Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

HI GUYS,

i have found a good n cheap GT3040 for $1300 and was wondering how well this will go on a standard RB25 engine. I got stock internals, stock cams, stock plenum however got a powerfc, fmic, big injectors n pump, intake etc. I am aiming at 260rkw which i know ill get but will my internals hold and will i get lag from this turbo?

Is it tooo big for standard RB25, will i stress it, or will i just get lag?

thanks

john

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/167495-gt3040-on-a-standard-rb25-yes-or-no/
Share on other sites

compressor is larger the exhaust? what the? are u sure ?

Very common Paul :P

The engine should be right, if the tune is kept SAFE and a little on the conservative side. This should be half decent on a rb25. The smaller ext housing will provide a faster spool up, but will limit peak power. At a later stage, if you thirst more power, you can always upgrade to a .83 ext housing, which is a better match for this turbo.

All the best. Make sure the flange is suited to a rb25 manifold.

Very common Paul :P

The engine should be right, if the tune is kept SAFE and a little on the conservative side. This should be half decent on a rb25. The smaller ext housing will provide a faster spool up, but will limit peak power. At a later stage, if you thirst more power, you can always upgrade to a .83 ext housing, which is a better match for this turbo.

All the best. Make sure the flange is suited to a rb25 manifold.

thanks mate but what u mean the right flange. its a t3 flange however this turbo came off an sr setup. doesnt any t3 exhuast falnge bolt up to the rb25 t3 manifold.

thanks

john

Very common Paul :P

The engine should be right, if the tune is kept SAFE and a little on the conservative side. This should be half decent on a rb25. The smaller ext housing will provide a faster spool up, but will limit peak power. At a later stage, if you thirst more power, you can always upgrade to a .83 ext housing, which is a better match for this turbo.

All the best. Make sure the flange is suited to a rb25 manifold.

^ wat he said!

the only time u will see the exhaust housing bigger then the compressor housing will be on a rotor or a bigger engine eg. V8, truck even ur standard turbo has a smaller compressor housing then ur exhaust housing

being a .63 rear exhaust housing it will provide very fast spool on a 2.5L engine BUT will limit power up high in the rev range but if ur only looking for 260rwkw this turbo wont have a problem giving it to u, this turbo will make alot more power then that i made 276.6rwkw with a standard bottom end with a SR20

the rear exhaust housing has a .86 option so u can always change it at a later date if u want more topend power but the price u pay for more power will be lag

oh im the one selling the turbo by the way :)

Edited by STR8E180

lol the pic gave it away lololol ill make my decision based on wat else i need to install but should be a problem

^ wat he said!

the only time u will see the exhaust housing bigger then the compressor housing will be on a rotor or a bigger engine eg. V8, truck even ur standard turbo has a smaller compressor housing then ur exhaust housing

being a .63 rear exhaust housing it will provide very fast spool on a 2.5L engine BUT will limit power up high in the rev range but if ur only looking for 260rwkw this turbo wont have a problem giving it to u, this turbo will make alot more power then that i made 276.6rwkw with a standard bottom end with a SR20

the rear exhaust housing has a .86 option so u can always change it at a later date if u want more topend power but the price u pay for more power will be lag

oh im the one selling the turbo by the way :P

well i can give u a list of wat ur going to need

because the turbo is external gated ur going to need an external gate

and because u need an external gate to control boost ur only to need a manifold with an outlet to fit an external gate onto

and ur going to need ur intercooler pipe moded to suit the compressor housing outlet, ur also going to need a new intake pipe because the compressor housing inlet is 4inch so ur going to need a new 4inch air filter (K&N fits perfect)

ur also going to need new oil and water lines made up and a new dump pipe

if are u are in sydney i will be able to make up all the new intercooler pipe + intake pipe + dump pipe for u

im a fabricator by the way

A couple of things I'd be concerned about .

1) Personally I'm not a fan of the big 82mm OD compressors on the 60mm turbine .

2) Advertised as a "4 bolt" turbine housing . Make sure its got the conical stand off on the back of it or its not a propper

GT30 turbine housing . Only available in T3 flange .63/.82/1.06 from Garrett , both integral and external wastegate .

No offense but I think its brave to compare turbine and compressor housing A/R ratios because they live in totally different environments . The difference in temperature of the gasses let alone pulsed exhaust gasses make their requirements very different .

Its entirely possible to run quite large divided turbine housings because the whole expansion of the hot exhaust gasses across a pulse divided system means venting into an area of lower pressure and ultimately volume on the way from the exhaust valves to the turbine blades . The single scroll turbine housing forces you to size its A/R ratio to work a bit like a venturi or nozzle to accelerate the gasses into the turbines inducer blades . If you have to do it this way the roads to rapid transients and acceptable boost threshold is to use conservative compressor wheels that need the least turbine energy to get them cracking .

