Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok I've just about been reading everything thread on "whirring" "thrust" or "input shaft" that came up when I searched for an hour, and I'm still very confused as there are lot of people saying opposite things. The symptoms of my car is this:

Car in neutral with clutch OUT: whirring noise occurs

Car in neutral with clutch DEPRESSED: noise dissappears and no other noise present

Car in gear: no noticable noise except at strictly 2000-2500rpm where a rattling noise occurs. Although not sure if this is the Diff or Gearbox.

I would like to know if this is a thrust bearing or input shaft bearing problem? As far as I know, to replace the input shaft bearing its a matter of opening the gearbox yes? And to replace the thurst bearing, it doesn't require the gearbox to be opened but can be done when changing the clutch?

I will be replacing my clutch in the near future as I believe it is still the stock clutch and I am upgrading the turbo, and as these parts are ~$20-40 (correct?) I would like to fix this problem.

Thanks,

Andy

Sounds like it could be the input shaft bearing, this is shown by the clutch being out and the noise occuring.. (e.g. engine is engaged and rotating the input shaft) - does it change noise with revving the engine? I doubt it's the throwout bearing as this would usually do it when you push the clutch in..

Input shaft bearing is opening the gearbox, a new thrust bearing comes with most clutch kits.. Doubt its your diff.. Either way gearbox has to be pulled down..

Mines been doing that for three years.Makes it feel like a racing car.vroom vroom.....just kidding,it should be ok as mine has been to Wakefield a couple of times and not any noisier.

if it's a loud whirring then the bearing is on the way out. my car was basically a minter when i bought it and still made a little noise in neutral, clutch out. it's not noticeable unless I listen for it though, and I have a stock exhaust.

when you get the clutch done, tell them about the noise symptom and make sure they grease/replace any bearings that need it. opening the gearbox is a bigger deal so I'd try and avoid it unless you've done the clutch and the noise is still just as bad.

Most likely the input shaft bearing then. :D

How much does this part cost? And is it an easy job to replace? Say I'm paying a Workshop to fit my clutch in and since the box is out, how much might it cost to get them to open it up and replace the bearing?

What causes failure to these parts by the way? I don't want to have to replace the part only to have it end up failing again.

Most likely the input shaft bearing then. :rolleyes:

How much does this part cost? And is it an easy job to replace? Say I'm paying a Workshop to fit my clutch in and since the box is out, how much might it cost to get them to open it up and replace the bearing?

What causes failure to these parts by the way? I don't want to have to replace the part only to have it end up failing again.

I had my input shaft bearing done 12 months ago when i got my new clutch done and it was noisey again within 6 months, its just one of those things if you replace it the noise will come back eventually anyways.

Hahah, that always a good sign!

Its the input shaft bearing for sure. You can have it changed without stripping the box if your mechanic has sutiable pullers the get the bearing out by pulling in the circlip groove.

LOL dave.. yes.. that's a problem LOL..

If you are going to get the input shaft bearing replaced you might as well look at getting the 1st/2nd gear synchro's done at the same time.. Mine's been bad for a year, but haven't got it changed, if you get an oil change and find bearings in or pieces of the bearing cage in the oil than that's not the best!!..

I would suggest taking it somewhere, and get a quote..

has anyone ever DIY'ed the input shaft bearing?

Would love to have a crack but I think it's a fair bit out of hands.

I have the same symptons in neutral, except in first and second my car continues to whine.

you have to remove the selector fork for 3/4 to get to it. but im going to get all the bearings done in mine. cheaper than a new box lol.

unless anyone knows where to get a route6 gearset????

Dave ive got a cross mission that will be up for sale very shortly with new bearings and syncros. Its basicly just a hollinger, I keep breaking 3rd so im finially biting the bullet and fitting a Trust dog box.

Ive been getting around without 3rd for a while now you get used to it after a while.

Same old story mechanic that couldnt be bothered!

My rb20 gearbox started making some horrible noises with the clutch out, in neutral or in gear and driving.. got so bad I thought it was going to let go with any harsh clutch/throttle movements, the new rb20 box makes a tiny bit of noise if you listen hard but nothing like the old one! But as everyone has said, clutch in - thrust bearing, clutch out - gearbox.

hrmm sounds like my issue. except for part of a bearing cage i pulled off the magnet :D

there's a pretty good chance that its not the input shaft bearing then, they are a sealed bearing. what you have is most likely the bearing cage of one of the bearings in the sandwhich plate which holds the cluster of gears these 2 bearings are not sealed and use the gearbox oil to lubricate them. i've had this exact problem with 2 of my gearboxes.

mine makes this noise aswel! when i bought my car the noise wasnt there as much but then for i wile i was dumping it in2 second gear and then the noise just got louder..i changed the gearbox oil and the noise quietened down a little but is still there..

  • 4 months later...

Just researching this problem, as my car seems to have a similar issue. Same as in first post. Have had the car for 12 months, noise has not gotten any worse, have taken the car to skidpan days and took it to texikhana, noise is still not worse. Is this something I can leave until I get the clutch replaced? Or should I have a look into it? As car has been fine to drive, apart from 5th crunching if I change too quickly into it from 4th.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Kapr Haha yeah thats the one. I missed that you had a built up engine, I wouldn't want to run it on there either then. It was good in my situation just to replace the original turbo on a stock engine. @MBS206Yep definitely not a replacement for anything name brand
    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
×
×
  • Create New...