Japan did with the Skyline. Holden decided to switch from the European "Opel Corsa", to the cheaper Korean "Daewoo Kalos", while keeping the Barina name. Nissan obviously didn't do this.

Maybe, but it doesn't relate to this argument though does it? So its not relevant.

Seriouly, I BEG that you read before you post things like this.

Smurf said:

Why would a car manufacture release a new model that isnt superior to the previous model?

Holden, have "released" their "new model" barina and it is NOT superior to the "previous model"

He asked a question and I answered it.... And then you tell me it does not relate to the argument.... I WAS ANSWERING HIS QUESTION...... PLEASE FFS don't make me say it again! :rant:

I know that the new barina is sourced from Daewoo but it is still the car Holden have released as the NEW barina!

Edited by r32line
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/167183-33-vs-32/page/2/#findComment-3107149
Share on other sites

in my opinion, a R33 puts power to the ground ALOT better than a tail happy, tyre frying R32 does. The R33 feels like a much more stable car and when lightly modified, is still a comfortable off boost daily driver. THe R32 is like a go kart, actually similar to a S13!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/167183-33-vs-32/page/2/#findComment-3107229
Share on other sites

I just picked up my R33 gtst, and after been in mates cars not actually driving them i can notice a diff that the R33 is much smoother

in my opinion, a R33 puts power to the ground ALOT better than a tail happy, tyre frying R32 does. The R33 feels like a much more stable car and when lightly modified, is still a comfortable off boost daily driver. THe R32 is like a go kart, actually similar to a S13!

couldn't agree any better there about boost their like a normal car .. IMHO..

Edited by Yme33
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/167183-33-vs-32/page/2/#findComment-3107299
Share on other sites

Hahaha, i dont agree with that statement at all. You cannot apply rules like 16% more power but only 6% more weight means its faster... I know the R33 is quicker (in a straight line) but just because one cars power to weight ratio is better than another cars it does not mean that car is going to be faster. How a car puts its power down introduces countless other variables....Tyres, AWD vs RWD vs FWD, Traction control system, launch control.... I wont bother continuing

I did say 'simplistically'. As for how the cars get their power down, I thought we were comparing GTS-t with GTS25-t? Both RWD without traction control/launch control. Both have VERY similar rear suspension (geometry, spring rates etc). We were comparing stock for stock, but I doubt anyone has stock tyres anymore, so we'll just assume same tyres for both, both have same sized rims so that shouldn't be a problem. Both have R200 VLSDs, so they'd both get the power down the same way there. Both have very similar gearbox ratios too. The difference is the R32 has a ~5% shorter diff ratio (4.363 vs 4.083 from memory) which would increase acceleration compared to the R33. But R33 has more torque at the engine to start with, so it's negated, leaving the R33 faster.

I realise you can't use power to weight all the time, but these 2 cars are VERY similar, so in this case, you can and it does work. The R33 IS faster in a straight line.

Edited by salad
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/167183-33-vs-32/page/2/#findComment-3110390
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
LOL

put an RB25 into an R32 ;)

then you get the power in a much nicer looking car.

sorry just had to say it

But then this whole discussion would prove pointless :(

Coming from a Honda background.. people always go on about Hondas being gay because they are small,light and reasonably qucik. My ITR, was just on 1000kg. Has a tiny 1800cc NA motor and would do 13.8 @ 100mph all day.

Then you get the people in their bigger Turbo cars saying things like " Well if my ****** was that light it would be 10x qucker than that shit ass Honda..." Is it me or is it just them trying to make their penises look bigger? *shrugs*

Kinda went off track. :thumbsup: My bad.. continue :( (would like to add im am currently in the market for an R33.. so im not a Steriotypical Honda driver :excl: )

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/167183-33-vs-32/page/2/#findComment-3138583
Share on other sites

Why nissan even bothered to make a 6 cylinder 2 litre engine is beyond me. It just added unnecessary weight to the 32. They already had some brilliant 2 litre engines laying around and should have used one of them.

As for looks, Every time i see a 32 I look for a backward baseball cap in the near vicinity or in the car itself.

The 33 is far more classic coupe design and will be the most timeless of all of them in the long run including the 34. (guess which one I drive) :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/167183-33-vs-32/page/2/#findComment-3145039
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I would be surprised if that wasn't the issue. It's probably telling you, that even if you remove the plastic liner, you may have some other clearance issues that may occur too in some scenarios. IE, tyre to guard. It looks like someone has already rolled the lip, but you may still have issues in the future IE, turning and hitting a bump etc. The fact it changes how bad it makes the noise when you are going backward vs forward is highly indicative that it's the tyre rubbing. They do make a terrible sound, even if you're only pushing a project car that has a liner hanging down on a tyre!   Has the car been lowered? If it has been, what is the measurement from the centre of the wheel hub to the lip of the guard straight up?
    • Summernats cruiser?
    • Mark's a bit smarter than people give him credit... He'd convince the person that is to become dead, to drive him to the forest first. That way his car has no evidence in it, and he's free to dispose of their vehicle permanently how he sees fit too...
    • But if you had to go bury a body in the forest, would you not put that in the boot? Most of them are >=90kg these days.
    • That could easily make a horrible noise. +1 to the benefits of: a) Disclosing all relevant information when asking questions such as these, b) Actually going out and having a look at your own car, seeing as you're the one there, and we're not!
×
×
  • Create New...