Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

anyone had any experiance with stroking the rb20det to 2.4 with the 26 crank/rods?

i'd like to know how it behaves compared to the rb25det, what its torque curve's are like, and can you retain the factory ecu? things like that.

anyone done this conversion as i see it as a very cheap and profitable upgrade, the only costly thing being (as long as you can run it on the factory ecu or power fc) would be the pistons.

rb26 crank/rods = $300-400

machining = no more than $200

pistons = ???

pistons i cant see costing more than $2000, so compare this to upgrading to a rb25 ($3000) or 26 ($6000) and it seems pretty enticing, considering you'd rebuild it for little extra cost (price of bearings, gaskets and seals) and rather than have a used motor that you dont know much of its previous life, youd have a fresh 2.4 with plenty of strength for some big boost.

any opinions or personal experiances?

Karlos

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/17259-stroking-the-rb20det-proscons/
Share on other sites

At the moment in tossing up if im going to do that or build a rb30. About 2.3L is the max you can i belive before you get into trouble. It should be fine to run on the stock ecu but i have only just started thinking about this so i cant help you any further. I know others have looked at doing this so hopefully they will add and help us both.

machining - you forgot a '0', try $2G - that's the indication I got from a machine shop to balance everything up for a rebuild. Doesn't include boring for the bigger pistons.

I'm planning to rebuild my 'old' engine (it spat a chunk out of #1 piston). The Toyota pistons (4AGE or 4AGZE, no-one can confirm which) seemingly cannot be got (new) for love nor money (if you're lucky, you might be able to pick up a S/H set from somewhere). Otherwise you'd be stuck with an expensive Tomei or similar set. I'm planning to just get a set of 1mm oversize 'standard' pistons.

You should be able to utilise the R32 ECU, because it can be re-programmed if necessary.

machining will only cost a minimum as i have most of the machining equipment at work and can do it myself, the boring is the only thing i need to outsource and i can get the company we use to do it at cost price. the motor will only make max 300kw at the fly so i wont go over the top with cc'ing, balancing and blueprinting etc.

whats this about toyota pistons? are they the right size to suit the stroker? are the gudgeon pins the same diameter?

or did i read into that too much and you just mean your rebuilding a toyota motor? ;)

if i can get the dimensions necisary i'll email a few piston places and see if they can find a suitable piston.

however is it either 80.5mm or 82.5mm? and what about piston height?

Well, having all the gear certainly makes a difference.

I was referring to the 80.5 mm pistons - there's some confusion as to whether they are 4AGE or 4AGZE pistons. As far as I can ascertain, they basically 'bolt in'.

I had a mate in Toyota searching for them - but it seems they no longer exist. And the Lotus boys who run 4AGE engines in their clubmans can't seem to find any either.

well i found some info

http://www.toysport.com/catalog/parts%20by...engine/4AGE.htm

these guy say the OEM pistons for the 4AGE are 81.5mm (although they have hks pistons that are 81.00mm)

http://www.club4ag.com/faq%20and%20tech_pa...cifications.htm

http://www.club4ag.com/faq%20and%20tech_pa...A-GZE_specs.htm

piston pins can be either 18mm (80's 4age) or 20mm (90's 4age and 4agze)

cant find any info on the pin size for the rb26det though, anyone know?

  • 2 years later...

The wiseco catalogue shows some of the toyota pistons they do, not sure of pin location but maybe worth checking out, from the american site.

got some prices in us $$ from http://www.pistons-online.com/sport.asp?ma...ta&st=48&end=48, prices for piston kit i.e. rings too.

they have gtr pistons for $870 K551M88 (88mm)

celica 2ZZ (also Pontiac Vibe)

K569M82 82.00 / 3.228 both 20 mm pins $580

K565M82 82.00 / 3.228

Celica/MR2 4AG

K533M82 82.00 / 3.228 .040 (18mm pin) $580

K505M82 82.00 / 3.228 .040 (19 mm pin) $580

K506M82 82.00 / 3.228 .040 (20 mm pin) $580

or you could just put the 20 head on a 25 block, i have put the 25 headgasket on the 20 head and everything lines up except a few water and oil holes which need to be made a bit bigger, other than that all the head bolts ect line up perfectly.

even better buy a RB25 Na from a R32, use the 25 bottom end with the 20 head. and the 25 head with a 30 bottom end. then u can choose which one u want

I have also breifly considered doing this and from what I understood the toyota pistons needed are from a toyota 4agze as they are forged and ceramic coated to suit the factories supercharger.

But I beleive there were two different compression ratios in the gze, hence two different types of gze piston and there is also an issue with pin height.

Where can you get an RB26 crank with rods for $300???

Anyways, this has been covered many times and there is more info hiding under the search button. Try RB24/23 etc.

AFAIK the std 4AGZE pistons are 81mm with a 20mm pin.

With a RB26 crank this gives around 2300cc

The RB26 rods have a small end of 21mm, so they need to be bushed if using the Toyota pistons.

Regarding availabilility of the 4AGZE stuff, when I looked into this last, there was a thread on Toymods that said the pistons were available through Toyota, however most dealers didn't want to help. From memory they were ~$120 each.

I think the head also needs some work to suit the increased bore. There will also be some fiddling with combustion chamber & deck height to get the desired compression ratio.

RB26 crank and rods seems way cheap for $300-400. I'd be budgeting more like double that.

A new oil, water pump and new fasteners would probably be worth factoring in as well.

You should think about this for a minute too.

If you make a RB20 2.3/2.4L you will still have the standard RB20DET head, where the standard valves will cause a potential restriction with the larger capacity motor.

If you got a standard RB25, already you have extra capacity, and a fair increase in valve size.

If you have the smaller 20DET head with the larger capacity, its a sort of flawed idea from the beginning.

Only my 2c.

If you want effortless torque and power build a RB30DET. (You will never look back at smaller displacment motors again)

that $300 for crank and rods was a price i got off someone in the for sale forum, look around and you'll always find a bargain.

in the end i just bought a 31 with the rb24det already in it.

but seriously the main reason for doing this isnt to make huge power, think about it, instead of spending 3k on a second hand motor with no service history and having to go to the trouble of changing engine no's and engineering engine swaps, you spend 2k and get a fresh motor. (spend the left over on better breathing cams or head porting?)

besides, theres plenty of rb20's with standard heads making close to 300kws

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...