Jump to content
SAU Community

rb25 beemer


Recommended Posts

I've seen a RB25 in an E30, it was being done by Rollins Imports on the Gold Coast (ads in zoom if you want a no.), the actual engine fitted ok (remebering that the BMW engine bay is already designed for a straight 6 engine, but they did have issues fitting in a radiator and intercooler, so you might want to see if you can ask them about that. I've just put and RB20DET (which is the same dimensions as the 25) into my '77 520i, and it fits beautifully, looks like it was factory, but i've probably got a bit bigger engine bay. I also have no room for a FMIC, i'm running a top mount water-to-air jobbie. Thats more related to the front bar design on my car though, so you might be ok.

I notice you're in toowoomba, if you want to come and check my car out sometime (not that it's verry impressive atm), even just to compare the size of the engine bay, let me know and we can arrange something.

Hope that helps in some small way,

Cheers

Belly_up

Hope that helps in some way

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/16887-rb25-beemer/#findComment-348433
Share on other sites

Forget it, too expensive. I had a E30 ('85) 323i rebuilt as as 2.8L. The thing is if you want a RB, you'll have to change the tranny and diff too - i popped 4 diffs. Get a 3 series inline 6 second hand, drop it in with the box and diff and turbo it. It wil boogie.

Heres some links for you:

http://www.bmauto.iinet.net.au/

http://www.bavariacars.com.au/

http://www.kormanfastbmw.com/

http://www.bmwe30.net/

I miss my E30 beemer :spank:

and heres a pic :(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/16887-rb25-beemer/#findComment-348959
Share on other sites

the other thing to look out for is that the BMW motors are intake on the the passenger side, exhaust on the drivers side, whereas the nissans are the other way around. So you'll have manifolding in different places from normal. for me this was a good thing, as it gave me more clearance for exhaust manifolding (my beamer has a huge steering gbox on the drivers side, i think the e30 i saw was much better in that respect), but it might be different for you.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/16887-rb25-beemer/#findComment-349043
Share on other sites

yeah, about 6 months after i started my RB20 conversion, i found out that if i'd looked in the right place, i could have done the BMW motor for much cheaper than what i originally thought. Although if you want to go the turbo route, you're up for a turbo, custom exhaust manifold, intercooler, possibly injectors, possibly decompression of the engine, and definately aftermarket ecu, all straight away, whereas the RB25 already comes with most, if not all of that stuff.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/16887-rb25-beemer/#findComment-349419
Share on other sites

I can vouch for Belly_up seeing Rolin Imports dropping the RB25DET into the E30 Beemer. It was a black car by memory. The stage i saw it in (this was well over 18 months ago) was when they just lowered the engine & tranny into it with the fabricated mounts. they were struggling for engine bay real estate, that's for sure. they had to actually cut a piece of the Rb25 timing cover to clear one of the intercooler pipes which crossed over. very tight fit. the car sat very low (stock springs?) with this engine. the guys there doubted its weight bias front to rear. i doubt it would have handled well being front heavy. i'd go down the SR20DET path if it was me and i wanted a great handling chassis. but if straight line stuff is more the go, then by all means, the RB is still a great choice.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/16887-rb25-beemer/#findComment-350452
Share on other sites

The 'big block' 3.5 straight six is more of an effort to fit compared to a 2.5 twin cam or 2.3-3L from a later E46. The block of the 'small block' inline 6 hasn't really changed in the last 20 years (virtually the same external dimensions), so it is much easier to drop in with minor crossmember mods etc. By memory all that is needed is a sump modification - it wil fit with stock engine mounts.

The 3.5 is also a fair bit heavier, whereas the twin cams from the later E36 on are only marginally heavier and will not disrupt the balance as much. They will more or less match the older big block single cam straight sixes for power, but less torque.

I would seriously stick to the small block twin cam six from a later car. Make sure you check out the BM Auto Engineering website i posted above - they have done E36 M3 engine / gearbox transplants into E30s and they fly...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/16887-rb25-beemer/#findComment-352361
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
    • Well this shows me the fuel pump relay is inside the base of the drivers A Pillar, and goes into the main power wire, and it connects to the ignition. The alarm is.... in the base of the drivers A Pillar. The issue is that I'm not getting 12v to the pump at ignition which tells me that relay isn't being triggered. AVS told me the immobiliser should be open until the ignition is active. So once ignition is active, the immobiliser relay should be telling that fuel pump relay to close which completes the circuit. But I'm not getting voltage at the relay in the rear triggered by the ECU, which leaves me back at the same assumption that that relay was never connected into the immobiliser. This is what I'm trying to verify, that my assumption is the most likely scenario and I'll go back to the alarm tech yet again that he needs to fix his work.      Here is the alarms wiring diagram, so my assumption is IM3A, IM3B, or both, aren't connected or improper. But this is all sealed up, with black wiring, and loomed  
×
×
  • Create New...