Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Cubes..

"The holding a steady throttle, boost builds and then starts surging 'while' holding that same throttle opening"

That is the problem that I find difficult to live with. Motorways etc when doing 100km/h in 4th or 5th. This is definately a problem when holding a steady throttle and boost just coming on whilst maintaining same throttle input..

ANd when I say flicking between load cells...its more like 3 or 4 cells.

The AFM voltage I can see flicking between 2200 mv and 2700mv, you can feel a slight roughness but this oscillation is usually followed up by a large jerk and you can see the AFM voltage jump straight down the vertical when this occurs.

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Its all good. I did skim read a touch and for one reason or another didn't see the 3-4load point drop but read it as flicked between load point 3-4. :)

Yes a larger turbine housing will sort the surge.

Improve the motors ability to breathe will also; You have cams and cam gears yet?

A turbine housing might set you back 50-100 + 300 for machining. Might be better off put towards a set of cams or reground rb26 cams? BUT its still not certian the surge will be sorted.

Reground rb26 cams are a shade over $200 for 2 sticks. You net around 8.5mm lift and ~252-254duration. So a nice mild increase that won't completely kill your low end.

Thanks Cubes. No I don't have cam gears or others. I am in negotiation with GCG so I may be able to sort something out with them because the turbo was sold as a standard Rb25 so should suit the car the way it is.

New cams are a big deal..take timing belt off, rocker cover etc. Not really up for that.

Your after the OP6 turbine housing.

I can't see by that pic if it is an OP6 or not.

The compressor backing plate actually looks the same as an early (series 1) RB20DET BB turbo I've seen.

Its definitely not the run of the mill Leopard/Cima Vg30DET turbo; it 'could' be a really really early turbo from one of those. Not sure.

The only VG30DET turbo I've seen is that from the Z31 which is journal bearing and then that of the later leopard/cima. The R34 GTT RB25DET Turbo also runs the same OP6 turbine housing that the VG30DET turbo does.

Can't be sure exactly what that turbo is without seeing more pics.

The OP6 is stamped on the outside of the turbine housing near the core.

So thats a journal bearing turbo?

Would be interesting to know what car that is off as they are an extremely extremely rare turbo if thats the case.

The Z31 VG30DET's as I said above run a VLT style turbo where as the Leopard/Cima VG30DET runs a the BB OP6 Turbo with 45v1/2/3/4 on the comp cover. It 'could' be the really early 1980-1986 Leopards; I'd assume they would have run around with the journal bearing turbo's. But whats interesting is why would they not have used the same old VLT/Z31 turbo.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/VG30DET-TWI...1QQcmdZViewItem

Thats a Vg30DET BB turbo with its OP6 Turbine housing.

Ha HAA ! I am sworn to secrecy on my Hi-Flow, suffice to say it'll do about 270rwkw, and has a watercooled plain-bearing core. It's not excessively laggy with the AVC-R tweaked-up correctly - certainly does the job for me, anyway!

Maybe You should investigate how changing the compressor housing slightly would affect surge? This seems to be at the heart of the problem, after all. Half a mil' here, a few thou' there.. . . might make all the difference.

Cubes, have all the ones you seen had OP6 in that location. This one has Y24B..

might not be right.

Hardman - sounds like you got a good turbo there. The secret recipe :) Yeah I think the compressor is where it's at but the exhaust housing may be the cheapest to change..

All of the larger turbine nissan turbo's I've seen have the OP6 on them.

You can't get any more pics? Get one of directly looking at the comp wheel also showing the compressor cover and one of the turbine housing in a similiar position. Then we can see both wheels and know or at least have a better idea of what it is.

Its definitely not a run of the mill VG30DET turbo; I suspect its something old. I suspect that due to the comp covers backing plate. Either that or its been highflowed.

If you have the turbo take some measurements of the turbine scroll at points that are easy to describe and I will compare them with the one I pulled off mine a little while back.

From memory the cross section width near the wastegate flap is ~5mm wider with the OP6 housing compared to that of the rb20/rb25 housings.

Anybody know if this looks like BB turbo? Do the non BB turbos still have exhaust housings that are useable?

untitleddm3.jpg

thats a non ball bearing turbo, u can tell by the ribbing on the back of the front housing. To me it looks like a t3 off a VL Turbo!

