Jump to content
SAU Community

Borg Warner EFR Series Turbo's V 2.0


Piggaz

Recommended Posts

here you go guys. 

BW 8374 1,04

Built head with studs, gasket, springs blah blah

Stock bottom end

HKS 256 drop in cams

CRG split pulse manifold

e85 

504kw at 30psi. I told tuner to cap it at 30psi due to stock bottom end. Should see another 30-50kw with 4-5 more psi.

30psi around 4600rpm.

Its a little laggier than my mechanics (he gets 33psi by around 4400rpm), which I think could be due to having a massive 60mm old tech gate or perhaps due to it not being a built motor.

Still a bucket load off fun. Starts to wind up around 3k and really picks up boost 4k

Dyno run below and dyno sheet attached.

 

dyno.png

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Sub Boy32 said:

I put a thread up asking the Mods to open up the EFR thread again......they just deleted my post.

 

Seen it. Half the reason why I made this.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone had to start it again, lets hope it does not get bogged down with BS ?

But it is hard to find info on the EFRs ?

I think because there are so many build types for Skylines now ranging from stock  to over 3.2Lt , it is also hard to have back to back comparisons.

But from what I can find out,  the EFR8374 will get me going quicker, with a much better transient response and roughly to the same top HP as my PT6266 Gen 2 ?

Hopefully some back to back comparisons :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Want to see comparison with -5's. LOL, only joking.

It would be good this time if the bullshit comments are kept to a minimum and maybe another thread started for bw only dyno results. Just so there's a place for chit chat and one for results. The old thread did lack results. Just a suggestion. Carry on[emoji106]

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, usmair said:

here you go guys. 

BW 8374 1,04

Built head with studs, gasket, springs blah blah

Stock bottom end

HKS 256 drop in cams

CRG split pulse manifold

e85 

504kw at 30psi. I told tuner to cap it at 30psi due to stock bottom end. Should see another 30-50kw with 4-5 more psi.

30psi around 4600rpm.

Its a little laggier than my mechanics (he gets 33psi by around 4400rpm), which I think could be due to having a massive 60mm old tech gate or perhaps due to it not being a built motor.

Still a bucket load off fun. Starts to wind up around 3k and really picks up boost 4k

Dyno run below and dyno sheet attached.

 

dyno.png

Are you running E85?

Good to see this thread back in action!

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
    • Easiest way to know is to break out the multimeter and measure it when cold, then measure all the resistances again once it gets hot enough to misfire. Both the original ignitor and the J Replace version. Factory service manual will have the spec for the terminal measurements.
    • Yes that sounds right. Cars currently in the shop for the engine work. Will need to remeasure .. but yes I think I must be targeting 45cm from fender. 
×
×
  • Create New...