Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey ... I am in the process of purchasing another FI car soon and thought i would throw this up!

its a toss up between a another GTR or one of these ford XR6t's.

i am interested mainly in development scope of both the RB26dett Vs the Barra i6t.

I am well aware of the ford barra i6t obvious on paper advantages of larger CC , its VCT and much later design but wondering if it Compares in scope (design ,efficiency, quality , longjebady, enhancements available to the RB26dett)

Anyone ever had the chance to own/use both under similar circumstances ie dyno runs with simular turbos on each engine etc and form any opinions?

:D

I have had

RB25

RB26

RB30

RB30 hybrid 26 head

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/170799-the-rb26dett-v-barra-i6t/
Share on other sites

interesting wiki has a bit of a comparision going on

Barra 270T

This is the most powerful I6 ever produced by Ford. Going by the officially stated specifications, it is possibly tied as the most powerful stock production I6 in the world (compared to the 360 HP M54 found in the 1400-unit limited production BMW E46 M3 CSL), since the Japanese high-power turbocharged I6's are by historical convention typically given artificially low specifications on paper (usually no more than 280hp). Going by empirically measured performance, the 4.0L 270T exceeds the ~320hp (239kW) output of most stock 2.6L RB26DETT and 3.0L 2JZ-GTE engines. It also has the highest torque of any Australian built engine. It is found in the BA and BF Falcon F6 Typhoon and Tornado and has been in production from 2004. The increase in power is from a Garrett GT3540 turbocharger.

Power is 270 kW / 362 HP @ 5250 rpm

Torque is 550 Nm @ 2000-4000 rpm

RB30/26 GTR with its high 4.11 gearing is a good match for response and acceleration up and rolling at any speed/any gear to the xr6t with a similiar peak power to weight ratio.

A near perfect package for a street gtr in my opinion is a single gt35r .82 (possibly .5 xr6t comp cover to pick up mid range) bolted on to the side of the rb30/26. Mild cams, good exh. manifold, and you can push close to 400rwkw.

They get off the line very quickly without bogging down + almost a little too much wheelspin with 4000-4500rpm on board. So no massive high rpm boy racer style launches required.

But saying that... You already own a few jap cars.. The XR6T cruiser mildly modified is good fun.

I often go for a bit of a cruise with a buddy who owns one thats making 270rwkw with only a tune and a bit of boost. Its a great package.

Gets up and goes hard without it sounding like one is 'hooning'.

He has owned it for a few years now racked up 80,000kms and has done in. 1 x turbo, 1 x gearbox and 1 x diff. :P

Typical aussy built car. My previous VS 5ltr 5speed went the same way after a few mods with the addition of cracking the rear irs subframe. lol

I can tell you they dont hold together long above 450rwkw no mater how builds them. You also find that their cam control from car to car is a little off due to the fact they press on the sensing teeth to the camshaft with no guid pin or keyway. Also power consistency from car to car once you turn them up is quite poor.

IMO Australian manufacturers can design cars they just cant mass produce cars when compared to japanese manufactuers.

By all accounts the engines do all right.

Shame about the 1800kg car that surrounds them, and the weak as piss drivelines behind them. Does anyone know of a modified turbo falcon that hasn't done a box or diff (or 3)?

later design but wondering if it Compares in scope (design ,efficiency, quality , longjebady, enhancements available to the RB26dett)

we have a few fleet XR6t's here (none stock :P ) and my next lease will probaly be for one but i would never say it is a later design..... the base design is older with vct tacked on... ever opened one up? if you do you will see just how basic and cheaply built they are.

but for the coin they are great bang for buck and when modded seriously stonk. The only let down is build quality and consistant niggling problems but hey it under lease... you dont pay anyway :P

Edited by URAS
I have heard of a few people going through those turbo's with increases in boost, thought this might have been another one...... obviously not.

WTF?? Dags/paint flakes from where???

Fixxxer?

Their turbo failures are caused by a couple of things..

The oil screen/filter blocks causing the turbo to starve.

The paint flakes and metal dags within the inlet pipe which is a well known problem.

Fords fix was to rip the pipe off and sand blast it. Thats what they did with my buddy's anyway. Just poor build quality.

I own a BF XR6 Turbo at the moment.

Maybe visit www.fordxr6turbo.com for a look at how the engine responds to light and heavy modification (depending on budget obviously), Im a member and there is tonnes of info on how the guys have their T's set up...

My T is moderately stock - and not an impressive handling car to say the least, you dont feel all the power because of the weight it holds - but iv heard an edit (custom tune) makes it a different beast all together...

Cheers.

the xr6t are a grossly undertuned engine from factory to keep them below the v8 power level. they are only running 6psi. with a flashtune, better exhaust and some more boost they become a rather impressive machine indeed. the big thing would be to get 1 from new, and baby it for the first few thousand k's. i think a lot of the problems that there are with the xr6ts is that people are getting them then thrashing them from day 1, and not letting the engine wear in. but then they are a 1700kg car. but if you want to carry friends, or tow, it is the one.

as far as the gtr goes, you have the problem of if something does break, it will probably cost a fair bit more to fix. my mate was quoted under $1000 for a new turbo from ford for his xr6t. but you do get the image that goes with it, and 4wd. but you also get the police attention too.

As has been said before.

An XR6T, whilst no GT-R, will give you bundles of turbo joy without you being hassled by the police.

The really important point is to get a GOOD tune. The Ford ECU is several orders of magnitude more complex & better than anything connected to an RB26. A bad tune will probably leave you with a rod through the side of the block from detonation. Or just less power as the ECU goes into a protection mode.

for the money on mods i don't think theres anything on the market that will compare with the power of XR6T.

I got one thats pushing 338rwkw, all it has is valve spring, injectors, flash tune, full exhaust........it does start to lose power after few runs...desperate for a cooler.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
×
×
  • Create New...