Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have a R33 GTR V-Spec and a R33 GTS-T Series II so I think that I can respond to your question.

The GTR is an adrenaline rush every single time that you drive it. It has grip levels that most cars can only dream of. In every area it has performance in reserve (power, handling, braking and grip) for whenever you need it. The car demands your respect and you have to concentrate whenever you drive it. Last but not least you always seem to have you hand in you pocket paying for something on the GTR.

By comparison the GTS-T is a street car with good performance, although I have never been shut down by a Holden of a Ford (although I have not tried a XR6 Turbo). It is a much easier car to drive because you do not have to consciously hold it back. It still does everything well in the power, handling and braking areas but it does not have the amazing grip levels of the GTR. The running costs are also much lower and it makes a perfect daily driver.

They are both very different animals and I enjoy driving each of them for what they offer.

ah i did that step. from r33 gtst series 2 to a r32 gtr. its worth it!!

i find that they are the same maintenance wise,petrol is about 20bux more ontop.. repairs wise, if something breaks in a gtr you better have deep pockets. take care of the car and it will take care of you.. hopefully haha

gtst is great to learn in , i probaly wouldve killed myself if i went straight to a gtr

I went from 32 gtst to 32 gtr.

greatest nissan decision ever made, thought not the most efficient. Main reason why... i suppose i was sick of getting raped by sr20's and always felt envious for gtr's passing me.

The GTR is like no other car you have driven before, the stability levels are so much higher, control, power, comfort... its just a compilation of driving experiences u get when your in one.

If you want to upgrade, buy a trench coat with lots of pockets.

Apart from that have fun in one and be safe, a whole new world compared to the gtst.

just the feedback i was after tbh! I was considering going with the GTT but, yea it's not really an upgrade compared to going down the road of the 32/33 GTR. (can't afford 34 GTR)

I reckon GTR's will always hold there value more than even newer modeled single turbs. already 32 gtr's are getting even with GTT's in price!

Plus when ya m8's have silvias u gotta get some advantage over them! i'v got a test drive in a 33GTR soon, although still considering 32 gtr. whichever provides the best example in my path i will go for!

I was at the point of buying a R34GTT with a Nismo kit when I found my R33 GTR V-Spec.

The challenge with a GTR is to find a good one, otherwise you will always have your hand in your pocket. It is not uncommon for people to have engine failures on the day after purchasing a GTR that then results in a $8 to $10 k rebuild.

Make sure you get a good one.

different strokes i guess. My limited driving experience with the gtr leaves me a little cold fish. As a daily I dont think I could live with it. A low speed under steer pig is one description I heard and I found it quite apt. If we lived life in the fast lane it would be a completely different story. The gtr comes in to its own when the pace picks up and the driver is experienced enough or brave enough to get the awd system to actually work. Below that threshold the gtr to me is a very ordinary heavy front end car to drive.

The gtst is a far more enjoyable car to punt around in and can be modded to perform extrememly well at the strip and track to boot. There are creds that come with owning a gtr and deservedly so. For me however I am quite happy to play both at the strip and track and then have a nicer street driver as well.

I always aspired to a gtr and when the time came to buy a line i wasnt even considering a gtst. After driving a few tho I was more than happy to go with the gtst and use the savings for mods.

I can always stick a gtr badge on my gtst tho cant I. :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...