Edited by mr_rbman

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have been being VERY quiet about what you're alluding to, as it is something that ticks me off... The number of cars from factory that run coil overs is HUGE! Most of them these days do... The other part that annoys me, is people saying "Well all the incabin adjustable suspension is illegal by blah blah blah"... If that's the case, then why can I buy a car brand new that can do it if, FULL STOP in cabin adjustable suspension is illegal...   Also, I could just chuck some aftermarket shocks in my car, throw the stock springs on, after my blue slip, dump my super low springs back in. Same shock and spring style setup... Hell, they could also be the same colour springs etc.     I'm voting, BlueSlipper didn't want to touch the above car for some reason. Whether it be some sort of bias against the car, the owner, them maybe having previously done dodgy shit and now they're being super careful in case they get slapped in the face by the Gumbyment again... Find a new blueslip place.   And can confirm as you had said, yes there are holy bibles of vehicle heights, and all sorts of other suspension stuff. Heck your run of the mill mechanic, and tyre shop has access to all of that stuff. It's how they do wheel alignments...
    • Funny story Heading to Sydney this morning on the HWY there was some slow traffic, so I gave it the beans and midway through my overtaking "power run" I lost all power It seems that I missed a hose clamp,  and the MAF and filter went WiFi To make this more problematic, the little tool kit that lives in the boot, is sitting in the sun room at Goulburn......LOL Luckily for me I found a bit of steel on the side of the road that could be used like a rusty and bent flat head screw driver to tighten it up enough that it got me into Sydney, it is now all tight like a tiger with the aid of a 8mm socket Note to self: Use my brain and double check stuff, and always keep that little tool kit in the car for when I have a brain fart
    • Oh, and as for everyone with their fuel economy changes, I switch between E10 and 98 in the company car. Even do when I had personal cars that could run on E10. You know what changed my fuel economy in any noticeable way? How I drove, and where I drove. Otherwise, say on full tanks of just back and forth from work only (So same trips, same sort of traffic), couldn't notice a difference that I can correlate to the type of fuel in use. In the current vehicle, that's over 42L of USABLE fuel. While 98 is all "more energy dense", it also has higher knock resistance as it takes more energy to get it to ignite too. The longer hydrocarbons, typically more tightly bound. So running the same ignition map, can also produce less power, if there isn't enough time to get it all burnt through properly, as yep, the flame propagation speed is different from lower octane fuel to higher (Higher has a lower flame propagation, due to the more tightly bound and harder to self ignite funs. This is also typically where, a vehicle that is designed purely to run on 91 (Whether it be E10 or normal 91) usually sees absolutely no real world difference in fuel economy for the normal man, woman, or dog.
    • We've got some servos around me that have 91 with E10, 91 (no E10), 95, and 98. At those stations the change from 91 E10 to 91, is typically around 8c/L.   But lets not get started on the price of fuel in Oz. It's ridiculous. All the service stations around me, bar one, the price of fuel has been over the $2 mark per litre for the cheapest, 98 being around $2.45. That one service station is a CostCo, fuel from it comes from the same refineries, and makes no pitstops, it runs great, including the 98. In fact, I've had no issues on CostCo fuel, but plenty of issues at other stations!. The CostCo fuel, was $1.65 roughly this week for 94 with E10. $1.88 for 98. Servos directly across from it, $2.10 for 91 E10, and $2.48 for 98. The part I had to laugh at? If I drive multiple HOURS away from Brisbane, say out near Nanango, or Kingaroy, or even out to Goondiwindi, the price of their fuel, is the same as what it is at the CostCo... Oh, and that BP servo at Goondiwindi is HUGE and goes through epic turnover of fuel, so it's not sitting there for weeks going to shit. And what blows me away, my mate is one of the people who drives the Fuel Tanker all around QLD, delivering to all those places. At the same company his previous role was doing the "local haul" deliveries... Same truck, same driver, same pickup point it all comes from. So you tell me, how the hell it is 60c/L CHEAPER for fuel, when nearly all else is equal, except they require a B-Double to drive half a day out of Brisbane, and half a day back, every second day, compared to the delivery that can be under 30 minutes drive from the fuel pickup point... Not to mention, go five blocks down the road, and Ampol to Ampol will vary 30c/L... And I've had this conversation with my mate... The way it's priced, is just typical, pure and utter rubbish... He also does runs from Brisbane, to all over QLD, down to Newcastle, Sydney, Nowra, Melbourne, Geelong, and even out to parts of the NT depending on the companies needs. His main stuff is all the longer distance away from home for a few days at a time, then when he's back, he loves to just pickup extra shifts wherever he can in whichever truck, hence all the weird different places.   Oh, as for getting E10 into all the fuels in Australia... It was very quickly highlighted, that we don't have enough biomass available to use to make E10 sustainably like they require, and it would dramatically cut into our, and the worlds food chain supply...   I vote we all just start running on liquid methane gas... Plenty of that just getting tapped off at tips from underground decay... (Note, this is pure just stupid commenting. I could very easily highlight the reasons its not a good idea especially on scale...)
    • Am I correct in assuming that the R35's are getting the classic skyline haircut off the odometer?  Quick search on carsales, there are 33 08 and 09 GTR's for sale, only 2 of them have more then 100,000km's on them (116,075 and 110,000 respectively).  And somehow there are about 25 for sale with around 60,000kms? Looks like the classic skyline haircut to me =/
×
×
  • Create New...