Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

For sale: Series 5 Jap import Rx7

Item Condition: Immaculate condition, mechanically, body and interior.

Price and price conditions:$14,000 All offers invited via pm, $13K without wheels, will supply alloy 15"wheels, will discuss price with serious people.

Extra Info: I'm the first and only Australian owner, car has travelled approx 63K's. Will come with Rego

Body:

Bare metal respray approx 12 months ago

Painted in House Of Kolor Orion Silver, same as Garry Myers Silver Bullet

Standard bodywork, no mods

Boot spoiler was never fitted from factory

US spec rear light up markers fitted

Driveline

Standard series 5 motor 63 thousand k's

KnightSports 320 highflow

KnightSports FCD

KnightSports ecu

K&N pod filter

Superlight billet flywheel, heat treated from Extreme Rotaries

Exeddy HHD clutch cover

Exeddy 5 puck sprung centre

Factory LSD

C's short shifter.

2 1/2" dumpipe into 3 1/4 Magi cat, 3" resi splits into twin 2 1/4 system using two polished Magnaflows and double walled stainless tips.

Suspension:

All front end bushes have been replaced using ProFlex bushes from USA

I have rear end bushes which need to be installed

Full set of HSD coilovers fitted

Rolling stock:

18 x 8" Apec Apache in shadow chrome

225, 40 x 18 Nankang NS2's tyres all round

Car has been used on Apec site.

ICE:

Pioneer head unit DEH-4850MP cd/mp3 player

Clarion front Splits

US Audio 10" sub and amp

Interior

Immaculate black velour with grey inserts

Registered and engineered as a 4 seater, has brand new rear seatbelts

Not a great deal to say except it is probably the best standard import interior you will ever see.

Pictures:

rxjet7rhfnew.JPG

IMG_0021.jpg

IMG_0018.jpg

kzmaxint1.jpg

kzmaxint2.jpg

kzmaxint3.jpg

kzmaxint4.jpg

Extra info:

I have spent about 10K on this car in the last 12 months, do the sums of the parts I have installed and ask yourself is a car a couple grand cheaper worth the effort.

Contact Details: 0410 679 133

Location: Melb east

Delivery & Conditions of Delivery: Pick up or delivery at purchasers expense.

If there are any further questions please don't hesitate to ask.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...