This may make you laugh but Garrett would have been better off doing the GT3082R the other way round compared to a GT3582R ie the GT35's turbine with the GT3076R's compressor making it a GT3576R . That way you get the larger turbine shaft torque to drive the 76mm GT compressors power needs . THEN if you have to pull back on turbine housing A/R at least you get sufficient power from the 68mm vs 60mm turbine .

Funnily enough Garrett do make the GT3576 and GT3576R but its in the larger centre section (the ball bearing version) and I believe its the diesel spec HP turbine rather than the petrol performance spec UHP turbine . A "GT3576R" would be like an upsized real GT3071R ie turbine diametre closer to compressor diametre . The real GT3071R is 60/71mm diametres whe a "GT3576R" would be 68/76mm . One who worked for Garrett Aftermarket US did tell me this combination would be good but there is also going to be a slight turbine innertia issue . I think you could get around this easily enough with well thought out manifolds/turbine housings and as always tuning .

Off the topic , IMO the GT3082R is the wrong way round and tries to drive a 680 Hp capable compressor with a 500 Hp capable turbine . I think people find the things laggy because the turbine can't develop enough shaft power at low engine speed/exhaust gas velocity to supply the power an ~ 62lb/min (air) capable compressor . The real GT3076R's compressor is good for ~ 53-54lb/min and the real GT3071R's ~ 50lbs/min .

I reckon using the .63 A/R turbine housing on a GT3082R merely forces higher exhaust gas velocity into the turbine which my get it going but prematurely chokes up the exhaust side - its the engine that suffers .

Cheers A .

I reckon using the .63 A/R turbine housing on a GT3082R merely forces higher exhaust gas velocity into the turbine which my get it going but prematurely chokes up the exhaust side - its the engine that suffers .

Cheers A .

Which is generally why the GT3082's make bugger all if any more power over the GT3076's UNLESS they are pumped full of 100+ron fuel and or water meth injection.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Actually, that's not entirely true. It's also the same motor in the 1st gen Nissan Cube but they're rare as hen's teeth.  
    • Yeah it is always worth testing and balancing actuators out of the box, just set the pressure regulator on a compressor very low (eg 5 psi) and increase it slowly to see when they both move.....unfortunately while you may be able to adjust the length of the actuator rod to minimise any difference, the actual pressure they move from is not adjustable so you need a well matched pair. And yes, the VCAM is probably contributing; the earlier in the rev range they come on boost and the slower the revs build (I think your demo was in 5th), the more you notice it.  Driving at WOT through 1st, 2nd, 3rd etc you will probably never hear it as any shuffling starts and is over super quickly
    • oh they were with that motor, you need to remove the engine to change the spark plugs (don't have to, but it does make it easier)
    • I certainly fall into the annoyed camp, but glad to hear that if it's happening at low boost then I'm not likely going to blow a turbo and end up with metal shards in my oil. Just feels like it prevents me from really driving it without hesitation and "peak" performance. Wonder if it's the VCAM, it did an impressive job of shifting the torque curve and faster spool, but maybe now it's "too fast" and there's too much air for how open the throttle is.  Based on some other threads, will also do some reading on synchronizing the actuators. They are the default actuators that come on the Garrett's and I would think they would be set the same coming from the factory, but if the turbos don't actually work exactly the same way at the same time as previously mentioned, it would be worth making sure the actuators are actuating together properly
    • I went down this rabbit hole before, ended up sourcing a motor from the UK (I'm in Japan) which also didn't function correctly. With the original motor, I disassembled it and reassembled it and it works somewhat, sometimes. What I could deduce from all my screwing around is that there is calibration of the gears on the inside of the motor and two ramps on the main gear which activate switches that operate the motor and move the sunroof either to retract into the roof or tilt. Where I got stuck was that, it seemed in my case that one or both of the switches that are activated by the ramp on the gear did not always activate and thus the motor did not move, causing it to sometimes not retract or tilt (apologies, I've forgotten which way it didn't work.).  Of course this part is discontinued at Nissan now, it's the same part in the S15 but no other models. I also contacted the manufacturer of the component for schematics - forgot the name, they're based in Gifu - but they declined to share the information due to being bound by an NDA, sadly. Looking through my pictures now, it seems I last had a crack at this in 2022. See, I so kindly wrote "open" and "close" next to the switches. If you figure it out, please do tell me. Those little switches, with the red buttons may need to be replaced.
×
×
  • Create New...